pseudonym-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@pseudonym-mcpmask this: John Doe, SSN 123-45-6789"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
pseudonym-mcp
Local pseudonymisation tools for LLM workflows — replace detected PII with opaque tokens before you hand text to a cloud LLM, then restore those tokens afterward.
Expose MCP tools (mask_text and unmask_text) that your client or agent can call as an explicit privacy step. The server detects PII locally, replaces it with opaque tokens, and keeps the token mapping in memory for later restoration.
It is a defense-in-depth measure, not a compliance silver bullet. Read the Limitations and GDPR & AI Compliance sections before assuming this stack does more than it does.
What you get
46 recognizers across twelve locales, all of them live by default: Poland (PESEL, NIP, REGON, dowód, paszport, księga wieczysta), the EU (IBAN with mod-97, VAT for all 27 member states, plus DE, IT, ES, FR, NL, CZ/SK, SE, FI and UK national IDs) and the US (SSN, ITIN, EIN, ABA routing, cards). 24 of them verify a real check digit.
--langnarrows that set when you want fewer false positives — see Locale coverage is fail-closed. Heuristic language detection (detectLanguage()) infers the language from text content —--langremains the authoritative override.Hybrid NER engine: Regex for structured PII (SSN, credit cards, IBAN, email, phone) + local Ollama LLM for unstructured entities (names, organisations).
Local-detection architecture: Detection and substitution happen on your machine when the MCP tool is called. The cloud LLM call still happens (that's the point) — but it can see tokens instead of detected PII when your workflow uses the masked output.
Session-keyed mapping store: Tokens like
[PERSON:1]map back to originals in an isolated, per-request session. Multiple round-trips preserve token coherence.Unmask workflow support:
mask_textreturnsauto_unmaskfor clients that want to honor that preference, but this server does not intercept arbitrary LLM responses automatically.Flexible engines: Run
regexonly (no Ollama required),llmonly, orhybrid(default).Strict validation: SSN area-number validation, credit card Luhn checksum, PESEL checksum — all configurable.
Graceful degradation: If Ollama is unavailable, the regex phase still runs and no exception is thrown.
MCP-native: Works with Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor — any MCP-compatible client.
Related MCP server: pii-anonymizer
❌ Without / ✅ With
❌ Without pseudonym-mcp:
Prompt:
"John Smith, SSN 123-45-6789, card 4111 1111 1111 1111"→ sent verbatim to the LLM providerEvery name, ID number, and credit card in your prompt is processed and potentially logged by the provider
A breach at the provider's end exposes those values in cleartext
Sending personal data to a non-EU LLM provider without further safeguards raises GDPR Article 44 questions you'll need to answer
✅ With pseudonym-mcp used before the cloud call:
The same prompt can become
"[PERSON:1], SSN [SSN:1], card [CREDIT_CARD:1]"when you callmask_textfirstThe LLM reasons about structure and content without seeing those detected values in cleartext
The response can be locally de-tokenised with
unmask_textbefore reaching the userDetected direct identifiers are no longer shipped upstream — though structure, dates, indirect references, and any missed PII still are
This is a meaningful reduction in cleartext PII exposure. It is not "no personal data leaves your machine" — see Limitations.
GDPR & AI Compliance
pseudonym-mcp is relevant to compliance work, but it is a technical control, not a compliance product. Whether you are compliant with any specific regulation depends on your full stack, your role (controller/processor), your contracts, your DPIA, and your jurisdiction.
Why this matters
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) classifies names, national ID numbers (like SSN or PESEL), bank account numbers (IBAN), email addresses, credit card numbers, and phone numbers as personal data under Article 4(1). Sending this data to a cloud LLM provider constitutes processing under Article 4(2). Pseudonymisation is explicitly recognised under Art. 4(5) as a risk-reduction measure — but, critically, pseudonymised data is still personal data (Recital 26).
