MCP Server for SAP OData v4
Allows calling SAP OData v4 actions, such as scheduling background jobs, via MCP-compatible AI clients.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@MCP Server for SAP OData v4schedule a background job to run payroll"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
MCP Server for SAP OData v4
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that exposes SAP OData v4 actions as AI-callable tools. Designed to be used with MCP-compatible AI clients such as Claude.
Tools
Tool | Description |
| Smoke test — returns a hello message |
| Calls a SAP OData v4 action with a given option |
Related MCP server: SAP OData MCP Server
Setup
Clone the repo:
git clone https://github.com/your-username/mcp.git
cd mcpInstall dependencies:
npm installCopy
.env.exampleto.envand fill in your SAP credentials:
cp .env.example .envBuild the TypeScript source:
npm run buildStart the MCP server:
npm startConfiguration
Variable | Description |
| Base URL of your SAP OData v4 service |
| SAP username |
| SAP password |
| SAP client number (required) |
| OData action path (e.g. |
Requirements
Node.js 18+
A SAP system exposing an OData v4 service
License
ISC
Available Tools
2 toolshelloD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
schedule_background_jobD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| program_name | Yes | Name of the ABAP program to execute | |
| scrambleoption | Yes | Scramble option to send to SAP, for example SCRD | |
| job_name | Yes | Name to assign to the background job |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
hello - First observed
schedule_background_job
TDQS
Only two tools with distinct names, so they are unlikely to be confused. However, the lack of descriptions for 'hello' introduces some ambiguity about its purpose.
No consistent naming pattern: 'hello' is arbitrary while 'schedule_background_job' follows a verb_noun structure, indicating a mismatch.
Two tools are grossly insufficient for an SAP OData v4 server, which would typically require many tools for CRUD operations on entities.
The tool set lacks any OData-specific operations (e.g., read, create, update, delete entities), making it severely incomplete for the stated domain.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
- golemryOAuthcom.golemry
Create and manage scheduled, guarded AI agent jobs with built-in quality control and 900+ connectors
- StackOneOAuthcom.stackone
Give AI agents 30,000+ safe, token-optimized actions across Workday, SAP, Oracle + hundreds more.
- mcp-serverOAuthcom.make
Give your AI agents the tools to build, manage, and run automation workflows.
Build, validate, deploy — HTTP APIs, cron jobs, webhooks and MCP tools — from your AI client.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTransforms SAP S/4HANA or ECC systems into conversational AI interfaces by exposing OData services as dynamic MCP tools. Enables natural language interactions with ERP data for querying, creating, updating, and deleting business entities.661MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to integrate with SAP systems via OData REST APIs for querying entity sets, performing CRUD operations, and executing function imports. It features automatic service discovery, CSRF token management, and smart connection handling without requiring the SAP RFC SDK.1112-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes SAP S/4HANA OData services as tools for LLMs, enabling users to list and create sales orders via the Model Context Protocol. It integrates with SAP BTP using the SAP Cloud SDK to provide secure access to enterprise data through natural language.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with SAP S/4HANA systems via OData, allowing service discovery, metadata exploration, field value retrieval, and CRUD operations through natural language.45-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shahidla/MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server