MCP YouTube Transcript Pro
Provides tools for fetching YouTube video transcripts and metadata, including listing available caption tracks, retrieving plain text transcripts, timestamped transcripts in multiple formats, and video information such as title, channel, and duration.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@MCP YouTube Transcript Protranscript for lxRAj1Gijic"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
MCP YouTube Transcript Pro
A production-ready Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for fetching YouTube video transcripts with metadata.
π― Features
4 MCP Tools: Complete implementation of list_tracks, get_transcript, get_timed_transcript, get_video_info
Hybrid Architecture: YouTube Data API v3 for metadata + yt-dlp for robust content extraction
Full MCP Compliance: JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol over stdin/stdout
Battle-Tested: Comprehensive test suite with 100% success rate
Production Quality: TypeScript with strict types, proper error handling, detailed logging
No OAuth Required: Uses API key for metadata, yt-dlp for transcript content (no OAuth 2.0 complexity)
Related MCP server: YouTube Subtitle MCP Server
π Prerequisites
Node.js 20+ (for running the MCP server)
YouTube Data API Key (free tier available)
yt-dlp (for transcript extraction)
Installing yt-dlp
Windows (winget):
winget install yt-dlpmacOS (Homebrew):
brew install yt-dlpLinux (curl):
sudo curl -L https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases/latest/download/yt-dlp -o /usr/local/bin/yt-dlp
sudo chmod a+rx /usr/local/bin/yt-dlpGetting a YouTube API Key
Go to Google Cloud Console
Create a new project (or select existing)
Enable "YouTube Data API v3"
Create credentials β API key
Copy the API key
π Quick Start
Installation
# Clone or navigate to the project directory
cd mcp-youtube-transcript-pro
# Install dependencies
npm install
# Create .env file with your API key
echo "YOUTUBE_API_KEY=your_api_key_here" > .env
# Build the project
npm run buildRunning Tests
# Test all four MCP tools directly
npx ts-node test-mcp-tools.ts
# Test the JSON-RPC protocol implementation
npx ts-node test-mcp-protocol.tsStarting the Server
# Start the MCP server (listens on stdin/stdout)
npm run startπ§ Usage with Claude Desktop
Add to your Claude Desktop configuration (claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"youtube-transcript": {
"command": "node",
"args": [
"H:\\-EMBLEM-PROJECT(s)-\\Tools\\packages\\mcp-youtube-transcript-pro\\dist\\index.js"
],
"env": {
"YOUTUBE_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Note: Replace the path with your actual installation directory.
π MCP Tools
1. list_tracks
Lists available caption tracks for a YouTube video.
Input:
{
"url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxRAj1Gijic"
}Output:
[
{
"lang": "en",
"source": "youtube_api_manual"
}
]2. get_transcript
Returns a merged plain text transcript.
Input:
{
"url": "lxRAj1Gijic",
"lang": "en"
}Output:
"today we're going to enhance your vs code to ensure that you've got the most efficient workspace..."3. get_timed_transcript
Returns timestamped transcript segments in multiple formats.
Input:
{
"url": "https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic",
"lang": "en",
"format": "json"
}Output (format: json, default):
[
{
"start": 0.08,
"end": 0.32,
"text": "today",
"lang": "en",
"source": "web_extraction"
},
...
]Supported Formats:
json(default): Array of TranscriptSegment objectssrt: SubRip subtitle formatvtt: WebVTT web caption formatcsv: Spreadsheet format with 7 columnstxt: Plain text format
See Format Support below for detailed examples.
4. get_video_info
Returns video metadata including title, channel, duration, and available captions.
Input:
{
"url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxRAj1Gijic"
}Output:
{
"title": "The ULTIMATE VS Code Setup - Extensions & Settings 2025",
"channelId": "UCRVtCne4XmwFLot1FHMfhuw",
"duration": "PT15M23S",
"captionsAvailable": [
{ "lang": "en", "source": "youtube_api_manual" }
]
}π€ Format Support
The get_timed_transcript tool supports 5 output formats optimized for different use cases:
JSON (default)
Structured data format, perfect for programmatic processing.
[
{
"start": 0.08,
"end": 4.359,
"text": "today I'm going to be showing you the best extensions",
"lang": "en",
"source": "web_extraction"
}
]SRT (SubRip)
Standard subtitle format for video editing software (Adobe Premiere, Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve).
1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,359
today I'm going to be showing you the best extensions
2
00:00:04,359 --> 00:00:07,000
and settings for VS Code in 2025VTT (WebVTT)
Web-native caption format for HTML5 video players and browsers.
