knot
The knot server enables AI agents to intelligently explore, search, and navigate large codebases using semantic vector search and graph-based structural analysis.
Semantic & Structural Code Search (
search_hybrid_context): Find code by natural language queries (e.g., "user authentication"), combining vector embeddings for semantic similarity with graph analysis for architectural relationships — returns file paths, line numbers, signatures, docstrings, and cross-repository dependencies.Reverse Dependency Lookup (
find_callers): Identify all code that calls, extends, implements, or references a specific function, method, or class — useful for impact analysis before refactoring, dead code detection, and understanding call chains. Supports exact names or signature fragments (e.g.,handle(Request).File Structure Inspection (
explore_file): Get a structural outline of any source file — lists all classes, interfaces, methods, and properties with signatures, docstrings, and line numbers, without reading the entire file.Multi-language support: Java, Kotlin, and TypeScript/JavaScript/Node.js for core code intelligence; HTML and CSS/SCSS also indexed.
Multi-repository filtering: All tools support an optional
repo_nameparameter to scope results to a specific indexed repository.Read-only operations: All tools are purely read-only with no side effects on the codebase or databases.
AI Agent Integration: Exposes capabilities via MCP (Model Context Protocol), allowing AI clients (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, etc.) to leverage knot for autonomous code analysis.
Supports indexing and analysis of Angular web components through HTML parsing, enabling cross-language linking between JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for full-stack SPA analysis.
Provides CSS/SCSS stylesheet indexing with class/ID selector extraction and variable tracking, enabling unified HTML/CSS discovery and cross-language search capabilities.
Supports CommonJS TypeScript file analysis as part of complete TypeScript/TSX/CTS language support for modern JavaScript/TypeScript codebases.
Provides Docker-based deployment options for universal compatibility across platforms, including containerized execution of the indexer, CLI tool, and MCP server.
Supports configuration via .env files for setting repository paths and database credentials during codebase indexing and analysis.
Provides comprehensive JavaScript/Node.js analysis including vanilla JS, Node.js, and module systems (.js, .mjs, .cjs, .jsx) with full cross-language linking capabilities.
Provides complete Kotlin codebase analysis with support for classes, interfaces, objects, companion objects, functions, methods, and properties using tree-sitter-kotlin-ng grammar.
Uses Markdown for documentation and skill files, including .knot-agent.md for teaching LLMs how to use the CLI tool for autonomous code analysis.
Integrates with Neo4j graph database for storing architectural relationships via call graphs, enabling structural navigation and reverse dependency analysis.
Supports Node.js module systems and JavaScript analysis as part of the hybrid web ecosystem with cross-language linking capabilities.
Extracts id and className attributes from JSX/TSX React components for unified HTML/CSS discovery and cross-language analysis in web applications.
Provides complete TypeScript/TSX analysis including modern JavaScript/TypeScript codebases with full cross-language linking and architectural relationship extraction.
knot
knot is a high-performance codebase indexer that extracts structural and semantic information from source code, enabling AI agents to understand, analyze, and navigate large code repositories. Currently supports Java, Kotlin, TypeScript, JavaScript/Node.js, Rust, Python, Groovy, C/C++, C#, HTML, and CSS/SCSS, plus Build Systems (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, Jenkins pipeline, Cargo.toml, MSBuild .csproj + Directory.Packages.props), Configuration Files (YAML, JSON, .properties — optional), Kubernetes + Helm (optional), and Cross-Repo Dependency Linking with full cross-language linking.
For recent release notes see CHANGELOG.md.
The indexer automatically builds:
Vector Search Database (Qdrant) — semantic understanding via embeddings
Graph Database (Neo4j) — architectural relationships via call graphs
This dual-database approach powers both:
MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server — Exposes three tools to any LLM client (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, Cursor, etc.)
CLI Tool — Standalone
knotcommand for terminal and scripting environments
Knot in action
CLI — instant reverse dependency lookup
MCP — JSON-RPC protocol for AI agents
🧮 Token Efficiency — Measured, Not Claimed
An LLM agent exploring an unfamiliar codebase pays for every byte it reads. Without an index it greps and then reads whole files; with knot it receives a targeted answer. The difference was measured on three real indexed repositories across nine realistic exploration tasks:
Repo | Lang | Task | knot tokens | Read-the-code tokens | Reduction |
spring-ai | Java | discovery — how does the chat client run the advisor chain? | 1 092 | 10 168 | 89.3% |
spring-ai | Java | callers — who uses | 8 808 | 15 554 | 43.4% |
spring-ai | Java | explore — structure of | 4 865 | 7 838 | 37.9% |
puppeteer | TypeScript | discovery — how is a CDP session created? | 609 | 4 149 | 85.3% |
puppeteer | TypeScript | callers — who calls | 1 004 | 39 878 | 97.5% |
puppeteer | TypeScript | explore — structure of the | 7 287 | 25 300 | 71.2% |
knot | Rust | discovery — how are call intents resolved? | 594 | 14 824 | 96.0% |
knot | Rust | callers — who calls | 461 | 10 949 | 95.8% |
knot | Rust | explore — structure of the graph query module | 978 | 12 103 | 91.9% |
TOTAL | — | 9 tasks | 25 698 | 140 763 | 81.7% |
≈ 5.5× fewer tokens for the same nine questions — 115 000 tokens saved, enough to keep a long refactoring session inside a single context window.
