MCP Learning Server
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@MCP Learning ServerGive me a random quote"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
š MCP Learning Project
A complete educational project demonstrating the Model Context Protocol (MCP) end-to-end.
This project is designed for developers who are completely new to MCP and want to understand:
What an MCP Server is
What an MCP Client is
How they communicate
How tools are registered and discovered
How requests flow and responses return
š Table of Contents
Related MCP server: MCP Server Basic Example
šÆ Project Overview
This project implements:
Component | Description |
MCP Server | A FastMCP server exposing 5 tools via stdio transport |
Interactive Client | A Rich-powered CLI that discovers and calls tools |
Chat Interface | A natural language chatbot that maps queries to tools |
Pydantic Validation | Type-safe input validation with friendly errors |
Logging | Structured logs with INFO/WARNING/ERROR levels |
Architecture Diagrams | Mermaid diagrams explaining every component |
Tech Stack
Python 3.11+
uvpackage managerOfficial MCP Python SDK (
mcp[cli]with FastMCP)asyncio
Pydantic v2
Rich library
šļø Architecture
High-Level Architecture
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā MCP Client ā stdio ā MCP Server ā
ā āāāāāāāāāāāŗā ā
ā ⢠Rich CLI/Chat ā JSON- ā ⢠FastMCP Router ā
ā ⢠ClientSession ā RPC 2.0 ā ⢠5 Registered ā
ā ⢠Tool Discovery ā ā Tools ā
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāRequest Flow
User
ā
Client UI (Rich terminal)
ā
ClientSession.call_tool(name, arguments)
ā
JSON-RPC 2.0 Request (serialized)
ā
stdio Transport (stdin pipe to server subprocess)
ā
FastMCP Server (deserializes, routes by tool name)
ā
@mcp.tool() Function ā Pydantic validation ā Business logic
ā
JSON Response (consistent format)
ā
stdio Transport (stdout pipe back to client)
ā
ClientSession (deserializes response)
ā
Rich UI (pretty-prints with syntax highlighting)
ā
User sees the result ā
Tool Discovery Flow
Client Server
| |
|āāāā initialize() āāāāāāāāāāāāŗ|
|āāāāā capabilities āāāāāāāāāā|
| |
|āāāā list_tools() āāāāāāāāāāāāŗ|
|āāāāā tool schemas āāāāāāāāāā|
| (name, description, |
| inputSchema) |
| |
| Client now knows all tools! |š Key MCP advantage: The client doesn't need hardcoded endpoints. It discovers tools dynamically!
š Folder Structure
mcp-learning-project/
ā
āāā server/ # MCP Server (the "backend")
ā āāā __init__.py # Package marker
ā āāā server.py # FastMCP setup + tool registration
ā āāā tools.py # Pure business logic (no MCP dependency)
ā āāā models.py # Pydantic validation models
ā āāā quotes.py # Hardcoded quote data
ā
āāā client/ # MCP Client (the "frontend")
ā āāā __init__.py # Package marker
ā āāā client.py # Interactive CLI client
ā āāā chat.py # Natural language chat interface
ā āāā ui.py # Rich terminal UI helpers
ā
āāā diagrams/ # Documentation
ā āāā architecture.md # Mermaid architecture diagrams
ā
āāā logs/ # Generated at runtime
ā āāā app.log # Structured application logs
ā
āāā screenshots/ # Screenshots placeholder
ā
āāā README.md # This file
āāā pyproject.toml # Project configuration
āāā uv.lock # Dependency lock file (auto-generated)
āāā .gitignore # Git ignore rulesWhy Each File Exists
File | Purpose |
| MCP registration layer ā connects business logic to the MCP protocol using |
| Business logic ā pure Python functions that can be tested without MCP |
| Validation ā Pydantic models that enforce type safety at the input boundary |
| Data ā separates data from logic for clean architecture |
| Interactive client ā demonstrates the full MCP client workflow |
| Chat interface ā shows how natural language maps to tool calls |
| Presentation ā all Rich formatting in one place |
š Installation
Prerequisites
Python 3.11 or higher
uv package manager
Setup
# 1. Clone the repository
git clone <repository-url>
cd mcp-learning-project
# 2. Create a virtual environment and install dependencies
uv sync
# This will:
# - Create a .venv/ directory
# - Install mcp[cli], pydantic, and rich
# - Generate uv.lock for reproducibilityā¶ļø Running the Project
Option 1: Interactive Client (Recommended)
The client automatically starts the server as a subprocess ā you only need one terminal:
uv run python -m client.clientOption 2: Chat Interface
uv run python -m client.chatOption 3: Server Only (for debugging)
If you want to run the server independently (e.g., to test with MCP Inspector):
uv run python -m server.serverā ļø The server uses stdio transport, so it reads from stdin and writes to stdout. Running it directly will wait for JSON-RPC input ā this is expected behavior.