GDPR Article | Obligation | Where pseudonym-mcp helps | Where it doesn't |
Art. 5(1)(c) | Data minimisation | Strips detected direct identifiers before transmission | Doesn't minimise context, structure, or undetected PII |
Art. 25 | Privacy by design and by default | Provides a technical layer that fits into a privacy-by-design architecture | Architecture and policy decisions are still your responsibility |
Art. 32 | Security of processing | Recognised technical measure under Recital 83 (pseudonymisation) | One control among many; doesn't replace access control, logging, encryption |
Art. 44 | Transfers to third countries | Reduces the cleartext PII you transfer | Pseudonymised personal data is still personal data — transfer rules still apply |
Art. 4(5) | Pseudonymisation definition | The mapping store is opaque to the cloud LLM; re-identification requires the local session | Re-identification is possible from context for anyone with side knowledge |
The honest bottom line: pseudonymisation under GDPR Art. 4(5) is not anonymisation. The data remains personal data in your system, and Art. 44 transfer obligations are not switched off just because you tokenised the name field.
AI Act alignment
The EU AI Act places additional requirements on high-risk AI systems that process personal data. Using pseudonym-mcp as an intermediary layer can:
Support data minimisation in your AI system's data flows.
Help document a technical control for transparency and human-oversight requirements.
Align with the principle of technical robustness and safety (Art. 15) by limiting cleartext PII exposure.
It does not change your AI Act risk classification on its own — classification is a function of use-case and deployment context, not of the masking step in front of the model.
US & international applicability
The tool is also relevant outside the EU, with the same caveats:
CCPA / CPRA (California) — reduces personal information sent to third-party processors; doesn't change controller/business obligations or consumer rights.
HIPAA (US healthcare) — pseudonymised PHI is still PHI under HIPAA. Using this tool does not eliminate the need for a BAA with your cloud LLM provider if you're a covered entity or business associate. It can be part of a defensible safeguard posture; it cannot substitute for one.
PCI DSS (payment industry) — Luhn-validated detection reduces the chance card numbers ride in cleartext to an LLM. It is one control; PCI scope, segmentation, and storage rules are separate concerns.
SOC 2 — useful evidence of a technical control limiting PII exposure. Auditors will look at the full picture, not just this layer.
PIPEDA (Canada), LGPD (Brazil), POPIA (South Africa) — all require appropriate safeguards for cross-border personal data transfers. This tool is a relevant safeguard, not a substitute for the legal basis of the transfer.
Sector-specific applicability
Sector | Relevant regulation | PII types commonly handled |
Healthcare | GDPR + HIPAA + national health data laws | Patient names, SSN, diagnoses |
Banking & Finance | GDPR + PCI DSS + PSD2 + DORA | Credit cards, IBAN, SSN, PESEL |
HR & Recruitment | GDPR Art. 9 (special categories) | Names, national IDs, contact details |
Legal | GDPR + attorney–client privilege | Names, case numbers, personal details |
Insurance | GDPR + Solvency II | Personal identifiers, health data |
Public Sector (US) | CCPA + state privacy laws | SSN, driver's license numbers |
Public Sector (PL) | GDPR + UODO + KRI | PESEL, NIP, REGON |
In every row of this table, pseudonym-mcp is a useful building block. None of those regimes can be satisfied by a masking tool alone.
How it works
Your App / Claude Desktop
│
│ explicit mask_text tool call with PII
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ pseudonym-mcp │
│ │
│ Phase 1: Pattern NER │ ← 46 rules: national IDs, tax numbers,
│ │ IBAN, VAT, cards, wallets, devices
│ │ scored, checksum-verified, context-aware
│ Phase 2: Ollama NER │ ← PERSON, ORG (local LLM)
│ MappingStore (session) │ ← [TAG:N] ↔ original value
└────────────┬────────────┘
│ masked text returned to the client/agent
▼
Your workflow sends the masked text
▼
Cloud LLM API
(Claude / GPT-4 / Gemini)
│
│ response with [TAG:N] tokens
▼
┌─────────────────────────┐
│ pseudonym-mcp │
│ unmask_text / revert │ ← tokens → originals
└────────────┬────────────┘
│ restored response
▼
Your App / UserToken format
US / English identifiers (en pack):
[PERSON:1] John Smith
[SSN:1] 123-45-6789
[CREDIT_CARD:1] 4111 1111 1111 1111
[ORG:1] Acme Corp
[EMAIL:1] john@acme.com
[PHONE:1] (555) 123-4567
Polish identifiers (pl pack):
[PERSON:1] Jan Kowalski
[PESEL:1] 90010112318
[ORG:1] Auto-Lux
[NIP:1] 526-000-00-05
[REGON:1] 123456785
[IBAN:1] PL27114020040000300201355387
[EMAIL:1] jan@example.pl
[PHONE:1] +48 123 456 789The mapping is stored in a session-scoped in-memory store. Each mask_text call returns a session_id; pass it back to unmask_text to restore originals.