Both sides are measured on the exact bytes an LLM would receive as tool
output, counted with OpenAI's cl100k_base tokenizer (tiktoken):
Task | knot side | Read-the-code side |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| full read of the file |
The baseline is deliberately generous, so the measured saving is a lower bound:
greps are restricted to the source files of the language (
-t java,-t ts,-t rust) — no changelogs, no generated docs, nonode_modules;for
discoverythe baseline is given oracle file selection: it reads only the files that answer the question, with zero wasted reads;for
callersit reads at most 5 files, while a rigorous impact analysis would need every file with a textual hit.
Honest caveats: knot's cost scales with the number of results, not with repo
size. The weakest row (spring-ai / ToolCallingManager, 43%) is a symbol with
156 references — knot enumerates all of them with exact call sites, while the
capped baseline reads only 5 files and still cannot tell a call from a comment.
The explore rows for large classes are also the least favourable, because
signatures plus docstrings are a large fraction of a well-documented file.
Repositories measured (as indexed): spring-ai 2 406 files / 25 733 entities,
puppeteer 1 832 files / 19 310 entities, knot 222 files / 4 000 entities.
Raw measurements are stored in
.perf_metrics/token_savings.json.
pip install tiktoken # optional: falls back to a chars/4 estimate
# edit the `root` paths in scripts/token_savings_tasks.json to match your checkouts
python3 scripts/token_savings_benchmark.py \
--config scripts/token_savings_tasks.json \
--save-json .perf_metrics/token_savings.jsonThe task definitions live in
scripts/token_savings_tasks.json and the
harness in
scripts/token_savings_benchmark.py;
point them at any repository you have indexed to measure your own codebase.
Related MCP server: MCP-RAG
✨ Key Features
🔍 Code Intelligence Tools
search_hybrid_context: Semantic + structural search. Find code by meaning, class name, method signature, docstrings, or comments. Returns full context including dependencies.find_callers: Reverse dependency lookup. Identify dead code, perform impact analysis, or understand the full call chain of any function/method. When multiple entities share the same name (e.g.,find_nearest_entity_by_linein different files), results are automatically grouped by target showing which specific entity each caller references. Supports cross-repository call resolution viaDEPENDS_ONgraph edges. For JVM languages (Java/Kotlin/Groovy) it also surfaces method-levelOVERRIDESedges bidirectionally — an Overridden by group listing subtype implementations/overrides and an Overrides group listing the supertype methods a method implements/overrides.explore_file: File anatomy inspection. Quickly see all classes, interfaces, methods, and functions in a file with signatures and documentation.list_repo_dependencies(MCP) /knot deps(CLI): Dependency graph visualization. Show which repositories depend on each other, forward and reverse, with transitive resolution.list_repositories/knot repos: Repository inventory. List every indexed repository along with its entity count, file count, build system, and primary language. Supports optional case-insensitive name filtering via--filter(CLI) orfilterparameter (MCP). Useful for orientation, sanity-checking indexing runs, and discovering which languages and build systems are present in the workspace.
🏗️ Multi-Language Support
Java: Full AST extraction with package-aware FQN resolution (e.g.,
com.example.app.UserService), class inheritance (EXTENDS), interface implementation (IMPLEMENTS), annotation tracking, and field-access method invocation resolutionKotlin: Complete support for Kotlin codebases with classes, interfaces, objects, companion objects, functions, methods, and properties. Fully compatible with tree-sitter-kotlin-ng grammar.
