Skip to main content
Glama

Get Trending Coins

crypto.trending.get
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve trending cryptocurrencies, including optional NFT collections and categories, to identify market movements.

Instructions

Get trending cryptocurrencies

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
include_nftsNoInclude trending NFT collections
include_categoriesNoInclude trending categories

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoTool response payload. Shape varies per tool — consult the tool description and inputSchema. May be an object, array, string, or number depending on the upstream provider response.
errorNoPresent only when the call failed. Includes error code, message, request_id, and any provider-specific extras.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Addedv1.5.0
  2. Removedv1.0.20
  3. Addedv1.0.15
  4. Removedv1.0.14
  5. Addedv1.0.6
  6. Removedv1.0.5
  7. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate a safe read-only operation. The description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., how trending is determined, limits).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is efficient and front-loaded. Could include additional context but no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with output schema and annotations, the description is minimally sufficient but lacks explanation of 'trending' or filtering.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% description coverage for two boolean parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get trending cryptocurrencies' clearly states the tool's function. It is distinct from sibling tools like crypto.coin.detail or crypto.coin.search, though it could explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other crypto tools (e.g., crypto.coin.search for specific queries). No context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/whiteknightonhorse/APIbase'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server