Real-world example
Meeting note in Claude Code / Obsidian
You have a note:
Meeting with Jan Kowalski (PESEL: 90010112318) from Acme sp. z o.o.
We discussed a contract for 45 000 zł. Contact: jan.kowalski@acme.plIn Claude Code you type:
Use mask_text on this note, then summarise the key points of the meeting.First, call mask_text; pseudonym-mcp replaces detected PII locally:
Meeting with [PERSON:1] ([PESEL:1]) from [ORG:1].
We discussed a contract for 45 000 zł. Contact: [EMAIL:1]Then ask Claude to work from the masked text. Claude responds with tokens:
Meeting with [PERSON:1] from [ORG:1] covered a contract
for 45 000 zł. Follow up via [EMAIL:1].pseudonym-mcp restores originals locally:
Meeting with Jan Kowalski from Acme sp. z o.o. covered
a contract for 45 000 zł. Follow up via jan.kowalski@acme.plIf the masked text is what you send upstream, the cloud provider sees the structure of the meeting and the amount — but not the detected name, PESEL, organisation, or email in cleartext. The swap happens on your machine.
Obsidian vault with session_id
# mask the entire vault once — save the session_id
Use mask_text on my notes — remember the session_id
# ask Claude anything across multiple prompts
Summarise all meetings from Q1
# Claude replies with tokens; restore originals
Use unmask_text with session_id abc123 on the responseThe session_id keeps the token map alive for the session — the same [PERSON:1] always refers to the same person across notes. That consistency is what makes cross-note reasoning possible; it is also what makes a masked corpus potentially re-identifiable to anyone with side knowledge of your work. Use long-lived sessions deliberately.
MCP Prompt Templates
pseudonym-mcp ships two built-in prompt templates that describe a mask → task → unmask workflow.
Important: MCP prompt templates are convenience helpers, not a privacy boundary. Inline prompt arguments may be visible to the host client or model before tool masking happens. For strongest privacy, call mask_text directly first, then use the returned masked_text in your LLM prompt.
pseudonymize_task — inline text
/pseudonymize_task text="Meeting with Jan Kowalski (PESEL: 90010112318). Contract: 45 000 zł." task="Extract action items"Intended workflow:
pseudonym-mcp masks detected PII locally →
[PERSON:1],[PESEL:1]Claude processes the masked text
pseudonym-mcp restores originals in the response
Optional lang argument: en or pl. It only annotates the generated prompt text; the packs the server actually runs come from its own --lang.
privacy_scan_file — file / PDF (macOS only)
Requires macos-vision-mcp — a separate MCP server that uses Apple's Vision framework to extract text from PDFs and images on-device. macOS only.
/privacy_scan_file filePath="/Users/me/contracts/nda.pdf" task="Summarise obligations and deadlines"Intended workflow:
macos-vision-mcp extracts text from the file on-device
pseudonym-mcp masks detected PII locally
Claude processes the masked content
pseudonym-mcp restores originals before the response is shown
Optional arguments: task (default: summarise the key points), lang (en or pl — annotates the prompt text only).
Quick Start
Step 1 — Add to your MCP client (example for Claude Code — no install needed):
claude mcp add pseudonym-mcp -- npx -y pseudonym-mcp --engines hybridStep 2 — (Optional) Pull an Ollama model for full hybrid NER:
ollama pull llama3Skip this step if you only need regex-based masking (--engines regex). Without Ollama, you'll catch structured identifiers (SSN, IBAN, cards, email, phone, PESEL) but not free-form names and organisations.