C#: Full C# support via
tree-sitter-c-sharp. Extracts classes, interfaces, structs, records (bothrecord classandrecord struct), enums, methods, constructors, properties, fields (withconstdetection), delegates, events, indexers, operators, local functions, and namespaces withCSharp*entity kinds. Namespace-qualified FQNs (MyApp.Services.UserService.GetUserAsync) work across both file-scoped (C# 10+) and block-form namespaces, including nested namespaces and nested types. Thebase_listheuristic splits: Base, IFaceintoEXTENDS/IMPLEMENTSusing theIPascalCaseconvention (structs and interfaces are deterministic), generic arguments are stripped (IRepository<User>→IRepository), XML doc comments (///) become docstrings, and attributes ([Obsolete]) are captured as decorators. Calls through field-typed receivers resolve to the exact implementation method, and C#virtual/overrideplus interface implementation produce method-levelOVERRIDESedges. MSBuild/NuGet:.csprojfiles are parsed for project identity and dependencies (Central Package Management viaDirectory.Packages.propsis supported); C# repos getbuild_system: "nuget"in the Repository node instead of the prior"none".TypeScript/TSX/CTS: Complete support for modern JavaScript/TypeScript codebases, including CommonJS TypeScript files
JavaScript/Node.js: Vanilla JS, Node.js, and module systems (
.js,.mjs,.cjs,.jsx)Hybrid Web Ecosystem: Cross-language linking between JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for full-stack SPA analysis
HTML: Custom elements (Web Components, Angular),
idandclassattribute indexing for cross-language CSS searchJSX/TSX Attributes: Extracts
idandclassNamefrom React components for unified HTML/CSS discoveryCSS/SCSS: Stylesheet indexing with class/ID selector extraction and variable tracking (CSS/SCSS variables, mixins, functions)
Rust: Struct, enum, union, trait, function, method, module extraction with trait implementation tracking (IMPLEMENTS relationships) and macro invocation references. Methods are indexed with the qualified FQN
Type::method(e.g.,KnotMcpHandler::new,WidgetA::new,Logger::new) and qualified calls from top-level functions resolve to the right target by receiver. Braced import/use capture —use foo::{Bar, Baz}anduse foo::Bar as Bazproduce explicit REFERENCES edges for all imported names, including traits imported solely to bring methods into scope. All Rust entity FQNs are now anchored at the owning crate and module path (e.g.knot::config::Config,knot::pipeline::parser::languages::rust::qualify_rust_fqns), so two crates that declare a type with the same bare name no longer collide. Files outsidesrc/(tests, benches, examples) receive a__fixture::<path>::<Entity>FQN prefix (e.g.__fixture::tests::testing_files::sample::Config), and files without aCargo.tomlancestor receive__loose::<path>::<Entity>, preventing name collisions with real source entities. CONTAINS relationships useenclosing_class_fqnfor exact disambiguation when multiple entities share the same class name. The on-disk index state file (.knot/index_state.json) carries aversionfield; opening a state file from an older version prints an error with instructions to runknot-indexer --clean.Python: Full Python extraction with class, function, method support, constants, module-level imports,
ValueReferencetracking for keyword arguments, class inheritance (EXTENDS), decorator extraction (@property,@staticmethod,@route(...),@dataclass), generic type hints (List[str],Optional[Dict],*args/**kwargs), Py2/Py3 exception syntax compatibility, andself.method()resolution with inherited method walking. Capturesclass_definition,function_definition(including async via optionalasyncmodifier), lambda assignments, and distinguishes methods from functions via parent context detection. Class instantiation (ClassName(...)) is automatically redirected toClassName.__init__sofind_callers ClassName.__init__lists every constructor call site (with fallback to inherited__init__via the extends chain); only class/struct kinds trigger the redirect — functions keep the legacy behavior.Groovy: Full Groovy language support via hybrid tree-sitter + ad-hoc lexical parser. Extracts classes, interfaces, traits, enums, typed/
def/quoted methods (incl. Spock specs), constructors, closures, script-level variables, fields/properties with visibility modifiers, nested classes, and decorators. Tracks package FQN and enclosing class relationships. Multi-line signatures (closure default params), assignment-vs-declaration disambiguation, innermost assignment for nested closures, UUID collision fix for duplicate method names,find_callersaccurately tracks private methods including those in anonymousnew AnActionclosures. Inheritance tracking: emitsEXTENDS/IMPLEMENTSreference intents forclass/interface/trait/enumheaders (single-line and multi-line) sofind_callerssurfaces real nextflow-style hierarchies — qualified parents (e.g.extends nextflow.plugin.BasePlugin) and generic-argument stripping (e.g.extends AbstractRepo<Order, Long> → extends AbstractRepo) are supported, and generic bounds (class Box<T extends Comparable>) are correctly not promoted to inheritance edges. Property accessors: bare property declarations (Path baseDir,boolean cacheable) are now indexed asGroovyProperty, and compiler-generatedgetX/setX/isXaccessors are synthesised as first-class method entities soOVERRIDESedges link Groovy properties to interface getter declarations. Comment-stripping prevents Javadoc continuation lines (* The pipeline script name) from producing phantom entities or corrupting scope tracking.Build Systems: Maven
pom.xml(dependencies + plugins via roxmltree), Gradlebuild.gradle(deps + plugins + tasks),Jenkinsfilepipeline (stages + steps), CargoCargo.toml(deps + workspace members + features), and MSBuild.csproj/Directory.Packages.propsextraction. MSBuild resolves project identity (<PackageId>→<AssemblyName>→ file stem), emits aBuildDependencyper<PackageReference>(attribute-form and version-less), and resolves Central Package Management versions from the nearestDirectory.Packages.propsancestor. UTF-8 BOMs are tolerated defensively. Identity markeridentity: package_idis carried in the signature when the project has an explicit<PackageId>so the cross-repo resolver prefers published packages over depth-tied unmarked candidates.Cargo.toml: Rust package manager support with package metadata, features, workspace members, and multi-format dependency parsing (simple, table, git, path).
Configuration Files: YAML (.yml/.yaml), JSON (.json), and Java Properties (.properties) with leaf-key granularity. Special handling for package.json (npm dependencies as BuildDependency, scripts as ConfigProperty).
