AgentExecMPC
Containerized deployment for secure execution environment, with configuration options for both STDIO and SSE transports
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@AgentExecMPCrun a Python script to analyze this CSV file"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
AgentExecMCP
A FastMCP server providing core execution capabilities for AI agents, packaged in Docker for secure and easy deployment.
⚡ Quick Start
Get up and running in 2 minutes: see QUICKSTART.md.
Related MCP server: Sandbox MCP
📋 Table of Contents
🚀 Features
Shell Execution: Run bash commands with timeout and safety controls
Multi-Language Code Execution: Python, Node.js, and Go support with optimized execution
Package Management: Install packages via pip, npm, and go modules
Multiple Transports: stdio and SSE
Docker Deployment: Containerized for consistent execution environment
MCP Protocol: Standards-compliant Model Context Protocol
Safety Controls: Non-root execution, timeouts, concurrency limits
Claude Desktop Integration: Works seamlessly with Claude Desktop via SSE transport
Go Optimization: Go code execution with CGO_ENABLED=0 for improved compatibility
🛠️ Make Commands
AgentExecMCP includes a comprehensive Makefile that makes setup and management super easy. All commands are designed to be user-friendly for both technical and non-technical users.
Quick Start Commands
make help # Show all available commands with descriptions
make quick-start # Build and run with SSE transport (recommended)Core Commands
make build # Build the Docker container
make run # Run with STDIO transport (interactive)
make run-sse # Run with SSE transport (for Claude Desktop)Management Commands
make status # Show container status
make logs # Show container logs (follows log output)
make health # Check if server is responding
make stop # Stop all running containers
make shell # Open shell in running containerDevelopment Commands
make lint # Run ruff linter and formatterMaintenance Commands
make test # Test basic functionality
make clean # Remove containers and images
make workspace # Create workspace directoryExample Workflow
# First time setup
make quick-start # Builds and starts everything
make install-claude-config # Sets up Claude Desktop
# Daily usage
make status # Check if running
make logs # View output
make stop # Stop when done
# Troubleshooting
make clean # Clean everything
make quick-start # Fresh start🖥️ Claude Desktop Integration
AgentExecMCP works seamlessly with Claude Desktop using SSE transport. This is perfect for local development and testing.
Easy Setup with Make (Recommended)
Super simple 3-step setup:
Start AgentExecMCP:
make quick-startInstall Claude Desktop configuration:
make install-claude-configRestart Claude Desktop and look for the MCP tools icon! 🎉
Manual Setup (if you prefer)
Start the SSE server:
docker run -d --name AgentExecMCP-claude -p 8000:8000 -e MCP_TRANSPORT=sse AgentExecMCPConfigure Claude Desktop:
Open your Claude Desktop configuration file:
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonWindows:
%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
Add the following configuration:
{ "mcpServers": { "AgentExecMCP": { "command": "npx", "args": [ "mcp-remote", "http://localhost:8000/sse" ] } } }Restart Claude Desktop and look for the MCP tools icon
Test the Integration
Try these commands in Claude Desktop:
"Run a shell command to list files"
"Execute some Python code to calculate 2+2"
"Install the requests package using pip"
Troubleshooting
Check server status:
make statusView logs:
make logsRestart server:
make stop && make quick-start
Prerequisites for Claude Desktop
Node.js and npm installed on your system
Docker running with the AgentExecMCP container
Claude Desktop latest version
The mcp-remote package will be automatically installed by npx when first used.
🖥️ Cursor Integration
AgentExecMCP works seamlessly with the Cursor IDE using the same SSE transport and configuration as Claude Desktop.
Manual Setup (for Cursor)
Start the SSE server:
make quick-startConfigure Cursor:
Open your Cursor mcp configuration file (for example
~/.cursor/mcp.json) and add the following:{ "mcpServers": { "AgentExecMCP": { "command": "npx", "args": [ "mcp-remote", "http://localhost:8000/sse" ] } } }
🔧 MCP Tools
1. Shell Tool
Execute shell commands with safety controls.
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 1,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "shell",
"arguments": {
"request": {
"command": "echo 'Hello World!'",
"timeout": 60,
"cwd": "/workspace"
}
}
}
}2. Execute Code Tool
Run code snippets in Python, Node.js, or Go with optimized execution.
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 2,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "execute_code",
"arguments": {
"request": {
"language": "python",
"code": "print('Hello from Python!')\nprint(2 + 2)",
"timeout": 60
}
}
}
}Go Code Example:
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 2,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "execute_code",
"arguments": {
"request": {
"language": "go",
"code": "package main\nimport \"fmt\"\nfunc main() {\n fmt.Println(\"Hello from Go!\")\n}",
"timeout": 60
}
}
}
}Features:
Python: Full Python 3.x environment with standard library
Node.js: Node.js runtime with npm packages
Go: Optimized execution with CGO_ENABLED=0 for better compatibility
Automatic cleanup: Temporary files are created and cleaned up automatically
Error handling: Compilation and runtime errors are properly captured
3. Install Package Tool
Install packages using various package managers.
