Skip to main content
Glama
Spectoda

easyeda-mcp

by Spectoda

easyeda-mcp

Open-source MCP tooling for AI-assisted work with EasyEDA Pro.

The goal is to let an AI coding agent inspect, review, and carefully automate parts of the PCB design workflow without turning the EDA editor into a blind screen-clicking exercise.

This project is maintained by Spectoda and is designed to be useful outside Spectoda as well.

What This Project Is

easyeda-mcp is intended to become a Model Context Protocol server plus an EasyEDA Pro bridge extension. Together they should let an MCP-compatible agent:

  • inspect the currently open EasyEDA Pro project, schematic, PCB, and panel;

  • review schematics and PCB data against explicit engineering rules;

  • search and evaluate LCSC/JLCPCB component options;

  • run ERC/DRC-style checks exposed by EasyEDA Pro APIs;

  • export manufacturing packages such as Gerber, BOM, CPL, PDFs, and reports;

  • support panel preparation and validation;

  • prepare a JLCPCB order flow for human review.

The first production target is Spectoda controller development, but the public tooling should stay generic enough for other EasyEDA Pro users.

Related MCP server: KiCad MCP Server

What This Project Is Not

This repository must not contain:

  • EasyEDA, JLCPCB, LCSC, GitHub, or Spectoda credentials;

  • private EasyEDA account exports;

  • proprietary Spectoda controller source designs;

  • customer data, pricing secrets, or supply-chain agreements;

  • browser profiles, cookies, OAuth sessions, or local .env files.

Private Spectoda EasyEDA account inventory and controller design mirrors will live in Spectoda's internal workspace, primarily under the datasheets module. This public repository only contains the generic tools and documentation needed to build that workflow safely.

Current Status

Early implementation. The repository currently defines the project scope, architecture, operating rules, contribution model, and a minimal MCP server skeleton with a mocked Level 0 protocol smoke test.

Quick Start

npm install
npm run build
npm run smoke:protocol

Run the MCP server over stdio:

npm run build
npm start

Planned Architecture

The intended runtime chain is:

MCP client / AI agent
        |
        | stdio or streamable HTTP
        v
easyeda-mcp server
        |
        | localhost WebSocket bridge
        v
EasyEDA Pro extension
        |
        | EasyEDA Pro Extension API
        v
Open EasyEDA Pro editor session

Browser automation is reserved for flows that do not have a stable API, especially extension installation/debugging and JLCPCB quote/order preparation.

Initial Tooling Scope

The first useful slice should expose tools in these groups:

  • session.* - bridge status, connected editor windows, selected workspace.

  • project.* - current project metadata and document tree.

  • schematic.* - components, nets, pins, wires, selected primitives, review.

  • library.* - LCSC/JLCPCB/EasyEDA device search and component metadata.

  • pcb.* - board outline, components, nets, DRC, layers, export.

  • panel.* - panel metadata, panelization parameters, validation.

  • manufacturing.* - Gerber/BOM/CPL/PDF/3D export helpers.

  • order.* - JLCPCB quote preparation and human-confirmed browser handoff.

Write operations must stay narrow, explicit, and reversible where possible. The project should prefer typed domain tools over an unrestricted execute_javascript interface.

Development Smoke Testing

Smoke testing will use two lanes:

  1. Protocol lane - run the MCP server locally and call deterministic tools against mocked EasyEDA bridge responses.

  2. Browser lane - use Codex Browser Use / browser automation to open the EasyEDA Pro editor, import the bridge extension, collect console logs, and verify that a real editor session connects.

See docs/browser-use-smoke-testing.md for the intended workflow.

Pull requests should include the smoke report block from docs/pull-request-smoke-checklist.md.

The first implemented smoke command is:

npm run smoke:protocol

It validates the Level 0 mocked bridge path and the initial session.status tool registry.

Repository Map

License

Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE.

Available Tools

1 tool
session.statusA

Return the local EasyEDA MCP bridge status and connected editor windows.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. The verb 'Return' signals a read-only operation, which is the key behavioral trait. It does not detail failure modes or output format, but for a benign status endpoint this disclosure is adequate and does not contradict any annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loads the action ('Return'), and contains zero filler words. Every word contributes to understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (0 params, no output schema, no annotations), the description covers the main purpose. It doesn't specify the exact structure of the returned status, but for a low-complexity status check this high-level summary is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100% (irrelevant here). The baseline for zero-parameter tools is 4, and the description correctly does not attempt to explain parameters that do not exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Return' and clearly specifies the resource: 'local EasyEDA MCP bridge status and connected editor windows.' Although there are no sibling tools, the purpose is unambiguous and fully distinguishes this as a status-checking operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

With no sibling tools, explicit alternative guidance is unnecessary. The description clearly implies this is the tool to call when you need to inspect the bridge status and connected windows. It lacks explicit 'when not to use' statements, but the context is sufficiently clear for a zero-parameter status tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.1.0
    • First observedsession.status

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The name 'session.status' clearly indicates it provides status information about the EasyEDA bridge session.

Naming Consistency4/5

The single tool name 'session.status' is clear and follows a namespace-like convention. While it doesn't follow the typical verb_noun pattern, consistency is trivially satisfied with only one tool, and there is no internal inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

The server name 'easyeda-mcp' suggests a broader purpose, but with only one status-checking tool, it is far too minimal for the apparent scope. One tool is insufficient to interact with EasyEDA in any meaningful way.

Completeness1/5

The server provides only a status endpoint with no tools to perform actual operations on EasyEDA projects, files, or editor windows. It is severely incomplete for its intended domain.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Production-grade MCP server for EasyEDA Pro that enables AI-assisted hardware design review, PCB inspection, BOM sourcing, and manufacturing export through 41 profile-gated tools.
    70
    1,197
    41
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables AI assistants to analyze schematics, inspect PCBs, trace connections, validate designs, and generate embedded code for KiCad projects.
    39
    88
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    KiCad MCP Pro is an MCP server for KiCad EDA workflows. It lets AI agents automate schematic and PCB tasks, ERC/DRC validation, DFM review, and manufacturing export.
    67
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Spectoda/easyeda-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server