disconnect_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose side effects and state changes. It only restates the operation ('disconnect... connection') and does not say whether this affects the active profile, whether it is reversible, persists, or requires permissions. This is a meaningful gap for a mutation-like tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence with no filler and the key action is front-loaded. It is concise, though it achieves conciseness by omitting context that other dimensions penalize.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too sparse. An agent cannot tell what happens after disconnecting, how it interacts with get_active_profile/use_profile, or what errors can occur. More context is needed for safe invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description only adds that 'profile' is the target of the operation. It does not explain what name format is expected, whether it is a profile identifier or display name, or any constraints beyond type string.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('断开...连接' / disconnect the connection) and names the resource ('specified profile'). It is not vague, but it does not distinguish itself from siblings like use_profile, disable_profile, or get_active_profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No information about when to call this tool or when to prefer an alternative is provided. With siblings like use_profile, enable_profile, disable_profile, and get_active_profile, the description gives no guidance on how disconnect_profile fits into the workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.