Global install — if you prefer
npm install -g pseudonym-mcp, replacenpx -y pseudonym-mcpwithpseudonym-mcpin all snippets below.
Restart your client. The mask_text and unmask_text tools appear automatically.
Available Tools
Tool | What it does | Example prompt |
| Pseudonymise detected PII in text. Returns | "Use mask_text on this customer letter before summarising it" |
| Restore original values from a session. Pass the | "Use unmask_text with session_id X to restore the response" |
mask_text input
{
"text": "John Smith (SSN: 123-45-6789) works at Acme Corp.",
"session_id": "optional — omit to create a new session",
"custom_literals": ["John Smith", "Acme Corp"]
}mask_text output
{
"session_id": "3f2a1b...",
"masked_text": "[PERSON:1] (SSN: [SSN:1]) works at [ORG:1].",
"auto_unmask": false,
"ner_status": "ready",
"active_locales": ["pl", "en", "de", "it", "es", "fr", "nl", "cz", "sk", "se", "fi", "uk"]
}active_locales lists the packs that ran. If the server was narrowed with
--lang, the response also carries disabled_locales and a locale_warning
naming the identifiers it cannot see:
{
"active_locales": ["en"],
"disabled_locales": ["pl", "de", "it", "es", "fr", "nl", "cz", "sk", "se", "fi", "uk"],
"locale_warning": "Locale packs disabled: pl (PESEL, NIP, REGON, …); de (Steuer-IdNr, PLZ); … Identifiers from those countries are NOT detected and will pass through unmasked. Start the server without --lang, or with --lang all, to load every pack."
}unmask_text input
{
"text": "The case concerns [PERSON:1] at [ORG:1].",
"session_id": "3f2a1b..."
}Configuration
mcp-config.json (project root)
{
"lang": "all",
"engines": "hybrid",
"ollamaModel": "llama3",
"ollamaBaseUrl": "http://localhost:11434",
"autoUnmask": false,
"strictValidation": true,
"sensitivity": "balanced",
"extraLocales": [],
"customLiterals": ["Jan Kowalski", "78091512345", "+48 123 456 789"]
}Key | Values | Default | Description |
|
|
| Locale pack(s) for regex rules. |
|
|
| Which NER engines to run |
| any Ollama model name |
| Local LLM for entity detection |
| URL |
| Ollama API endpoint |
|
|
| Report the preferred unmask behavior to clients; this server does not intercept responses |
|
|
| Enable checksum / format validation (SSN area check, Luhn for cards, PESEL checksum) |
|
|
| How much confidence a match needs before it is masked |
|
|
| Further locale packs to run alongside |
|
|
| Specific strings always redacted regardless of engine (names, IDs, phone numbers) |
Locale coverage is fail-closed
Every locale pack runs unless you name one. lang defaults to all, so a
fresh server recognises Polish, US, German, Italian, Spanish, French, Dutch,
Czech/Slovak, Swedish, Finnish and UK identifiers at once.
This is deliberate. A server narrowed to one pack is indistinguishable from a complete one at the call site: it returns clean-looking text and reports success while every identifier from every other country passes through untouched. A pack that fires on an order number costs an unnecessary token; a pack that stays dormant over a PESEL costs an incident.
Anything that does not name a real pack — a typo, an empty string, all —
turns every pack on. Narrowing only ever happens because you asked for it, and
when it does the server says so on stderr at startup and in every
mask_text response (disabled_locales, locale_warning).
What it costs. Running twelve packs at once means testing twelve national hypotheses against every number, so shapes that are unremarkable in one country get masked in another:
Input | Masked as | Because |
|
| valid Polish 9-digit numbering plan |
|
| rodné číslo shape |
|
| National Insurance shape |
|
| 15 digits opening with 1 or 2 |
If your documents are single-jurisdiction and those tokens are noise, narrow
the server on purpose — --lang en, --lang pl --extra-locales de,it — and
accept that identifiers from the packs you dropped will not be detected.
