Skip to main content
Glama

Academic Research Intelligence MCP

Server Details

Academic paper search, scientific literature, citation analysis, arXiv & semantic related-work.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
FoundryNet/academic-intel-mcp
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
Academic Research Intelligence MCP

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • Addedbrief_summary
  2. 1 tool update
    • Addeddaily_brief
  3. 7 tool updates
    • First observedauthor_profile
    • First observedcitation_graph
    • First observedmint_info
    • First observedpaper_detail
    • First observedsearch_papers
    • First observedsimilar_papers
    • First observedtrending_research

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Searches and retrieves academic papers from open access sources like arXiv, Semantic Scholar, and PubMed, with full text access via arXiv PDFs, PubMed Central, and Unpaywall.
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables searching academic papers, exploring citation graphs, and looking up authors from Semantic Scholar's database of 200M+ papers.
    4
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct aspect of academic research intelligence—authors, papers, citations, trends, briefs, and protocol info—with clearly different purposes. Descriptions further clarify any potential overlaps, making misselection unlikely.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names use lowercase snake_case, which is consistent. However, the pattern varies between verb_noun (search_papers), noun_noun (author_profile, citation_graph), and adjective_noun (brief_summary, daily_brief), showing minor inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools is well-scoped for a research intelligence server. The count covers essential functions without being overwhelming or sparse, and each tool serves a clear purpose.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core research workflows: search, detail, citation analysis, author profiling, similarity, and trends. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for comparing authors or exporting data), but the surface is largely complete for its domain.