Skip to main content
Glama
vmware-skills

VMware-Monitor

certificate_status

Read-onlyIdempotent

Identify ESXi host certificates nearing expiry before they interrupt management. Returns expiry dates and days remaining, flagging hosts that need renewal within a configurable warning window.

Instructions

[READ] Per-host ESXi management certificate expiry.

An expired ESXi cert drops host management — this surfaces it before the outage. Returns the list envelope with a real total; each row has host, not_after, days_until_expiry and an expiring flag, soonest first. Host certificates only — the vCenter appliance's own certificate is not covered.

Use this alongside license_status and ntp_status for a platform-hygiene sweep. Renewing a certificate is a write this skill cannot do; use vmware-aiops or vCenter directly.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax host rows to return (None = all).
targetNovCenter/ESXi target from config (default if omitted).
warn_daysNoFlag certs expiring within this many days (default 30).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changedv1.9.2
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Max host rows to return (None = all)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / target / description
      Added value: +"vCenter/ESXi target from config (default if omitted)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / warn_days / description
      Added value: +"Flag certs expiring within this many days (default 30)."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "result": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "additionalProperties": true,
      -        "type": "object"
      -      },
      -      "title": "Result",
      -      "type": "array"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "result"
      -  ],
      -  "title": "certificate_statusOutput",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  2. Addedv1.6.1

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark it read-only/idempotent/non-destructive; the description adds non-obvious behavior: the list envelope has a real total, rows are sorted soonest-first, and only host certs are covered. It also confirms renewal is outside the tool's capability, reinforcing the read-only contract.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is longer than strictly necessary (the outage-motivation sentence is not required for invocation), but it is front-loaded with the essential read/resource and every other sentence carries either return-format or routing information. Slight trimming would make it a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by listing the returned row fields, sort order, scope limitation, and read-only boundary. Together with the fully documented schema, an agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters (limit, target, warn_days) are already documented in the schema. The description adds no new parameter-level detail beyond mentioning the expiring flag, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with '[READ] Per-host ESXi management certificate expiry', a specific verb plus resource. It names the precise returned signal (expiring, days_until_expiry) and explicitly disclaims vCenter appliance coverage, leaving no ambiguity about scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Positions the tool as part of a platform-hygiene sweep alongside license_status and ntp_status, and explicitly states what it cannot do (renew certificates) with a pointer to vmware-aiops or vCenter. This gives an agent clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/vmware-skills/VMware-Monitor'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server