enable_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it provides none. 'Enable profile' does not explain side effects, persistence, whether a profile must already exist, or how this differs from setting an active profile.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. It contains no information beyond the tool name and fails to earn its place as a useful definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with only one parameter, but the description is still incomplete. Without annotations or an output schema, an agent needs at least some explanation of what enabling does, when it applies, and what the expected result is. None of that is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one required 'name' parameter with no description, and schema description coverage is 0%. The tool description does not mention the parameter or explain what name refers to, leaving the agent with no semantic guidance beyond the parameter key itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is '启用 profile。', which directly translates to 'Enable profile.' This simply restates the tool name with no additional detail, making it a tautology. It does not clarify what enabling a profile entails or how it differs from sibling tools like use_profile or disable_profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many profile-related siblings such as use_profile, create_profile, and disable_profile, the description offers no context to help an agent choose correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.