Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

RFC Editor MCP.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
pipeworx-io/mcp-rfc-editor
GitHub Stars
0

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 20 tool updates
    • First observedask_pipeworx
    • First observedbcp
    • First observedbet_research
    • First observedcompare_entities
    • First observeddiscover_tools
    • First observedentity_profile
    • First observederrata
    • First observedforget
    • First observedpipeworx_feedback
    • First observedpolymarket_arbitrage
    • First observedpolymarket_edges
    • First observedrecall
    • First observedrecent_changes
    • First observedremember
    • First observedresolve_entity
    • First observedrfc_metadata
    • First observedrfc_text
    • First observedsearch
    • First observedstd
    • First observedvalidate_claim

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server for creating, loading, and editing RFC TXT documents using the rfc-editor Python library. It provides a suite of tools to manage document components including sections, abstracts, titles, and author metadata.
    29
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables programmatic access to IETF RFC documents, allowing users to fetch, search, and extract specific sections from RFCs.
    3
    56
    19
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server for obtaining, parsing and reading RFC documents from the ietf.org website, providing programmatic interactive tools.
    3
    2
    Apache 2.0
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with detailed descriptions that prevent confusion. Tools like ask_pipeworx, bet_research, compare_entities, validate_claim, and the RFC-specific tools all target different tasks, leaving no ambiguity.

Naming Consistency2/5

Tool names follow no consistent pattern: some use snake_case (ask_pipeworx, bet_research), others are single words (bcp, errata, forget), and some use mixed conventions (rfc_metadata, validate_claim). This inconsistency makes it harder for an agent to predict naming.

Tool Count3/5

With 20 tools, the count is on the higher end for an MCP server. While not excessive, the server bundles multiple unrelated domains (RFC documents, data queries, memory utilities), making it feel overloaded for a server named 'Rfc Editor'.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface is quite comprehensive: RFC access is fully covered (metadata, text, search, errata, lists), and the Pipeworx layer offers query, comparison, profiles, fact-checking, memory, and discovery. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct tool for updating data), but overall it covers the stated needs.