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 3,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "install_package",
"arguments": {
"request": {
"package_manager": "pip",
"package": "requests",
"version": "2.32.0"
}
}
}
}🌐 Client Connection Examples
FastMCP Client (Python)
from fastmcp import Client
import asyncio
async def main():
# Connect via stdio to local container
async with Client("docker run -i --rm AgentExecMCP") as client:
result = await client.call_tool("shell", {"request": {"command": "echo 'Hello!'"}})
print(result[0].text)
# Connect via SSE to HTTP server
async with Client("http://localhost:8000/sse") as client:
tools = await client.list_tools()
print(f"Available tools: {[tool.name for tool in tools]}")
asyncio.run(main())🔒 Security Features
Non-root execution: Runs as
agentuser (UID 10001)Sandboxed workspace: All operations in
/workspacedirectoryTimeout controls: Configurable timeouts (default 60s, max 300s)
Concurrency limits: Maximum 4 concurrent processes
Input validation: Size limits and parameter validation
Process cleanup: Automatic cleanup of running processes
🌍 Environment
The container includes:
Ubuntu 22.04 base image
Python 3.13.3 with pip package manager
Node.js 20.19.2 with npm
Go 1.23.4 with modules
Development tools: git, curl, wget, build-essential
Utilities: jq, ripgrep, fd-find, htop
📡 MCP Protocol Support
The server implements the Model Context Protocol (MCP) 2024-11-05 specification with multiple transport options:
STDIO: Default transport for local tools and command-line usage
SSE: Server-Sent Events transport for HTTP deployment and Claude Desktop
🛠️ Development
Local Development
# Install dependencies
uv sync
# Run server locally (stdio)
uv run python -m app.main
# Run server with SSE transport
MCP_TRANSPORT=sse uv run python -m app.mainTesting
The server has been tested with:
✅ MCP protocol compliance across all transports
✅ All three tools (shell, execute_code, install_package)
✅ Multi-language code execution with package imports
✅ Package installation and verification
✅ Docker container deployment
✅ Claude Desktop integration via SSE transport
✅ Safety and timeout controls
📋 Requirements
Docker (for containerized deployment)
Python 3.12+ (for local development)
UV package manager (for dependency management)
Node.js and npm (for Claude Desktop integration)
🎯 Use Cases
Claude Desktop Integration: Provide execution capabilities directly in Claude Desktop
AI Agent Execution: Provide safe execution environment for AI agents
Code Sandboxing: Run untrusted code in isolated container
Multi-language Development: Support Python, Node.js, and Go workflows
Package Management: Install and test packages across ecosystems
Shell Automation: Execute system commands with proper controls
Kubernetes Deployment: Scale execution capabilities in cloud environments
📄 License
This project is licensed under the Apache License 2.0 - see the LICENSE file for details.
This project follows the guiding principles of being fast to build, reproducible, safe by default, and extensible.
Available Tools
3 toolsexecute_codeA
Execute code snippets in Python, Node.js, or Go with automatic environment setup.
This tool creates temporary files and executes code in isolated environments
with proper cleanup and timeout handling. Supports multiple programming
languages with their respective runtimes.
Supported Languages:
- Python: Full Python 3.x environment with standard library
- Node.js/JavaScript: Node.js runtime with npm packages
- Go: Go compiler and runtime environment with CGO_ENABLED=0
Features:
- Automatic temporary file management
- Language-specific execution environments
- Configurable timeout controls
- Detailed execution feedback
- Secure code isolation
- Temporary files are deleted after execution; code is non-persistent. Use the shell tool to create reusable scripts.
Args:
request: Code execution parameters including code, language, and timeout
Returns:
ExecutionResponse: Complete execution results with output, errors,
performance metrics, and success status
Examples:
- Python: {"code": "print('Hello World')", "language": "python"}
- Node.js: {"code": "console.log('Hello World')", "language": "node"}
- Go: {"code": "package main\nfunc main() { println("Hello") }", "language": "go"}
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description fully discloses behavioral traits: temporary files, isolated environments, proper cleanup, timeout handling, non-persistent code, and secure isolation. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with sections, bullet points, and examples. Every sentence adds value, and the main action is front-loaded. No redundant text.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (multiple languages, timeout, isolation), the description covers all key aspects: supported languages, features, execution details, and return type. No output schema, but the description explains the response structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'request' is a nested object with its properties described in the schema. The description adds value by listing the included parameters (code, language, timeout), providing examples, and explaining features, but does not add significant meaning beyond the schema's subfield descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool executes code snippets in Python, Node.js, or Go with automatic environment setup. It lists supported languages and features, and distinguishes from sibling tool 'shell' by stating to use shell for reusable scripts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit guidance on when to use (execute code snippets) and when not to (not for persistent scripts), with alternatives mentioned ('Use the shell tool to create reusable scripts'). It includes examples for each language.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
install_packageA
Install packages using pip, npm, or Go modules with version control.