Where the config file is read from
mcp-config.json is looked up in the server's working directory, which for
an MCP-spawned process is the client's working directory, not the installed
package. The copy shipped inside the npm package is an example; it is never
loaded. Pass --config /path/to/mcp-config.json when you need a specific file.
Settings layer highest-to-lowest: CLI flags → mcp-config.json → built-in
defaults. Only flags you actually type count as CLI input, so a config file
still decides everything you left off the command line.
CLI flags
All config keys can be overridden at startup (highest priority):
pseudonym-mcp --lang pl --extra-locales de,it --sensitivity strict --engines regexFlag | Description |
| Locale pack for regex rules: |
|
|
| Ollama model to use for NER |
| Ollama base URL |
|
|
| Comma-separated locales to recognize alongside |
| Path to a custom JSON config file |
| Set |
| Comma-separated strings to always redact, e.g. |
Claude Code
claude mcp add pseudonym-mcp -- npx -y pseudonym-mcp --engines hybridClaude Desktop
Edit ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pseudonym-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "pseudonym-mcp", "--engines", "hybrid"]
}
}
}Cursor
Add to ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pseudonym-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "pseudonym-mcp", "--engines", "regex"]
}
}
}Supported PII types
Detection is best-effort. The patterns below are what the tool looks for — not a guarantee of what it will always catch. See Limitations for known gaps.
Every table below is active on the default configuration. --lang switches packs off; see Locale coverage is fail-closed.
Custom literals
Tag | Detection | Match |
| Exact match (case-insensitive) against | Exact string |
Custom literals are applied after the regex phase and before LLM NER, regardless of engine mode. Longest literals are matched first to prevent partial substitution.
How a match is decided
Every pattern carries a confidence score. A checksum that validates raises it, and a context word near the match — "PESEL:", "NIP", "Steuer-ID", "date of birth" — raises it too, enough on its own to reach the default threshold. What gets masked is whatever clears the sensitivity bar:
| Threshold | Effect |
| 0.50 | Default. Distinctive shapes, verified checksums, and anything labelled. |
| 0.35 | Adds weaker shapes: bare IBAN-like strings, dates, generic identifiers. |
| 0.10 | Everything a rule can see, false positives included. |
Where a failing checksum means "not this entity at all" (a card number failing Luhn), the candidate is dropped. Where it means a typo (a PESEL), the candidate survives at lower confidence — a mistyped identifier reaching the cloud is worse than a number masked for nothing.
Rules marked ✓ below verify a real check digit.
Global — active in every language
Tag | Detection | Checksum |
| RFC 5321-compatible address | |
| International formats | |
| 76 countries, ISO 13616 lengths | ✓ mod-97 |
| All 27 EU member states plus | ✓ PL, IT, NL, SI, LU |
| Bitcoin (Base58Check, bech32), Ethereum | ✓ BTC |
| Mobile device identifier | ✓ Luhn |
| Vehicle identification number | ✓ ISO 3779 |
| Hardware address | |
| UUID / GUID | |
| IPv4 and IPv6 | |
| Web address | |
| Calendar date — masked when it reads as a date of birth |
Polish (pl pack)
Tag | Detection | Checksum |
| National ID, 11 digits | ✓ Mod-10 |
| Tax ID — hyphenated, spaced, or bare on invoices | ✓ Mod-11 |
| Business register, 9 or 14 digits | ✓ Mod-11 |
| Dowód osobisty, | ✓ |
| Two letters plus seven digits | ✓ |
| Księga wieczysta (land register) | ✓ |
| Court register number — needs its label | |
|
| ✓ mod-97 |
|
| |
|
|
United States (en pack)
Tag | Detection | Checksum |
| Dashed form; dotted, spaced and bare forms need the label | area/group ranges |
| 13–19 digits | ✓ Luhn |
| Taxpayer identification number | |
| Employer identification number | |
| Bank routing number | ✓ 3-7-1 |
| Nine digits — needs its label | |
| State formats — needs its label | |
|
|
Other European locales
These run by default like every other pack. Narrow to a subset with --lang,
or pair a chosen language with its neighbours using --extra-locales de,it —
a Polish invoice carries German and Italian identifiers too.