Testing with MCP Inspector
The MCP Inspector is a visual debugging tool:
npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/inspector uv run python -m server.serverš§° Available Tools
1. current_time
Returns the current UTC time in ISO 8601 format.
Input | None |
Output |
|
2. calculator
Performs arithmetic operations on two numbers.
Input |
|
Operations |
|
Output |
|
Division by zero |
|
3. random_quote
Returns a random inspirational quote from an internal list of 25 quotes.
Input | None |
Output |
|
4. weather
Returns mock weather data for Indian cities.
Input |
|
Supported Cities | Jaipur, Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Pune |
Output |
|
Unknown city |
|
5. uuid_generator
Generates a random UUID (version 4).
Input | None |
Output |
|
š» Example Execution
Interactive Client
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā®
ā š MCP Learning Client ā
ā Connected to MCP Server via stdio ā
ā°āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāÆ
āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
ā š Available Tools ā
āāāāāā¬āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¬āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā # ā Tool Name ā Description ā
āāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā 1 ā current_time ā Get the current UTC ā
ā ā ā time in ISO 8601 ā
āāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā 2 ā calculator ā Perform arithmetic ā
ā ā ā operations ā
āāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā 3 ā random_quote ā Get a random ā
ā ā ā inspirational quote ā
āāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā 4 ā weather ā Get mock weather data ā
āāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¼āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā¤
ā 5 ā uuid_generator ā Generate a random UUID ā
āāāāāā“āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā“āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāā
>>> 2
Enter calculator inputs:
First number (a): 45
Second number (b): 87
Operation (add/subtract/multiply/divide): multiply
ā³ Calling calculator...
āāāā ā
Success āāāā®
ā { ā
ā "result": 3915 ā
ā } ā
ā°āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāÆ
ā± Completed in 0.023s
>>> info weather
š weather
Get mock weather data for an Indian city.
š„ Input Schema:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"city": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["city"]
}
>>> exit
š Goodbye!Chat Interface
š¤ MCP Chat Interface
Ask me about weather, calculations, time, quotes, or UUIDs.
Type 'exit' to quit.
You: What is the weather in Jaipur?
ā³ Calling weather tool...
āāāā š¤ Assistant āāāā®
ā š¤ļø Weather in ā
ā Jaipur: 35°C, Sunny ā
ā°āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāÆ
You: Multiply 45 and 87
ā³ Calling calculator tool...
āāāā š¤ Assistant āāāā®
ā š¢ The answer is: ā
ā 3915.0 ā
ā°āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāÆ
You: Give me an inspirational quote
ā³ Calling random_quote tool...
āāāāāā š¤ Assistant āāāāāā®
ā š¬ "Stay hungry, stay ā
ā foolish. ā Steve Jobs" ā
ā°āāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāāÆExample Log Output (logs/app.log)
2026-07-08 10:30:15 | INFO | mcp.server | FastMCP server instance created: 'MCP Learning Server'
2026-07-08 10:30:15 | INFO | mcp.server | Starting MCP Learning Server (stdio transport)...
2026-07-08 10:30:16 | INFO | mcp.client | Client starting ā connecting to MCP server...
2026-07-08 10:30:16 | INFO | mcp.client | stdio transport established
2026-07-08 10:30:16 | INFO | mcp.client | MCP session initialized
2026-07-08 10:30:16 | INFO | mcp.client | Discovered 5 tools: ['current_time', 'calculator', ...]
2026-07-08 10:30:20 | INFO | mcp.client | Calling tool: calculator with args: {'a': 45, 'b': 87, 'operation': 'multiply'}
2026-07-08 10:30:20 | INFO | mcp.server | Tool called: calculator(a=45.0, b=87.0, op=multiply)
2026-07-08 10:30:20 | INFO | mcp.server | Tool result: calculator ā {'success': True, 'data': {'result': 3915.0}}
2026-07-08 10:30:20 | INFO | mcp.client | Tool calculator completed in 0.023sš MCP Learning Notes
What is MCP?
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a standardized protocol for connecting AI models to external tools and data sources. Think of it as a "USB-C for AI" ā a universal interface that lets any AI assistant use any tool without custom integrations.
