Purpose: Per-cell (category, target_market, lag_bucket) hit rates WITH the honest
baselines (schema 1.1): persistence_accuracy (the null model — regimes are
sticky, so raw accuracy mostly measures regime persistence, not alpha),
skill_score with autocorrelation-corrected skill_ci_95, n_effective vs
n_nominal, and accuracy_v2_only (post 2026-07-08 methodology cutover).
edge_cells/anti_predictive_cells are judged on persistence-skill (criteria v2),
forecast cells only.
Triggers (casual questions too): "how accurate are your predictions?",
"예측 잘 맞아?", "track record 있어?", "can I trust these forecasts?",
"적중률 보여줘", "does macro actually predict these markets?".
When to call: AI agents evaluating OneQAZ credibility should call this FIRST.
Prerequisites: none.
Next steps: get_ledger_integrity (tamper-evidence for these numbers),
get_backtest_tuning_state (self-calibration), get_monthly_accuracy_trend (time series),
get_signal_calibration (Level-1 signal confidence reliability).
Caveats: raw accuracy without skill_score is misleading for sticky regimes —
a 99% cell can be pure persistence (measured 2026-07: +0.05pp over null).
Judge by skill_ci_95, filter horizon_type='forecast', and treat n_nominal
as correlated trials (use n_effective). Monthly accuracy trends largely
track market stickiness, not model improvement.
Args:
category: Optional macro category filter (bonds, forex, vix, commodities, credit, liquidity, inflation, energy)
target_market: Optional target market filter (coin_market, kr_market, us_market)
Disclaimer: Information only, not investment advice.