Retrieve all updates for a specific project by providing its ID. Use the optional limit parameter to control the number of updates returned.
Get all updates associated with a project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Maximum number of project updates to return (default: 25) | |
| projectId | Yes | ID of the project to get updates for |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| items | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
v1.4.1Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+ "properties": {
+ "items": {
+ "items": {
+ "properties": {
+ "archivedAt": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "body": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "createdAt": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "diff": {
+ "type": [
+ "object",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "diffMarkdown": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "editedAt": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "health": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "id": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "isDiffHidden": {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ "project": {
+ "properties": {
+ "id": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "name": {
+ "type": "string"
+ }
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+ },
+ "slugId": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "updatedAt": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "url": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ },
+ "user": {
+ "properties": {
+ "id": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "name": {
+ "type": "string"
+ }
+ },
+ "type": [
+ "object",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+ },
+ "type": "array"
+ }
+ },
+ "required": [
+ "items"
+ ],
+ "type": "object"
+}v1.1.2Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false. The description adds no behavioral context beyond what is implicit from the name and annotations. It does not describe pagination, ordering, or return format, but does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence of only 6 words. No filler or redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given that an output schema exists, the description does not need to explain return values. The description is sufficient for a straightforward retrieval tool, though it could hint at the nature of updates (e.g., timeline of text changes).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters having descriptions (limit with default, projectId with purpose). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get all updates associated with a project' clearly states the verb (Get), resource (updates), and scope (associated with a project). It distinguishes itself from siblings like getProjectUpdateById, createProjectUpdate, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as getProjectUpdateById for a single update, or when to use filtering vs pagination. No exclusions or context are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tacticlaunch/mcp-linear'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server