i

Can many small intelligences become smarter than one big AI?

We don't know.

Let's find out together.

i + i > AI ?

• Brand: i

• Idea: multiplayer intelligence

• Address: joinmultiplayer.ai

The goal

Can many personal pocket i—each preserving its own knowledge and individuality—temporarily unite into a single distributed neural network and grow stronger as the swarm scales?

The long-range comparison is intentionally asymmetric: a swarm may bring more people, private experience, and total compute than any single company or model. Equal-budget controls remain useful for measuring coordination cost, but they are not the main claim.

This repository is the open laboratory around that question. It does not assume that the answer is yes.

Related MCP server: Pulse

i

individual
intelligence
information
a person
a match

i learns locally. i owns its memory. i can teach another i.

From question to network

lab discovers → protocol emerges → network works → movement spreads

The laboratory is the first working layer of the network, not a content feed to consume indefinitely. Its questions are open tasks, its traces are work already done, and its verifications are checks another intelligence can repeat. The map is the shared task-and-evidence ledger that keeps those objects connected.

The currently agreed harness path—from exact question through local search and evidence capsules to realized value—is recorded in schema.md.

In the standalone-question loop, a participant takes a public question into an AI they already use and keeps the complete result. The deployed v0.1 form opens answer-type tasks only, so every offered task can return that result as a linked trace. Other contribution types stay hidden until their return formats ship. The portable task-ready record carries the exact question, context, requested next move, provenance, and linked work without requiring an account or a project-specific agent.

A network-capable pocket i is a later product stage. This repository does not currently offer a pocket-AI download or claim that opening a task pack connects an agent to a live network. E002 now provides a public experiment page and an inspectable Codex implementation journal; that journal is laboratory plumbing, not the pocket i itself. The intended transition is explicit:

open questions and evidence
→ portable task packs
→ read-only user-controlled connector
→ local, explicitly taught memory
→ consented network identity and human-approved contributions
→ multiplayer experiments

The current build starts the first synthetic swarm experiment at E002. The repository also contains the installable Pocket i Lab Codex plugin. After explicit per-task consent, Codex lifecycle hooks keep the journal from the conversation the participant is already using; no second agent process is started. The public journal exposes redacted user-visible prompts and final answers plus tool/action status and relative changed filenames. It excludes raw reasoning, tool arguments/results, commands/output, file contents, environment data, local absolute paths, session identifiers, credentials, and the private publication key.

Install the repository marketplace and plugin, then begin a new Codex task:

codex plugin marketplace add yukakust/joinmultiplayer.ai --ref agent/game-loop-v0.1
codex plugin add pocket-i-lab@joinmultiplayer-lab

After reviewing and trusting the hook, opt in from that task with $pocket-i-lab start E002 as <pseudonym>. Inactive hooks perform no network request. $pocket-i-lab finish closes the public run.

E003 is the first physical device step. /network/ creates a private three-slot room; browser nodes let a phone and Mac train their own tiny local weights, while the downloadable headless Python node does the same on a server. One answer has 4,096 possible values and needs all three complete capsule batches. E003 deliberately tests device wiring and local personalization only, not a language model or H0001. The unexecuted next-step design selects local DoRA fine-tuning, one public experiment microscope, and three visible owner checkpoints; see DORA-LANGUAGE-SWARM-PLAN.md.

The lab therefore comes first, but it is meant to become the work surface of the network. Architecture must earn its place through evidence, and each later capability must preserve local ownership, inspectability, and human control.

The lab

doors/         questions people enter through
hunts/         optional public investigations
journal/       observations people bring
hypotheses/    ideas before evidence: ı
experiments/   reproducible tests
i/             results that earned their dot
matches/       people and the traces between them
site/          the public entrance

A path through the lab may begin anywhere, but evidence moves in one direction:

door → contribution → journal → hypothesis → experiment → result → next question

Enter through a door, contribute an observation, or start with the hypothesis pool.

The public entrance reveals only three questions at first. Read GAME.md for the research loop, independent dot, action paths, and ignition map behind that entrance.

Questions, traces, and independent verifications follow the open Data Contract v0.1.

A question is a first-class record. It may be opened before anyone has answered it and picked up years later. The current v0.1 form grows a question from an older public trace; broader event sources remain part of the data contract, not the deployed form. The current honest action is Take this question to my AI: use the task pack with an AI you already control. It does not imply that a model or connector was downloaded.

Public traces can be read at joinmultiplayer.ai/data or consumed without an account as JSON and JSONL. Pending, withdrawn, and private moderation data are never included in these feeds.

Agents that need the whole public task-and-evidence ledger can start with the unified corpus JSON, which combines public questions, traces, and events without private moderation data. Its machine-readable contract is Corpus Schema v0.2.

Every published move also enters the append-only event map. A new trace may continue any older public trace; chronology gives the new event its number while a typed link preserves where the branch began.

Rules

• Ask one sharp question.

• Use the smallest honest test.

• Compare against a strong, simple baseline.

• Publish the complete record required by METHOD.md.

• Publish what failed.

• Separate observation from interpretation.

• Let evidence place the dot.

• No one puts the dot on their own i.

Inconclusive and failed experiments belong here too. Every result must say whether it supports, challenges, or leaves the main question unanswered.

An i may live in code, on paper, on a sticker, or on a wall.

Open a question. Take it to your AI. Return what happened. Leave an i.

Participate

Start with CONTRIBUTING.md. Contributions are public by default; read ETHICS.md and PRIVACY.md before sharing data.

Code is licensed under MIT. Original documentation and laboratory data use the terms in DATA_LICENSE.md.