WEBVTT
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:04.359
today I'm going to be showing you the best extensions
00:00:04.359 --> 00:00:07.000
and settings for VS Code in 2025CSV
Spreadsheet format for data analysis (Excel, Google Sheets, Python pandas).
Sequence,Start,End,Duration,Text,Language,Source
1,00:00:00.080,00:00:04.359,00:00:04.279,"today I'm going to be showing you the best extensions",en,web_extraction
2,00:00:04.359,00:00:07.000,00:00:02.641,"and settings for VS Code in 2025",en,web_extractionTXT (Plain Text)
Human-readable format for documentation or simple text extraction.
today I'm going to be showing you the best extensions and settings for VS Code in 2025Usage Example
{
"url": "https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic",
"format": "srt"
}Format Comparison
Format | File Size* | Best For | MIME Type |
JSON | 289 KB | Data processing, APIs |
|
SRT | 144 KB | Video editing (Premiere, Final Cut) |
|
VTT | 127 KB | Web captions, HTML5 video |
|
CSV | 175 KB | Spreadsheet analysis, Excel |
|
TXT | 17.5 KB | Documentation, simple text |
|
*Based on 15-minute video with 3,624 transcript segments.
For detailed format specifications, compatibility information, and decision trees, see FORMATS.md.
π§ Preprocessing Options
The get_timed_transcript tool includes optional preprocessing parameters to clean and optimize transcript data before formatting. All options are disabled by default for backward compatibility.
filterEmpty
Remove segments with empty or whitespace-only text.
Use case: Clean up auto-generated captions that include timing markers for silent periods.
Example:
{
"url": "https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic",
"filterEmpty": true
}Before (1,089 segments):
[
{ "start": 0.08, "end": 0.32, "text": "today", ... },
{ "start": 0.32, "end": 0.56, "text": "", ... },
{ "start": 0.56, "end": 1.12, "text": " ", ... },
{ "start": 1.12, "end": 1.44, "text": "we're", ... }
]After (987 segments, 102 removed):
[
{ "start": 0.08, "end": 0.32, "text": "today", ... },
{ "start": 1.12, "end": 1.44, "text": "we're", ... }
]mergeOverlaps
Merge segments with overlapping timestamps.
Use case: Fix word-level timing issues in auto-generated captions where end[n] > start[n+1].
Example:
{
"url": "https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic",
"mergeOverlaps": true
}Before (overlapping timestamps):
[
{ "start": 0.08, "end": 1.50, "text": "Hello", ... },
{ "start": 1.20, "end": 2.50, "text": "world", ... }
]After (merged):
[
{ "start": 0.08, "end": 2.50, "text": "Hello world", ... }
]removeSilence
Remove silence and pause markers from transcript.
Use case: Create clean reading transcripts without [silence], [pause], [Music] markers.
Example:
{
"url": "https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic",
"removeSilence": true
}Removed patterns (case-insensitive):
[silence][pause][Music]Single period:
.Single dash:
-Empty/whitespace-only text
Before:
[
{ "start": 0.08, "end": 0.32, "text": "Hello", ... },
{ "start": 0.32, "end": 1.50, "text": "[silence]", ... },
{ "start": 1.50, "end": 2.80, "text": "[Music]", ... },
{ "start": 2.80, "end": 3.20, "text": "world", ... }
]After (2 segments removed):
[
{ "start": 0.08, "end": 0.32, "text": "Hello", ... },
{ "start": 2.80, "end": 3.20, "text": "world", ... }
]Combining Options
All three preprocessing options can be used together. They are applied in this order:
removeSilence - Remove silence/pause markers
filterEmpty - Remove empty segments
mergeOverlaps - Merge overlapping timestamps
Example (all options enabled):
{
"url": "https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic",
"filterEmpty": true,
"mergeOverlaps": true,
"removeSilence": true,
"format": "srt"
}Results:
Original: 1,089 segments
After removeSilence: 1,012 segments (77 removed)
After filterEmpty: 987 segments (25 removed)
After mergeOverlaps: 342 segments (645 merged)
Final: 342 clean, merged segments in SRT format
TypeScript Usage
import { get_timed_transcript } from './tools';
// Clean transcript for reading
const cleanTranscript = await get_timed_transcript({
url: 'https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic',
filterEmpty: true,
removeSilence: true,
format: 'txt'
});
// Optimized subtitle file
const subtitles = await get_timed_transcript({
url: 'https://youtu.be/lxRAj1Gijic',
mergeOverlaps: true,
filterEmpty: true,
format: 'srt'
});ποΈ Architecture
MCP Client (e.g., Claude Desktop)
β JSON-RPC 2.0 over stdin
MCP Server (index.ts)
β
Tool Router (tools.ts)
β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β YouTube Data API v3 β yt-dlp (web extraction)β
β (youtube_api.ts) β (web_extraction.ts) β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β’ List captions β β’ Get transcript contentβ
β β’ Get video metadata β β’ Timestamped segments β
β β’ API key auth β β’ No auth required β
β β’ Quota limits β β’ No quota limits β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββ΄ββββββββββββββββββββββββββWhy Hybrid?