Varnish Cache: Hand-written parsers for
.vcl(configuration),.vtc(test cases), and.vcc(VMOD C source). VCL extracts backends, probes, ACLs, subroutines (custom + built-in withvcl_*names, including aggregator entities for multi-part built-ins),importdirectives (withasaliases andfrompaths),includeedges,unuseddeclarations, VMOD instantiations, andreq.backend_hintassignments. VTC extractsvarnishtest/vtestcases, servers, clients, varnish instances, logexpect blocks, barriers, and-vcl+backendsynthesised backends (withis_test_context). VCC extracts$Module,$Function,$Object,$Method,$Event,$Restrict, ENUMs, and default parameters. References:Calls,Extends,Implements,References(with intentsVclSubCall,VclBackendRef,VclProbeRef,VclAclRef,VclInclude,VclVmodImport,VclUnusedRef,ValueReference); relationships:UsesBackend,UsesProbe,UsesAcl,Includes,ImportsVmod,DeclaredUnused. The Fastly VCL dialect is detected and skipped (returns empty entities).Kubernetes + Helm: K8s manifest parsing (Deployment, Service, ConfigMap, Secret, Ingress, Namespace) with label/annotation tracking and cross-resource references. Helm chart indexing (Chart.yaml metadata, values.yaml key-value pairs, template variable extraction via {{ .Values.X }}).
C/C++: Complete C/C++ support with namespace-aware FQN resolution (
Engine::MyClass::start), class/struct extraction, function/method tracking, macro definition and usage detection (uppercase identifier heuristic), type reference tracking (declarations,newexpressions), and full call graph analysis. Supports.c,.h,.cpp,.hpp,.cc,.cxx,.hh,.hxxextensions via tree-sitter-c and tree-sitter-cpp parsers. Includes intelligent auto-detection for.hheaders to parse them correctly as C or C++ based on their contents.Markdown: Documentation indexing with
MarkdownDocument(one per.md/.markdownfile) andMarkdownSection(one per ATX heading H1–H6). Section bodies — including paragraphs, fenced code blocks, lists, and tables — are captured intoembed_textfor full semantic search over documentation content, not just heading titles. FQNs are hierarchical and file-scoped (e.g.README.md::Setup > Installation > Linux), so same-named headings in different files or under different parents disambiguate cleanly. Section boundaries respect heading depth: a section's body extends until the next heading of equal or higher level, ensuring### Linuxunder## Installationdoes not bleed into a sibling## Configuration. Headings with inline markdown (backticks, em-dash, links, emoji) parse without losing their bodies, and realstart_line/end_linepositions are computed via tree-sitter for each section.
📚 Rich Comment Extraction
Captures docstrings (JavaDoc, JSDoc) preceding declarations
Extracts inline comments within method/function bodies
Respects nesting boundaries (class comments don't capture method comments)
Intelligently aggregates comment blocks
📊 Dual-Database Architecture
Qdrant: Vector search for semantic code understanding
Neo4j: Graph relationships for structural navigation
🚀 High Performance
Parallel Streaming Pipeline: Overlaps CPU-bound embedding with I/O-bound ingestion via MPSC channels
Incremental Indexing: Uses SHA-256 hashes to skip unchanged files
Real-time Watch Mode: Automatically re-indexes changed files in seconds via
--watchCPU Parallelism: AST extraction via Rayon
Scalable: Configurable batch processing and constant memory footprint (~2GB) regardless of repository size
Performance Benchmarking: Multi-level validation framework
Unit benchmarks: Criterion-based benchmarks for parse, embed, and graph write throughput (
benches/)E2E benchmarks: Full pipeline metrics capture with per-stage timing (
tests/benchmark_e2e.sh)CI regression tracking: Automated baseline comparison against tolerance thresholds (
scripts/compare_perf_metrics.sh)Token efficiency: LLM token cost of knot answers vs reading source files (
scripts/token_savings_benchmark.py) — see Token Efficiency
🛠️ Installation
Prerequisites
Component | Version | Notes |
Docker | 20.10+ | For running Qdrant and Neo4j |
qdrant | 1.x | Vector database (docker) |
neo4j | 5.x | Graph database (docker) |
Option A: Pre-compiled Binaries (macOS & Modern Linux)
Go to the Releases page and download the native executable for your platform.
Install knot binaries (CLI, MCP server, and indexer):
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -LsSf https://github.com/raultov/knot/releases/latest/download/knot-installer.sh | shInstall agent-skills for your AI (Optional): Paste this into your LLM agent (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, etc.):
Install the knot agent skills by following the instructions at: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raultov/knot/master/README.md
The first command installs the knot binary to your PATH. The second (optional) allows your AI assistant to automatically download the agent skill index (.knot-agent.md) and run the installer to extract comprehensive guides for using knot CLI with AI agents and code analysis tools.
System Requirements:
Linux: glibc 2.38+ (Ubuntu 24.04+, Debian 13+, Fedora 39+, Arch)
macOS: Modern versions supported
Windows: Use Docker (Option B)
Option B: Docker (Universal Compatibility)
Docker images provide universal compatibility for any Linux distribution and Windows.