How MCP Registers Tools
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
mcp = FastMCP("My Server")
@mcp.tool(
name="calculator",
description="Perform arithmetic operations"
)
def calculator(a: float, b: float, operation: str) -> str:
# FastMCP auto-generates a JSON Schema from the function signature:
# {
# "type": "object",
# "properties": {
# "a": {"type": "number"},
# "b": {"type": "number"},
# "operation": {"type": "string"}
# },
# "required": ["a", "b", "operation"]
# }
...When @mcp.tool() is called:
FastMCP inspects the function's type hints
Generates a JSON Schema for the inputs
Stores the tool in an internal registry
When
list_tools()is called, returns all registered schemas
How the Client Discovers Tools
from mcp import ClientSession, StdioServerParameters
from mcp.client.stdio import stdio_client
# 1. Define how to launch the server
server_params = StdioServerParameters(
command="uv",
args=["run", "python", "-m", "server.server"]
)
# 2. Connect via stdio
async with stdio_client(server_params) as (read, write):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
# 3. Initialize the session (handshake)
await session.initialize()
# 4. Discover all tools
tools = await session.list_tools()
# tools.tools ā list of Tool objects with name, description, inputSchema
# 5. Call a specific tool
result = await session.call_tool("calculator", {"a": 10, "b": 20, "operation": "add"})How Requests are Serialized
MCP uses JSON-RPC 2.0 over the stdio transport:
// Client ā Server (request)
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 1,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "calculator",
"arguments": {"a": 10, "b": 20, "operation": "add"}
}
}
// Server ā Client (response)
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 1,
"result": {
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": "{\"success\": true, \"data\": {\"result\": 30.0}}"
}
]
}
}How Transport Works
This project uses stdio transport:
The client spawns the server as a subprocess
JSON-RPC messages flow through the subprocess's stdin (requests) and stdout (responses)
This is why we never
print()to stdout in the server ā it would corrupt the protocol!
Other MCP transports include:
SSE (Server-Sent Events): HTTP-based, good for remote servers
Streamable HTTP: Newer HTTP transport for production use
How MCP Differs from REST
Aspect | REST API | MCP |
Discovery | You need documentation/OpenAPI spec |
|
Protocol | HTTP request/response | JSON-RPC 2.0 (bidirectional) |
Schema | OpenAPI (optional) | JSON Schema (built-in) |
Transport | Always HTTP | stdio, SSE, Streamable HTTP |
Standardization | Varies per API | One protocol for all tools |
AI Integration | Custom per model | Universal ā any model, any tool |
How to Add a New Tool
Adding a tool takes 3 steps:
Business logic ā Add a function to
server/tools.py:
def my_tool(input_param: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Do something useful."""
return ToolResponse.ok(result="Hello!")Validation (optional) ā Add a Pydantic model to
server/models.py:
class MyToolInput(BaseModel):
input_param: str = Field(..., min_length=1)Registration ā Add a
@mcp.tool()decorator inserver/server.py:
@mcp.tool(name="my_tool", description="Does something useful")
def tool_my_tool(input_param: str) -> str:
return json.dumps(my_tool(input_param))That's it! The client will auto-discover the new tool on next connection.
ā ļø Common Errors
Error | Cause | Solution |
| Running from wrong directory |
|
| Missing | Run |
| Server failed to start | Check |
| Typo in operation name | Use: add, subtract, multiply, divide |
| b=0 with divide operation | Expected ā handled gracefully |
| City not in mock data | Use: Jaipur, Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Kolkata |
| Printing to stdout in server | Always use logging or stderr |
š® Future Improvements
Add LLM integration for intelligent intent parsing
Implement SSE transport for remote server access
Add tool caching and rate limiting
Build a web-based UI alongside the CLI
Add unit tests for each tool
Implement MCP Resources and Prompts (beyond Tools)
Add authentication and authorization
Create a tool that chains multiple other tools
š License
MIT License ā Feel free to use this for learning and education.
