mcp-server-zipcode-jp
mcp-server-zipcode-jp
Это сервер Model Context Protocol (MCP) для поиска японских почтовых индексов. Использует API поиска почтовых индексов zipcloud для получения информации об адресе.
Особенности
Поиск информации об адресе по японскому почтовому индексу (7 цифр)
Соответствие протоколу Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Related MCP server: jpzip MCP server
Установка
npm install
npm run buildНастройка
Использование в Claude Desktop
Добавьте следующую конфигурацию в ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json (macOS).
{
"mcpServers": {
"zipcode-jp": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/mcp-server-zipcode-jp/build/index.js"]
}
}
}※ Замените /path/to/mcp-server-zipcode-jp на фактический путь, по которому вы клонировали этот проект.
Доступные инструменты
search_zip_code
Поиск информации об адресе по почтовому индексу.
Аргументы:
zipCode(string): 7-значный почтовый индекс (поддерживается как с дефисом, так и без него)
Пример ответа:
{
"results": [
{
"address1": "東京都",
"address2": "新宿区",
"address3": "西新宿",
"kana1": "トウキョウト",
"kana2": "シンジュクク",
"kana3": "ニシシンジュク",
"prefcode": "13",
"zipcode": "1600023"
}
],
"status": 200,
"message": null
}Разработка
Сборка
npm run buildЛицензия
ISC
Available Tools
1 toolsearch_zip_codeC
Search zip code data
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| zipCode | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for disclosing behavior. It only says 'Search' without indicating whether it is read-only, requires authentication, or what the response looks like. Significant behavioral gaps exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (4 words), which is efficient but arguably under-specified. It is front-loaded but lacks structure or additional details that could be provided without harming conciseness. Balanced between brevity and completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It does not explain what kind of data is returned, error conditions, or any usage notes. The agent is left with many unknowns.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the parameter 'zipCode' lacks documentation in the schema. The description adds minimal value by implying the input is the search term, but it does not specify format, country, or constraints. Some meaning is added beyond the raw schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Search zip code data', which clearly indicates the verb (search) and the resource (zip code data). It is specific enough to convey the tool's primary function, though slightly vague as 'zip code data' could be more precise. With no sibling tools, differentiation is not needed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any context about prerequisite conditions, input formats, or use cases. The agent receives no help in deciding if this tool is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
search_zip_code
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no risk of ambiguity. The single tool's purpose is clear and distinct by default.
The single tool name 'search_zip_code' follows a consistent verb_noun pattern, which is clear and predictable.
A single tool for a zip code server feels minimal. While search might be sufficient, the scope is thin compared to typical CRUD or lookup services for zip codes.
The tool surface appears incomplete for a comprehensive zip code service. Missing operations like get_by_code, reverse lookup, or list prefectures limit the agent's ability to perform related tasks.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Normalize and verify Japanese postal addresses into structured fields for agents.
Zippopotam MCP — wraps Zippopotam.us ZIP/postal code API (free, no auth)
日本の住所と郵便番号を相互変換するMCPサーバー。住所から郵便番号を検索、郵便番号から住所を逆引きします。
Verify Japanese companies, invoice-issuer registrations and addresses against government open data.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Japanese postal code to address lookup functionality that can be integrated with AI assistants and other MCP clients.3MIT

jpzip MCP serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables to look up Japanese postal codes, convert zipcodes to addresses, search addresses by query, and list cities in a prefecture using the jpzip dataset.418MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides access to the Kenall postal code API for Japanese address lookups, enabling lookup by postal code and search by address.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceJapanese postal code ⇄ address lookup with bundled official data — fully offline, no API key.MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/tanish-kr/mcp-server-zipcode-jp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server