Locale | Tag | Detection | Checksum |
|
| Steueridentifikationsnummer | ✓ ISO 7064 |
|
| PLZ | |
|
| Codice fiscale | ✓ |
|
| DNI/NIF and foreigner ID | ✓ mod-23 |
|
| Numéro de sécurité sociale | ✓ mod-97 |
|
| Burgerservicenummer | ✓ elfproef |
|
| Rodné číslo | ✓ mod-11 |
|
| Personnummer | ✓ Luhn |
|
| Henkilötunnus | ✓ mod-31 |
|
| NHS number | ✓ mod-11 |
|
| National Insurance number |
Detected by the LLM, not by pattern
Tag | Detection | Requires |
| Full names | Ollama NER (hybrid / llm engines) |
| Company / organisation names | Ollama NER (hybrid / llm engines) |
Language Detection
pseudonym-mcp includes a lightweight heuristic language detector based on franc.
It infers the language from text content and returns a structured result:
detectLanguage('Umowa zostaje zawarta na czas nieokreślony')
// → { detected: 'pl', source: 'text', raw: 'pol', confidence: 0.94 }
detectLanguage('Hello')
// → { detected: 'unknown', source: 'fallback', raw: null, confidence: null }Field | Description |
|
|
|
|
| Raw ISO 639-3 code from franc (e.g. |
| Score 0–1 from franc, or |
Texts shorter than 20 characters or with low confidence return detected: 'unknown'.
The detector does not affect the current pseudonymisation pipeline — --lang config remains authoritative.
It is a building block for future multi-language and auto-select modes.
Engine modes
Mode | Requires Ollama | Detects structured PII | Detects names / orgs |
| No | Yes | No |
| Yes | No | Yes |
| Yes (graceful fallback) | Yes | Yes |
In hybrid mode, Ollama runs after the regex pass, so the local NER model receives already-tokenised structured identifiers. If Ollama is unreachable, the server logs a warning to stderr and returns the regex-only masked text — no crash, no hang.
Privacy & Security notes
Calibrated claims:
No telemetry from the tool itself. pseudonym-mcp makes no network requests except to your local Ollama instance and (optionally) the MCP stdio transport.
In-memory mapping by default. The mapping store is not written to disk. Sessions are scoped to the server process lifetime.
Idempotent tokens within a session. The same original value always maps to the same token (
[PERSON:1]will not become[PERSON:2]for the same name on a second occurrence), preserving semantic coherence in LLM reasoning.No model training. The local Ollama model operates offline. Your data is not used to train any model by this tool.
Strict validation by default. Invalid SSNs (area 000/666/900+), failed-Luhn credit card numbers, and invalid-checksum PESELs are not masked, preventing false positives from OCR errors or random digit sequences.
What this does not guarantee:
That all PII in your input is detected.
That tokenised text is unlinkable to real people — re-identification from context is possible.
That the cloud provider can't learn sensitive things from structure, timing, or content.
Compliance with any specific regulation — that's a system-level property, not a tool-level one.
Limitations
pseudonym-mcp is a technical privacy control, not a legal guarantee of compliance.
Detection is best-effort. False negatives and false positives are both possible. Indirect references (e.g. "the tall guy from accounting", "my landlord", "the place near the bridge") are not detected. Nicknames, initials, and partial names are typically missed.
Structure still travels. Amounts, relationships between tokens, narrative content, and any PII the detector missed all reach the cloud LLM. Dates are masked only when they read as a date of birth, or at higher
--sensitivity; the rest of the calendar goes through. Tokenisation hides who, not what kind of situation.Narrowing
--langnarrows detection, silently at the source. With a locale pack switched off, its identifiers are not looked for at all — the output looks clean and the call still reports success. The server states which packs are off, on stderr and in everymask_textresponse; nothing downstream forces you to read it.Pre-mask logging is your problem. If your application logs plaintext before passing it to
mask_text, this tool cannot help you.Process-local mapping. Restarting the server ends the session and discards mappings. This is intentional.