Docker Installation (All Binaries)
Build the image:
docker build -t knot:latest . --network=hostRun the indexer:
# Use --network host to connect to databases running on your host machine
docker run --rm \
-v /path/to/your/repo:/workspace \
-e KNOT_REPO_PATH=/workspace \
-e KNOT_NEO4J_PASSWORD=your-password \
--network host \
knot:latest \
knot-indexerRun the CLI tool:
docker run --rm \
-v /path/to/your/repo:/workspace \
-e KNOT_REPO_PATH=/workspace \
-e KNOT_NEO4J_PASSWORD=your-password \
--network host \
knot:latest \
knot search "user login flow"Run the MCP server:
docker run --rm \
-e KNOT_REPO_PATH=/workspace \
-e KNOT_NEO4J_PASSWORD=your-password \
--network host \
knot:latest \
knot-mcpNote: Uses Debian Trixie (glibc 2.38+) and includes ONNX Runtime for full functionality.
Option C: Install via Cargo
cargo install --git https://github.com/raultov/knotOption D: Build from Source
1. Start infrastructure with Docker:
docker compose up -d2. Clone and build:
git clone https://github.com/raultov/knot
cd knot
cargo build --release3. Configure:
mkdir -p ~/.config/knot
cp .env.example ~/.config/knot/.env
$EDITOR ~/.config/knot/.env # Set KNOT_REPO_PATH and Neo4j credentials4. Index a codebase:
./target/release/knot-indexer5. Query via CLI:
./target/release/knot search "your query"6. Start the MCP server:
./target/release/knot-mcp📖 Usage
🤖 Install Agent Skills (For AI Agents)
Option A: Let an LLM do it
Paste this into any LLM agent (Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor, etc.):
Install the knot agent skills by following the instructions at: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raultov/knot/master/README.md
Option B: Terminal (Manual)
curl -sO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raultov/knot/master/.knot-agent.md && curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raultov/knot/master/scripts/install-agent-skills.sh | bash📥 Quick Downloads (Binaries)
Download knot binaries (CLI + MCP server):
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -LsSf https://github.com/raultov/knot/releases/latest/download/knot-installer.sh | sh📖 Agent-Skills Guides
Comprehensive documentation for using knot tools. The agent skills installer extracts:
search.md — Semantic code discovery guide with examples
callers.md — Reverse dependency lookup with critical usage rules
explore.md — File anatomy inspection guide
deps.md — Repository dependency graph guide
repos.md — Indexed repository inventory
workflows.md — Common patterns and best practices
For quick reference without downloading, see .knot-agent.md.
Using the CLI
The knot CLI provides the same capabilities as the MCP server via command-line commands, making it ideal for:
Terminal-only environments
Bash scripting and automation
CI/CD pipelines
Direct integration with other tools
Three main commands:
knot search — Semantic Code Search
knot search "user authentication" --max-results 10 --repo my-app
knot search "user authentication" --max-results 20 --repo "app-a,app-b" # Union across repos
knot search "user authentication" --max-results 20 --repo all # All indexed repos ('all' or '*')Find code entities by meaning, class names, docstrings, or comments.
knot callers — Reverse Dependency Lookup
knot callers "LoginService" --repo my-app
knot callers "LoginService" --repo "auth-service,billing-service"
knot callers "LoginService" --repo allFind all code that references a specific entity (dead code detection, impact analysis, call chains). When multiple entities share the same name in different files, results are automatically grouped by target with file locations and signatures.
Every caller entry is self-labeling: the owning repository is printed next to each row as (repo: <name>) — in the CLI table, the Markdown answer, and the resolution block — so rows stay attributable when the scope spans multiple repositories:
# References to `LoginService`
Resolved to 1 target by exact name match:
- `auth::service::LoginService` (class) at `src/service.rs:12` (repo: auth-service)
Found 1 reference(s) across all relationship types:
## Calls (1)
- **`signup`** (function) at `src/handlers.rs:88` (repo: auth-service)In the CLI table the Target column is labeled only for genuine cross-repo references (a caller in repo A referencing a target in repo B); the Caller column is always labeled when a repository is known.
knot explore — File Structure Inspection
knot explore "src/services/auth.ts" --repo my-appList all classes, methods, functions in a file with signatures and documentation.
knot deps — Repository Dependency Graph
knot deps my-app --depth 2 # Show forward dependencies (transitive)
knot deps my-app --reverse # Show who depends on this repoVisualize auto-discovered dependencies between indexed repositories with transitive resolution up to 3 levels deep.
knot repos — List Indexed Repositories
knot repos # Table with REPO / BUILD SYSTEM / LANGUAGE / FILES / ENTITIES
knot repos --filter app # Case-insensitive name filter (substring match)
knot repos --output json # Machine-readable list
knot repos --output markdown # GFM table for chat UIsShow the status of every repository currently indexed in the graph database — useful for orientation, sanity-checking that an indexing run completed, and discovering which languages and build systems are present across the workspace. Use --filter to quickly locate a specific repository when working with multiple indexed codebases.
