Skip to main content
Glama
vmware-skills

VMware-Monitor

vm_performance

Read-onlyIdempotent

Rank virtual machines by real-time CPU, memory, disk, and network usage. Get live metrics for powered-on VMs, busiest first, to identify performance bottlenecks.

Instructions

[READ] Real-time CPU/memory/disk/network utilisation per virtual machine.

Returns the list envelope with a real total (VMs that reported metrics) — with the default limit of 25, truncated tells you whether more VMs sit behind it. LIVE data (cpu_usage_pct, mem_usage_pct, mem_consumed_mb, disk_read_kbps, disk_write_kbps, net_kbps), busiest first. Only powered-on VMs have a real-time provider; powered-off VMs are skipped. Point-in-time only.

Use this to rank load across VMs; for one VM's configuration use vm_info, and to see the same VM correlated with its host, alarms and events use vm_investigation_bundle.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax VM rows to return (default 25; None = all).
targetNovCenter/ESXi target from config (default if omitted).
vm_nameNoFilter to a single VM by exact name (None = all powered-on VMs).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changedv1.9.2
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Max VM rows to return (default 25; None = all)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / target / description
      Added value: +"vCenter/ESXi target from config (default if omitted)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / vm_name / description
      Added value: +"Filter to a single VM by exact name (None = all powered-on VMs)."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "result": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": true,
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "title": "Result",
      -      "type": "array"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "result"
      -  ],
      -  "title": "vm_performanceOutput",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  2. Addedv1.6.1

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations, the description discloses important runtime behavior: only powered-on VMs have a real-time provider and are included, powered-off VMs are skipped, data is point-in-time only, the returned total reflects VMs that reported metrics, and truncated indicates pagination. This meaningfully enriches what annotations alone convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and front-loaded: purpose first, then response semantics, then usage guidance. Every sentence contributes information, with no filler or repeated schema content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there is no output schema, the description does a strong job of explaining the response envelope, exposed metric fields, ordering, filtering behavior, and alternatives. An agent can correctly select and invoke this tool without needing additional details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds useful context about limit behavior and result ordering, but it does not materially explain individual parameters beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a clear statement of what the tool does: returns real-time CPU/memory/disk/network utilization per VM, prefixed with [READ]. It further differentiates itself from siblings by explicitly naming vm_info and vm_investigation_bundle as alternatives for different needs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states when to use this tool ('rank load across VMs') and explicitly points to alternatives for other scenarios: vm_info for a single VM's configuration and vm_investigation_bundle for host/alarms/events correlation. This gives an agent direct routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vmware-skills/VMware-Monitor'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server