Re-identification is possible for anyone with access to the local mapping store, and may be possible from context alone for anyone with side knowledge. This is pseudonymisation under GDPR Art. 4(5), not anonymisation.
No legal advice. Nothing in this README constitutes legal advice. Compliance is a system-level property — talk to your DPO, your compliance team, and your lawyers about your specific deployment.
Under GDPR Art. 4(5) and Recital 26, pseudonymised data is still personal data. pseudonym-mcp substantially reduces cleartext PII exposure but does not eliminate your legal obligations.
Development
git clone https://github.com/woladi/pseudonym-mcp
cd pseudonym-mcp
npm install
npm run build # tsc compile
npm test # vitest (no Ollama required)The test suite runs fully offline — Ollama calls are injected via constructor and mocked in all tests. No live LLM required.
Adding a recognizer
Add a file under
src/patterns/locale/<lang>/(orsrc/patterns/global/if it is language-independent) exporting aPatternRule:
export const regonRule: PatternRule = {
id: 'pl.regon',
entityType: 'REGON',
patterns: [
{ name: 'REGON (14 digits)', regex: /\b\d{14}\b/g, score: 0.25 },
{ name: 'REGON (9 digits)', regex: /\b\d{9}\b/g, score: 0.15 },
],
locales: ['pl'],
context: ['regon', 'nr regon', 'gus'],
description: 'Polish business register number',
validate: regonChecksum,
checksumMode: 'boost',
}Register it in the
allPatternsarray insrc/patterns/index.ts. That is the only wiring — rule sets are derived from the registry by locale, so nothing else needs to know the rule exists.For a brand-new language, add the locale to both
SupportedLocaleandSUPPORTED_LOCALESinsrc/patterns/types.ts— the default selection loads the list, so a pack missing from it never runs — plus the ISO 639-3 → short code mapping insrc/language/language-map.ts.tests/default-coverage.test.tsfails if the two drift apart, and expects one specimen per pack.
Picking a score: start low and let evidence do the work. A shape that only appears as this entity (ABC123456, a codice fiscale) can start near 0.5. A run of digits that could be anything starts at 0.15–0.25 and relies on validate or on context to clear the bar.
Picking a checksumMode: filter when a failed check means it was never this entity (Luhn on a card), boost when it means a typo and a miss would leak data (PESEL, IBAN), gate when the check only rules out impossible values without confirming anything (US SSN ranges).
See src/patterns/locale/pl/ for worked examples of all three.
Contributing
Contributions are welcome. Please follow Conventional Commits for commit messages.
Releases run on changesets. If your change is user-visible, add a changeset to the PR:
npm run changeset # pick patch / minor / major, describe the changeMerging to master then opens a "version packages" PR that bumps the version, server.json, src/version.ts and the changelog; merging that PR publishes to npm (Trusted Publishing, with provenance), tags the release, and refreshes the MCP registry entry. A merge with no pending changesets publishes nothing.
Language pack contributions are especially welcome — German (Personalausweis, Steuer-ID), French (NIR, SIRET), Spanish (DNI/NIE) and others would significantly expand the tool's usefulness.
License
MIT — Adrian Wolczuk
Available Tools
2 toolsmask_textA
Pseudonymize sensitive entities in text before sending to a cloud LLM.
Replaces national ID numbers, tax IDs, phone numbers, IBANs, cards and email addresses via regex, and person names and organization names via local Ollama NER — with opaque tokens like [PESEL:1], [PERSON:2], [ORG:1].
Every locale pack runs by default. The response reports active_locales, and disabled_locales plus a locale_warning whenever the server was narrowed with --lang and can therefore miss identifiers from other countries.