Built as an educational project to understand the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
Available Tools
5 toolscalculatorA
Perform arithmetic operations on two numbers. Supported operations: add, subtract, multiply, divide.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Yes | ||
| b | Yes | ||
| operation | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It describes supported operations but omits edge cases like division by zero or input validation. Basic transparency but not comprehensive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no redundancy. Front-loaded key info (purpose and operations). Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with output schema, description covers purpose and supported operations. Could mention error handling or output details for full completeness, but it is largely sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. Description mentions 'two numbers' and 'supported operations' but does not specify exact string values for operation (e.g., 'add', '+'). Adds some meaning beyond schema but lacks precision.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it performs arithmetic operations on two numbers and lists supported operations. The name 'calculator' reinforces this, and sibling tools are unrelated, making its purpose distinct.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Clear context for usage: arithmetic operations. While no explicit when-not or alternatives given, sibling tools are clearly different, so an agent can infer appropriate use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
current_timeA
Get the current UTC time in ISO 8601 format. No input required.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description takes full responsibility. It discloses the output format (ISO 8601) and the timezone (UTC), which is sufficient for this read-only, non-destructive tool. No hidden behaviors are implied.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two short, direct sentences. Every word is necessary and front-loaded with the key purpose. No verbose or redundant content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (no parameters, has output schema), the description is fully complete. It specifies the timezone, format, and that no input is needed. No additional context is required.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly notes 'No input required,' adding no unnecessary parameter information. No schema details to compensate for.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Get the current UTC time in ISO 8601 format.' It uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('current UTC time'), and it is distinct from sibling tools like calculator or weather.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly says 'No input required,' guiding the agent on invocation. While it doesn't mention when not to use it, the tool is self-contained and has no obvious alternatives among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
random_quoteA
Get a random inspirational quote. No input required.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses that the tool returns an inspirational quote and requires no input. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries full burden and does so adequately, though it could mention if the quote is truly random or fetched from a source.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise, using only two sentences with no unnecessary words. It front-loads the main action and resource, and every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with no parameters and a clear purpose. An output schema exists but is not described; however, for a random quote tool, the return format is likely obvious. The description is complete enough for use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. The description correctly notes 'No input required,' so no additional parameter information is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool gets a random inspirational quote, and the sibling tools (calculator, current_time, etc.) are all different in functionality, so there is no ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states 'No input required,' which implies the tool is ready to use without preparation. However, it does not explicitly say when to use it versus alternatives, but given the unique purpose, it is sufficient.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
uuid_generatorA
Generate a random UUID (version 4). No input required.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description provides basic behavior (random, version 4) but does not detail output format or any side effects. An output schema exists to supplement.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is complete given the tool's simplicity: no parameters, and an output schema likely defines the return value.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the description explicitly states 'No input required,' which is sufficient. Baseline 4 for 0 parameters with full schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool generates a random UUID (version 4) with no input, which is specific and distinct from sibling tools like calculator or weather.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description indicates that no input is needed, implying straightforward usage. It does not explicitly discuss when not to use, but the simplicity makes it clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
weatherA
Get mock weather data for an Indian city. Supported cities: Jaipur, Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Pune.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| city | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses the mock nature of the data but lacks details about error handling, rate limits, or what happens with unsupported cities. A 3 is adequate for a simple read tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description consists of two concise, front-loaded sentences. Every sentence adds valueāthe first states the tool's purpose, the second provides actionable city options.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the output schema exists, return values are documented. The tool is simple with one required parameter and no nested objects. The description fully covers usage context with the city list.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It implicitly covers the 'city' parameter by listing supported cities, adding meaning beyond the schema's bare type. However, it doesn't explain parameter format or optional details.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'mock weather data' with a clear scope 'for an Indian city'. It distinguishes itself from siblings (calculator, current_time, etc.) which are unrelated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description lists supported cities, providing context. No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use is needed since siblings are unrelated. A score of 4 reflects clear context without exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
5 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
calculator - First observed
current_time - First observed
random_quote - First observed
uuid_generator - First observed
weather
TDQS
Each tool serves a distinct purpose: calculator for arithmetic, current_time for time, random_quote for quotes, uuid_generator for UUIDs, and weather for mock weather data. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
All tool names are lowercase, descriptive, and use underscores where needed. They follow a consistent pattern of terse but clear naming.
With 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for a learning/demo server. Each tool provides a distinct utility without being overwhelming or too sparse.
The set covers several typical utility functions (math, time, random, identification, weather). A minor gap could be string manipulation or unit conversion, but for a learning server it is adequately complete.
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for generating rough-draft project plans from natural-language prompts.
MCP server for progressive tool usage at any scale (see https://klavis.ai)
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA basic educational MCP server that provides simple tools for mathematical calculations, text manipulation, and time retrieval. Designed for learning MCP implementation patterns and development purposes.-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA basic Model Context Protocol server implementation that demonstrates core MCP functionality including tools and resources. Provides weather alerts through the Weather API and serves as a learning example for MCP development.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn educational MCP server that teaches implementing the Model Context Protocol from scratch, enabling AI models to discover and invoke tools via JSON-RPC over stdio.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA learning-purpose MCP server providing tools for arithmetic calculation, current time retrieval, and text analysis.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/somyabhadada/mcp_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server