Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Search a billion+ documents — papers, books, code, legal cases, forums, Wikipedia, and more.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
mefengl/jail-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
jail

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • Changedsearch1 field changed
      • changedInput schema / properties / type / enum
        Previous value: -[
        -  "academic",
        -  "wiki",
        -  "books",
        -  "legal",
        -  "forums",
        -  "economics",
        -  "packages",
        -  "knowledge",
        -  "news",
        -  "music",
        -  "video",
        -  "health",
        -  "geo",
        -  "fandom",
        -  "tech",
        -  "audio",
        -  "social",
        -  "crypto",
        -  "predictions"
        -]New value: +[
        +  "academic",
        +  "audio",
        +  "books",
        +  "crypto",
        +  "economics",
        +  "fandom",
        +  "forums",
        +  "geo",
        +  "health",
        +  "knowledge",
        +  "legal",
        +  "music",
        +  "news",
        +  "packages",
        +  "predictions",
        +  "social",
        +  "tech",
        +  "video",
        +  "wiki"
        +]
  2. 2 tool updates
    • First observeddetail
    • First observedsearch

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct and complementary purposes: 'search' retrieves a ranked list of documents with basic metadata, while 'detail' provides full metadata for a specific document ID from search results. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, as they represent different stages in a search workflow.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent, simple verb-based pattern ('search' and 'detail') that is intuitive and aligned with their functions. The naming is straightforward and predictable, with no deviations or mixed conventions.

Tool Count3/5

With only two tools, the server feels minimal but functional for its search-focused purpose. It covers the core operations of searching and retrieving details, but the count is borderline thin, potentially limiting advanced interactions like filtering or saving results. However, it is adequate for basic search tasks.

Completeness4/5

For a search server, the tools provide essential coverage: 'search' for finding documents and 'detail' for in-depth metadata. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tools for filtering, sorting, or managing search history, but the core workflow is complete and agents can work effectively with the provided tools.