Repository Scope Selection:
Both the CLI --repo/-r flag and MCP repo_name parameter support:
Single repository name:
--repo my-appComma-separated list:
--repo "repo-a,repo-b"(MCP also accepts["repo-a", "repo-b"])Sentinel:
--repo allor--repo "*"(searches every indexed repository)
Note: Multi-repo scope applies a global max_results limit across the union. Increase --max-results when searching across multiple repositories.
For detailed CLI usage guide, see .knot-agent.md — a machine-readable skill that teaches LLMs how to use knot CLI for autonomous code analysis.
Indexing a Codebase
Incremental Indexing (Default)
# First run: indexes all files
knot-indexer --repo-path /path/to/your/repo --neo4j-password secret
# Subsequent runs: only re-indexes changed files (fast!)
knot-indexer --repo-path /path/to/your/repo --neo4j-password secret
# NEW: Real-time Watch mode
knot-indexer --watch --repo-path /path/to/your/repo --neo4j-password secretHow it works:
Tracks file content via SHA-256 hashes in
.knot/index_state.jsonStores the downloaded
fastembedmodel in.knot/fastembed_cache/to keep the workspace cleanAutomatically detects: modified, added, and deleted files
Only re-parses and re-embeds changed files
Preserves graph relationships to unchanged files
Processes entities in memory-efficient 512-entity chunks
Performance:
Initial index (3800 files): ~60 minutes on standard hardware
Incremental update (3 files changed): ~5-10 seconds
Memory usage: Constant ~2GB regardless of repository size
Full Re-Index (Clean Mode)
# Force complete re-index (deletes all existing data)
knot-indexer --clean --repo-path /path/to/your/repo --neo4j-password secretUse --clean when:
You want to rebuild the entire index from scratch
You've changed Tree-sitter queries or embedding models
Troubleshooting indexing issues
Upgrade note (v1.5.1): File paths are now persisted as repo-relative paths with POSIX separators (e.g.
src/pipeline/embed.rs). Upgrading from v1.4.x triggers an automatic full re-index on first run — the on-disk.knot/index_state.jsoncarries a version field that the loader rejects when stale, andknot-indexerthen wipes the repo from both databases before rebuilding. No manual steps required. Entity UUIDs become machine-independent in the process: the same repo indexed from different checkout locations now produces identical UUIDs.
Indexing Progress
The indexer emits [Progress] log lines showing real-time completion across
the whole pipeline (parsing, embedding, ingestion, reference resolution).
The percentage is monotonically non-decreasing and reaches 100% only
once the run genuinely terminates.
Upgrade note (v1.6.2): The percentage now spans the entire pipeline via weighted bands. Previously it measured only file reading and saturated at
100%within seconds of starting, then froze for minutes while embedding and ingestion were still running. Seedocs/specs/indexing_progress_accuracy_plan.mdfor the full design.
Example with 5000 files where 1000 have been parsed and 5,000 entities are half-way through ingestion:
[Progress] [my-repo] 50.0% — files 5000/5000, entities 41600/83200, batch #325 (128 entities)Band table
Phase | Band | Driver |
|
| — |
Parsing |
|
|
Embedding + Ingestion |
|
|
|
| fixed (no sub-counters available) |
|
| forced |
| last computed value | frozen |
A final log line confirms completion:
[Progress] [my-repo] 100.0% — files 5000/5000, entities 83200/83200 — parsing and ingestion complete, resolving references...Library API (knot-server integration)
Callers that need to observe progress programmatically can use the ProgressTracker:
use std::sync::Arc;
use knot::pipeline::{ProgressTracker, run_indexing_pipeline_with_progress};
let progress = Arc::new(ProgressTracker::new());
let progress_clone = Arc::clone(&progress);
// Poll snapshot() from another task while the pipeline runs
tokio::spawn(async move {
loop {
let snap = progress_clone.snapshot();
println!(
"{:.1}% — files {}/{}, entities {}/{}",
snap.percent_complete,
snap.parsed_files,
snap.total_files,
snap.entities_ingested,
snap.total_entities
);
if snap.stage == IndexingStage::Completed || snap.stage == IndexingStage::Failed {
break;
}
tokio::time::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_millis(500)).await;
}
});
run_indexing_pipeline_with_progress(&cfg, &vdb, &gdb, &mut state, progress).await?;The snapshot() method is thread-safe (read-only locks + atomic loads) and returns a
IndexingProgress struct that serializes directly to JSON for REST endpoints.
Running E2E Integration Tests
To ensure indexer stability, run the E2E integration test suite:
# Run all language E2E tests (TypeScript, Java, JavaScript, Web, Kotlin, Rust, ...)
./tests/run_all_e2e_fast.sh
# Run only Kotlin E2E tests
./tests/run_kotlin_e2e.sh
# Run only Rust E2E tests
./tests/run_rust_e2e.sh
# Run only C# E2E tests
./tests/run_csharp_e2e.sh
# Run only Varnish E2E tests
./tests/run_varnish_e2e.shSee tests/KOTLIN_E2E_TESTS.md for detailed coverage and troubleshooting.