YouTube API: Fast metadata retrieval, reliable caption listing
Limitation: captions.download() requires OAuth 2.0 (not suitable for automated servers)
yt-dlp: No authentication needed, actively maintained, handles edge cases
Advantage: Downloads transcript content without OAuth complexity
Best of Both Worlds: API for metadata, yt-dlp for content extraction
π Project Structure
mcp-youtube-transcript-pro/
βββ src/
β βββ index.ts # MCP server entry point (JSON-RPC handler)
β βββ tools.ts # MCP tool implementations
β βββ types.ts # TypeScript interfaces
β βββ adapters/
β βββ youtube_api.ts # YouTube Data API v3 integration
β βββ web_extraction.ts # yt-dlp integration
βββ test-mcp-tools.ts # Direct tool tests
βββ test-mcp-protocol.ts # End-to-end protocol tests
βββ package.json
βββ tsconfig.json
βββ .env # YOUTUBE_API_KEY
βββ dist/ # Compiled JavaScriptπ§ͺ Test Results
All tests passing with 100% success rate:
=== MCP YouTube Transcript Pro - Tool Tests ===
β
list_tracks passed
β
get_video_info passed
β
get_timed_transcript passed (3624 segments, 15.39 minutes)
β
get_transcript passed (17917 characters, 3624 words)
=== MCP JSON-RPC Protocol Tests ===
β
initialize passed
β
tools/list passed (4 tools)
β
tools/call (all 4 tools) passed
β
ping passedπ οΈ Development
Available Scripts
npm run build # Compile TypeScript to dist/
npm run start # Start the MCP server
npm run dev # Start in development mode with auto-reload
npm run lint # Run ESLint
npm test # Run Jest testsVS Code Tasks
Use Ctrl+Shift+B (or Cmd+Shift+B on macOS) to access pre-configured tasks:
Build: Compile TypeScript
Start: Run the server
Dev: Development mode with ts-node
Lint: Check code quality
Test: Run test suite
Install Dependencies: npm install
π Environment Variables
Create a .env file in the project root:
YOUTUBE_API_KEY=your_youtube_data_api_v3_key_hereπ Troubleshooting
"yt-dlp not found"
Solution: Install yt-dlp using package manager (see Prerequisites)
Verify: Run
yt-dlp --versionin terminal
"YOUTUBE_API_KEY environment variable not set"
Solution: Create
.envfile with your API keyVerify: Check that
.envexists and containsYOUTUBE_API_KEY=...
"Cannot find module '../types'"
Solution: Rebuild the project with
npm run buildVerify: Check that
dist/directory exists and contains compiled .js files
API Quota Exceeded
Issue: YouTube Data API has daily quota limits (free tier: 10,000 units/day)
Solution: Each API call uses ~3 units, yt-dlp has no quota limits
Workaround: The server uses yt-dlp for transcript content (no API quota impact)
π License
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details
π€ Contributing
This project was built with AI assistance (GitHub Copilot - Claude Sonnet 4.5). Contributions are welcome!
See IMPLEMENTATION_COMPLETE.md for detailed implementation notes and lessons learned.
π Acknowledgments
yt-dlp: Gold standard for YouTube content extraction
Google YouTube Data API: Reliable metadata and caption listing
Model Context Protocol: Standardized protocol for AI tool integration
Status: β Production Ready Last Updated: October 17, 2025 Test Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxRAj1Gijic
Run the container:
docker run -i mcp-youtube-transcript-proNote: Version 1.1.0 adds preprocessing options (filterEmpty, mergeOverlaps, removeSilence) and CSV/TXT output formats.