This tool provides a unified interface for package installation across
different programming environments. Supports version pinning and provides
detailed installation feedback with proper error handling.
Supported Package Managers:
- pip: Python package installer (PyPI packages)
- npm: Node.js package manager (npm registry)
- go: Go module system (Go packages)
Features:
- Version pinning support
- Installation progress tracking
- Dependency resolution
- Extended timeout for large packages
- Comprehensive error reporting
Args:
request: Package installation parameters including name, manager, and version
Returns:
ExecutionResponse: Installation results with output, any errors,
and installation success status
Examples:
- Install Python package: {"package": "requests", "package_manager": "pip"}
- Install with version: {"package": "lodash", "package_manager": "npm", "version": "4.17.21"}
- Install Go module: {"package": "github.com/gin-gonic/gin", "package_manager": "go"}
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations were provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions version pinning, progress tracking, dependency resolution, extended timeout, and error reporting. This provides good insight, though it does not explicitly state if the operation is safe or destructive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with sections and examples, but it is somewhat verbose. The key information is front-loaded, though some repetition could be trimmed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity and good schema descriptions, the description is mostly complete. It mentions the return type ExecutionResponse, which compensates for the lack of an output schema. However, it could include more detail on error handling or preconditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Parameter descriptions in the schema are detailed, so schema coverage is high (100%). The tool description adds value by summarizing version pinning and providing examples beyond the schema, earning a 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it installs packages using pip, npm, or Go modules with version control. The verb 'install' and resource 'packages' are specific and distinguish it from siblings execute_code and shell.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use the tool (package installation across environments) but lacks explicit exclusions or alternatives. Knowledge of siblings suggests alternative tools for code execution or shell commands.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
shellA
Execute shell commands in a secure sandboxed environment.
This tool allows executing arbitrary shell commands with built-in safety controls
including timeout limits, working directory restrictions, and process cleanup.
Perfect for file operations, system commands, and shell scripting tasks.
Features:
- Configurable timeout (default: 60s, max: 300s)
- Custom working directory support
- Automatic process cleanup
- Sandboxed execution in workspace
- Comprehensive error handling
Args:
request: Shell execution parameters including command, timeout, and working directory
Returns:
ExecutionResponse: Complete execution results with stdout, stderr, exit code,
duration, and success status
Examples:
- List files: {"command": "ls -la"}
- Create directory: {"command": "mkdir -p /workspace/new_folder"}
- Run with timeout: {"command": "long_running_task", "timeout": 120}
- Custom directory: {"command": "pwd", "cwd": "/workspace/subfolder"}
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| request | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses key traits: sandboxed execution, configurable timeout (60s default, 300s max), working directory support, automatic cleanup, and error handling. However, it omits details like network access restrictions or persistency of file changes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with sections (intro, features, args, returns, examples) and uses bullet points. It front-loads the purpose. However, it is somewhat verbose; e.g., 'sandboxed execution' appears twice and some feature points could be merged.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description explains returns (stdout, stderr, exit code, duration, success status). It covers timeout, working directory, error handling, and command constraints (64KB limit from schema, but not in description). It lacks mention of input size limit and does not detail sandbox restrictions, but overall is fairly complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% for the top-level parameter 'request', so the description must compensate. It lists 'command, timeout, and working directory' in Args and provides examples, but does not explain each parameter's semantics beyond what the schema already provides. The examples add value, but not enough to fully compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Execute shell commands in a secure sandboxed environment' with specific verb-resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools 'execute_code' and 'install_package' by focusing on arbitrary shell commands for file operations, system commands, and scripting.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context: 'Perfect for file operations, system commands, and shell scripting tasks.' It implicitly differentiates from siblings but does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternative suggestions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
3 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
execute_code - First observed
install_package - First observed
shell
TDQS
Each tool targets a distinct function: executing code, installing packages, and running shell commands. There is no overlap in their purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (execute_code, install_package, shell). 'Shell' is a noun but functions as a clear command name.
With only 3 tools, the server is tightly scoped for code execution and environment management. Each tool serves a necessary role without clutter.
The set covers core operations: running code, installing packages, and shell access. A minor gap is the lack of package uninstallation or listing, but the essential workflows are present.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for building and testing AI agents with multi-model experimentation and insights.
MCP server connecting AI agents to 100+ apps (Gmail, Slack, Notion, GitHub) via one-click OAuth.
MCP server for AI agents to plan, verify, and deploy Cloudflare-native apps.
MCP server for secureFlows: token-free URL builders and integration-linting tools for AI agents.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA server that uses the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to allow AI agents to safely execute shell commands on a host system.12,1399MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables LLMs to run ANY code safely in isolated Docker containers.121MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA secure MCP server for shell operations, terminal management, and process control, enabling AI assistants to safely execute commands and manage interactive sessions.132046MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for secure, session-based Python code execution in Docker containers, enabling LLM applications to run code, manage state, and access files.9MIT
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/realugbun/AgentExecMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server