YouTube Transcript AI
Server Details
Fetch the full transcript of any YouTube video as clean text. No API key, no signup.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- zxl777/youtube-transcript-mcp
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 toolget_youtube_transcriptAInspect
Fetch the full text transcript of a YouTube video. Accepts a YouTube URL (watch, youtu.be, shorts, embed) or a bare 11-character video ID, and returns the transcript as plain text with title and metadata. Optionally pass a BCP-47 language code to select a specific caption track.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | No | Optional BCP-47 language code, e.g. "en", "zh-CN", "es". Omit for the default track. | |
| video | Yes | YouTube video URL or 11-character video ID |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the return format ('plain text with title and metadata'), input normalization across four URL formats plus bare ID, and how the lang parameter changes caption-track selection. This covers the core observable behavior well, though it omits edge-case behavior such as what happens when a video has no captions or an invalid ID is supplied.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Three sentences, each earning its place: purpose is front-loaded in the first clause, the second sentence covers both input flexibility and output format, and the third covers the optional parameter. There is no fluff, no repetition of what the schema already states.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Because there is no output schema, it is important that the description states the return shape, and it does ('plain text with title and metadata'). Both parameters are fully documented in the schema and invocation behavior is clear. The only missing context is failure-mode behavior (unavailable transcripts, invalid IDs), which is a minor gap for a simple read tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% — both video and lang are already documented with clear descriptions including BCP-47 examples. The tool description adds marginal value by explicitly enumerating the URL variants (watch, youtu.be, shorts, embed), but the schema already carries the semantic load, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb+resource pair: 'Fetch the full text transcript of a YouTube video.' It is unambiguous about what is retrieved and explicitly states the output form (plain text with title and metadata), leaving no room to confuse it with a summary, metadata-only call, or video download tool even with no siblings present.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
With no sibling tools to route between, the description supplies clear usage context instead: it enumerates the accepted input forms (watch, youtu.be, shorts, embed URLs or bare 11-character ID) and explains when to set the optional language parameter versus omitting it for the default track. It provides clear invocation context, though there are no explicit exclusions or when-not-to-use statements since no alternatives exist.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
get_youtube_transcript
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user, then choose Claim with GitHub. An organization namespace such asio.github.acme/serveralso needs that organization to have installed the Glama AI GitHub App and approved its permissions, because GitHub discloses organization membership only to apps it has installed. Use HTTP or DNS when it has not.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Free YouTube transcript fetcher: clean text, timestamped, SRT, VTT, Markdown, or JSON. No API key.
Fetch transcripts, subtitles, chapters, metadata and frames from YouTube and 10+ video platforms
Clean YouTube transcripts for agents: single videos, channels, playlists, plus AI caption cleanup.
YouTube transcripts, search, channel/playlist listings and upload tracking for AI agents. No signup.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExtracts clean text transcripts from YouTube videos using their subtitles and returns them as plain text.122MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExtract YouTube transcripts for AI agents, RAG pipelines, and LLM workflows. Supports any YouTube URL. Returns clean text or timestamped segments. No API keys required.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceRetrieves transcripts from YouTube videos with support for multiple languages, timestamp control, and language detection. Enables video content analysis, summarization, and quote extraction without manually downloading or watching videos.212315MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceFetches YouTube video subtitles and transcripts with support for multiple languages and output formats (SRT, VTT, TXT, JSON).119Apache 2.0
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clear and unambiguous by default.
The single tool name get_youtube_transcript follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is consistent with standard naming conventions. There are no mixed styles or conflicting verb choices.
One tool is minimal but well-matched to the server's narrow purpose of fetching YouTube transcripts. While slightly below the typical 3–15 tool range, the server does not feel under-scoped or artificially padded.
The tool fully covers the core domain need by accepting various YouTube URL formats or a bare video ID, returning transcript text, and supporting an optional language parameter. For a transcript-only server, there are no significant missing operations.