Returns the masked text plus a session_id. Store the session_id to restore the original values later using unmask_text.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | The text to pseudonymize | |
| session_id | No | Optional: reuse an existing session to preserve token numbering across multiple calls | |
| wait_for_ner | No | If true, wait up to 30 s for Ollama to finish loading the model before processing (default: false) | |
| custom_literals | No | Specific strings to always redact (names, IDs, phone numbers) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It is exceptionally transparent: it details the token format, the default locale packs and the disabled_locales/locale_warning behavior when the server is constrained, the NER loading wait mechanism (wait_for_ner), and the session_id semantics. This goes well beyond a typical description and leaves no ambiguity about side effects or limitations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured and front-loaded with the core purpose. Each paragraph contributes information: entities, locale behavior, return values, and restoration hint. It is longer than a minimal description but every sentence earns its place given the tool's complexity. No redundancy or fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given that there is no output schema, the description must explain return values, and it does: masked text plus session_id, plus the active_locales/disabled_locales fields. It also explains the custom_literals behavior and the NER wait option. The description covers all necessary invocation details for an agent to call this tool correctly, though it doesn't mention error conditions or pagination—acceptable for this complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter (text, session_id, wait_for_ner, custom_literals) already documented meaningfully in the schema. The description adds only marginal value—e.g., connecting session_id to restoration and explaining the effect of wait_for_ner—but does not significantly deepen understanding beyond the schema. Baseline is 3, and the description does not elevate it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Pseudonymize sensitive entities in text before sending to a cloud LLM.' It specifies the types of entities (national IDs, tax IDs, phone numbers, etc.) and the methods (regex and local NER). It also distinguishes itself from the sibling tool unmask_text by explaining the restoration role, making it unambiguous what this tool does and how it differs.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use: 'before sending to a cloud LLM' and explicitly notes that unmask_text is used to restore original values via session_id. While it does not enumerate exclusions (e.g., when not to use), the primary use case is well-defined and the alternative is named. This is sufficient guidance for an agent to select it appropriately.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
unmask_textA
Restore original sensitive values in text that was previously masked by mask_text.
Replaces tokens like [PESEL:1], [PERSON:2] with the original values stored in the session identified by session_id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | Yes | The text containing [TAG:N] tokens to restore | |
| session_id | Yes | The session_id returned by mask_text |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It explains token replacement and session requirement, but does not specify return value, error conditions (e.g., invalid session), or idempotency. Adequate but not comprehensive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with clear purpose first, then additional details. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Sufficient for a simple restore tool with two parameters. Output is implied (restored text) but not explicitly stated. No mention of failure modes, but given low complexity, this is acceptable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers both parameters (100% coverage). Description adds value by specifying token format like [PESEL:1] and that session_id must come from mask_text. Adds context beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it restores original sensitive values in text that was previously masked by mask_text, using specific verb 'restore' and resource 'text'. It distinguishes from sibling mask_text by describing the reverse operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly says to use after mask_text and that session_id must come from mask_text. This gives clear context for when to use. However, no explicit when-not or alternatives beyond the sibling.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v0.2.5- First observed
mask_text - First observed
unmask_text
TDQS
The two tools have clearly opposite and distinct purposes: mask_text replaces sensitive entities with tokens, and unmask_text reverses that process. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their roles.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: mask_text and unmask_text. The prefix 'mask' versus 'unmask' clearly indicates the complementary action.
With only two tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for its narrow purpose of pseudonymization and restoration. Though slightly below the typical 3-15 range, each tool is essential and earns its place.
The core lifecycle of pseudonymization is fully covered: masking and unmasking. The session_id mechanism enables restoration, and no additional operations are necessary for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for detecting and redacting PII (Personally Identifiable Information) in PDF documents.
Stateless PII redaction over MCP/REST. Free ≤1000 words or $0.01/call; file upload supported.
An MCP server that provides an API to LLMs to manage their JumpCloud resources.
MCP server unifying ERPs, CRMs, APIs and knowledge base for Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP proxy that pseudo-anonymizes PII before data reaches external AI providers like Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini.18MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for automatic detection and redaction of PII in text, with anonymization and deanonymization capabilities, all local processing.1-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that redacts PII/PHI from text before it ever reaches an LLM — self-hosted, fail-closed, and HIPAA-aware.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing on-prem PII detection and anonymization tools (scan and is_sensitive) for AI agents, ensuring data stays local.4MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/woladi/pseudonym-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server