Using the MCP Server
The MCP server exposes three tools to any compatible AI client:
Tool 1: search_hybrid_context
Find code by meaning or keywords
Query: "How is user authentication implemented?"
Result: All auth-related code, signatures, docstrings, and dependenciesCapabilities:
Semantic search by functionality
Class/method/function name lookup
Docstring and inline comment search
Architectural pattern discovery
Full dependency context
Tool 2: find_callers
Find who calls a specific function
Query: "Find callers of getCurrentTimeInSeconds"
Result: All code that invokes this function + file locationsEach caller entry, target group header, and resolved target carries its repository as (repo: <name>), so results remain attributable under multi-repo scopes (repo_name: "all" or a comma list). The raw JSON (--output json) mirrors this with repo_name (referencing entity) and target_repo_name (referenced entity) fields on every row, plus repo_name on each resolution.targets[] entry.
Advanced: Search by Signature
# Find by full signature (Java)
echo '{"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"find_callers","arguments":{"entity_name":"registerUser(String"}}}' | knot-mcp
# Find by parameter type (Kotlin)
echo '{"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"find_callers","arguments":{"entity_name":"findById(Int"}}}' | knot-mcp
# Find by type annotation (TypeScript)
echo '{"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"find_callers","arguments":{"entity_name":"(EventData"}}}' | knot-mcp
# Find by C# interface method (surfaces implementations + call sites)
echo '{"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"find_callers","arguments":{"entity_name":"FindByIdAsync"}}}' | knot-mcpUse Cases:
Dead Code Detection: Zero callers = unused code
Impact Analysis: "What breaks if I modify this?"
Refactoring Safety: Find all references before removing
Override Discovery (JVM + C#): For Java/Kotlin/Groovy/C# methods, results include an Overridden by group (implementations/overrides in subtypes) and an Overrides group (the supertype methods a method implements/overrides). These are backed by real
OVERRIDESedges built at index time and resolved transitively at query time, so querying an interface/superclass method surfaces every implementation, and querying an implementation surfaces the declaration it overrides.
Tool 3: explore_file
Understand file structure
Query: "What's in BrowserService.ts?"
Result: All classes, methods, and functions with signatures and docsUse Cases:
Quick file navigation
Module structure overview
Finding all methods in a class without reading line-by-line
🔗 MCP Client Configuration
Supported Clients
knot works with any MCP-compatible AI client:
✅ Claude Desktop (Anthropic)
✅ Gemini CLI (Google)
✅ ChatGPT CLI / GPT (OpenAI)
✅ Cursor (AI IDE)
✅ Any standard MCP client
Configuration Examples
Claude Desktop
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"knot": {
"command": "/absolute/path/to/knot/target/release/knot-mcp",
"env": {
"KNOT_REPO_PATH": "/path/to/indexed/repo",
"KNOT_QDRANT_URL": "http://localhost:6334",
"KNOT_NEO4J_URI": "bolt://localhost:7687",
"KNOT_NEO4J_USER": "neo4j",
"KNOT_NEO4J_PASSWORD": "your-password"
}
}
}
}Gemini CLI
{
"mcpServers": {
"knot": {
"command": "/absolute/path/to/knot/target/release/knot-mcp",
"env": {
"KNOT_REPO_PATH": "/path/to/indexed/repo",
"KNOT_QDRANT_URL": "http://localhost:6334",
"KNOT_NEO4J_URI": "bolt://localhost:7687",
"KNOT_NEO4J_USER": "neo4j",
"KNOT_NEO4J_PASSWORD": "your-password"
}
}
}
}ChatGPT / GPT CLI
Similar JSON configuration in your client's MCP configuration file.
⚙️ Configuration Reference
All options can be set via CLI flags, environment variables, or a ~/.config/knot/.env file.
Priority (highest to lowest): CLI flags > environment variables > .env file.
Env Variable | CLI Flag | Default | Description |
|
| (required) | Root directory of the repository to index |
|
| (auto-detected) | Repository name for multi-repo isolation (auto-detected from last path component) |
|
|
| Qdrant server URL |
|
|
| Qdrant collection name |
|
|
| Neo4j Bolt URI |
|
|
| Neo4j username |
|
| (required) | Neo4j password |
|
|
| Embedding vector dimension |
|
|
| Entities per batch |
|
|
| Force full re-index (delete all existing data) |
|
| (none) | Path to CA certificate bundle for corporate SSL proxies |
|
|
| Include YAML/JSON/properties/K8s/Helm files in the index |
| (env only) |
| Log level: |
🎨 Custom Tree-sitter Queries
The built-in extraction queries (queries/java.scm, queries/typescript.scm, queries/csharp.scm) can be overridden without recompiling:
KNOT_CUSTOM_QUERIES_PATH=/path/to/my/queries ./target/release/knot-indexerPlace java.scm, typescript.scm, and/or csharp.scm in your custom directory. Missing files fall back to built-in defaults.
