List C4D Plugins (Any Type)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already declares the tool is read-only, so the description does not need to repeat that. The description provides some details about the return structure (plugin and plugin_file fields) but does not mention error handling or empty results. This is acceptable for a simple list operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and to the point. Two sentences cover the tool's purpose and parameters without unnecessary fluff. The structure is logical, starting with the overall function and then detailing usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the description does a decent job of explaining the return fields. It does not mention potential errors or edge cases, but for a list/filter tool it is reasonably complete. More details on the exact format of the result (e.g., array vs. object) would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema descriptions cover all parameters clearly. The description adds helpful context, such as the plugin_type can be a string alias or raw integer, and gives examples for plugin_pattern. This complements the schema without redundancy.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly indicates that the tool lists plugins and allows filtering by type and patterns. It mentions the output fields, so the purpose is well understood, though it could be slightly more explicit about returning a list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains how to use the tool (pass plugin_type, name_pattern, plugin_pattern) but does not provide guidance on when to choose this over other list tools. It says 'Generalized' which hints at its scope, but lacks explicit alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.