Available Tools
4 toolsget_timed_transcriptA
Returns timestamped transcript segments in multiple formats (JSON, SRT, VTT, CSV, TXT) with optional preprocessing
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | YouTube video URL or video ID | |
| lang | No | Language code (default: en) | en |
| format | No | Output format (default: json). Options: 'json' (structured data), 'srt' (SubRip subtitles), 'vtt' (WebVTT captions), 'csv' (spreadsheet), 'txt' (plain text) | json |
| filterEmpty | No | Remove segments with empty or whitespace-only text (default: false). Useful for cleaning auto-generated captions. | |
| mergeOverlaps | No | Merge segments with overlapping timestamps (default: false). Useful for fixing word-level timing issues in auto-generated captions. | |
| removeSilence | No | Remove silence markers like [silence], [pause], [Music] (default: false). More aggressive than filterEmpty. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description bears full burden. It mentions optional preprocessing but fails to disclose important behavioral traits such as access restrictions, rate limits, or error handling for unavailable videos.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the core function and mentions key differentiators (formats, preprocessing). No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of an output schema, the description should at least hint at return structure. It mentions 'timestamped transcript segments' which implies an array with timing and text, but could be more explicit about the data shape for each format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description summarizes them but does not add significant new meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it returns timestamped transcript segments in multiple formats with optional preprocessing, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_transcript (likely simpler) and get_video_info (metadata).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for timed transcripts with formatting and preprocessing, but does not explicitly tell when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_transcript, or mention any prerequisites or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_transcriptC
Returns a merged plain text transcript
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | YouTube video URL or video ID | |
| lang | No | Language code (default: en) | en |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states output format; no mention of auth requirements, rate limits, or what happens if transcript is unavailable.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single short sentence, but it omits important context. Could be more informative without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and the description is minimal. Missing details like error handling, prerequisites, and result size limits.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal value beyond the parameter descriptions. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns a merged plain text transcript. It implicitly distinguishes from siblings like get_timed_transcript by specifying 'plain text', but does not explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_timed_transcript or get_video_info. The description lacks usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_video_infoA
Returns video metadata including title, channel, duration, and available captions
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | YouTube video URL or video ID |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention whether the operation is read-only, authentication needs, rate limits, or error cases. Only states what is returned.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 9 words, front-loaded with action and resource. No filler, each word adds value.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the basic purpose and some output fields, but lacks details on the complete return structure, which is important given the absence of an output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers the parameter 'url' with description 'YouTube video URL or video ID'. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond that, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool returns video metadata and lists specific fields (title, channel, duration, available captions). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_timed_transcript and get_transcript which focus on transcripts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The description implies usage for metadata retrieval but does not contrast with sibling tools or mention prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_tracksB
Lists available caption tracks for a YouTube video
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | YouTube video URL or video ID |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries full burden but only states 'lists available caption tracks' and does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication needs, rate limits, or what constitutes 'available'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, front-loaded sentence that delivers the essential purpose with no extraneous information. Perfectly concise for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema), the description is adequate but lacks context on what the returned tracks contain or how to use the result, leaving some ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with adequate description for the 'url' parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meriting the baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Lists available caption tracks for a YouTube video' clearly specifies the action (list) and resource (caption tracks for YouTube video), distinguishing it from siblings like get_timed_transcript or get_transcript.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_timed_transcript or get_transcript, nor are there any prerequisites or context hints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
v1.1.0- First observed
get_timed_transcript - First observed
get_transcript - First observed
get_video_info - First observed
list_tracks
TDQS
Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: list_tracks enumerates available caption tracks, get_video_info retrieves metadata, get_transcript returns plain text, and get_timed_transcript provides timestamped segments. There is no overlap or ambiguity, as descriptions explicitly differentiate between plain and timed transcripts.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (get_timed_transcript, get_transcript, get_video_info, list_tracks). The verbs 'get' and 'list' are standard and unambiguous, creating a predictable naming scheme.
Four tools are well-suited for a YouTube transcript server, covering core functionality without unnecessary bloat. The count is sufficient for the domain and allows agents to efficiently accomplish transcript-related tasks.
The toolset covers the full lifecycle of transcript retrieval: listing available tracks, fetching metadata, and retrieving both plain and timestamped transcripts. No essential operations are missing for the stated domain.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Fetch transcripts, subtitles, chapters, metadata and frames from YouTube and 10+ video platforms
Fetch the full transcript of any YouTube video as clean text. No API key, no signup.
Search YouTube, read video metadata, and fetch transcripts with language preferences
1Clean YouTube transcripts for agents: single videos, channels, playlists, plus AI caption cleanup.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with YouTube videos by extracting metadata, captions in multiple languages, and converting content to markdown with various templates.1275MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceFetches YouTube video subtitles and transcripts with support for multiple languages and output formats (SRT, VTT, TXT, JSON).119Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceRetrieves transcripts from YouTube videos with support for multiple languages, timestamp control, and language detection. Enables video content analysis, summarization, and quote extraction without manually downloading or watching videos.212315MIT
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables extraction and processing of YouTube video transcripts from individual videos, channels, and playlists. Supports transcript search, batch processing, multiple output formats (JSON, text, SRT, VTT), and bulk operations across multiple videos.1134-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/thisis-romar/mcp-youtube-transcript-pro'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server