🔐 Corporate SSL / CA Certificates
In restricted corporate environments with SSL-inspecting proxies, you may need to provide a custom CA certificate bundle so that knot can download the embedding model from HuggingFace.
Via environment variable:
export KNOT_CUSTOM_CA_CERTS=/etc/ssl/certs/corporate-bundle.pem
./target/release/knot-indexer --repo-path /path/to/repo --neo4j-password secretVia CLI flag:
./target/release/knot-indexer \
--custom-ca-certs /etc/ssl/certs/corporate-bundle.pem \
--repo-path /path/to/repo \
--neo4j-password secretVia .env file:
echo "KNOT_CUSTOM_CA_CERTS=/etc/ssl/certs/corporate-bundle.pem" >> ~/.config/knot/.env
./target/release/knot-indexerThis works for all three binaries: knot-indexer, knot-mcp, and knot.
🔄 Workflow Example
Step 1: Index a Java project
./target/release/knot-indexer --repo-path /home/user/my-java-app --neo4j-password secretStep 2: Query via CLI (Instant search)
./target/release/knot search "authentication logic"
./target/release/knot callers "UserService.login"Step 3: Start MCP server (For AI Agents)
./target/release/knot-mcpStep 4: Use with Claude Desktop
Claude will list the three tools in its Tools menu
Ask: "Search for all authentication logic"
Ask: "Find who calls the login method"
Ask: "Explore the structure of UserService.java"
🤖 Auto-Configuring AI Agents
knot includes a universal .prompt file in its root directory that automatically configures modern AI coding agents (Cursor, Cline, opencode, Claude, etc.) to use the knot-mcp tools correctly.
The directive explicitly instructs AI agents to prioritize:
search_hybrid_context— for semantic code discovery (instead ofgrep)find_callers— for reverse dependency analysis (instead of finding references manually)explore_file— for file structure inspection (instead of reading line-by-line)
This ensures that when you ask an AI agent to analyze, refactor, or understand your code, it leverages the full power of the vector and graph databases rather than falling back to context-blind regex searches. The .prompt file is universal and tool-agnostic, working with any LLM client that reads codebase directives.
🤝 Contributing
Contributions are welcome! Please ensure:
All code passes
cargo clippyandcargo fmtNo new
unsafecode (unsafe_code = "deny"at crate level; one audited exception insrc/utils/mod.rsfor corporate proxy CA bundle injection, documented via#[expect(unsafe_code, reason = "…")])Changes are compatible with Rust 2024 edition
All new functionality includes unit tests
Performance regressions are validated with the benchmark framework before submitting PRs
Performance Benchmarking
The project includes a three-level benchmarking framework to validate optimizations and detect regressions:
Level 1 — Unit Benchmarks (Criterion):
cargo bench --bench pipeline_bench # Parse + prepare throughput per language
cargo bench --bench graph_upsert_bench # Neo4j UNWIND batching speedup (needs Neo4j)
cargo bench --bench channel_backpressure_bench # Bounded channel overheadLevel 2 — E2E Integration Benchmarks:
# Full pipeline metrics with memory and per-stage timing
./tests/benchmark_e2e.sh --focus rust_e2e --output-dir /tmp/perf_results
# Compare against baseline (fails CI if tolerance exceeded)
scripts/compare_perf_metrics.sh /tmp/perf_results .perf_metrics/baseline.jsonLevel 3 — Token Efficiency Benchmark:
# Measures knot tool output vs grep + file reads on indexed repositories
python3 scripts/token_savings_benchmark.py \
--config scripts/token_savings_tasks.json \
--save-json .perf_metrics/token_savings.jsonUnlike levels 1 and 2 (which measure indexing throughput), this one measures the
consumer side: how many LLM tokens an agent spends to answer a question with
knot versus by reading source files. Requires rg, a built knot binary, the
repositories in the config already indexed, and optionally tiktoken for exact
token counts. See Token Efficiency
for the published results.
Baseline files: .perf_metrics/baseline.json stores the last known good metrics (committed, updated on main/master merges). Tolerance thresholds in .perf_metrics/threshold_tolerances.json control regression gates (±5% time, ±10% memory by default).
CI Integration: The test-performance job in .github/workflows/ci.yml runs after all E2E correctness tests pass, comparing results against baseline and fails the build on regression.
📜 License
This project is licensed under the MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
🚀 Roadmap
For the full release history see CHANGELOG.md.
Upcoming
Long-Term Vision
Go support
IDE plugins (VS Code, IntelliJ, Vim)
Language Server Protocol (LSP) integration
Automated Code Review tool (MCP-based)
Ruby support
💬 Questions?
For issues, feature requests, or discussions, please open a GitHub issue.
Available Tools
5 toolsexplore_fileA
Read-only file anatomy inspection. Use this to list all classes, methods, and properties within a specific source file without reading its entire contents. Provides a structural bird's-eye view of a file, showing entity signatures and docstrings to quickly grasp a module's layout.
Usage: Use AFTER identifying an interesting file via 'search_hybrid_context' to understand its available methods, or before modifying a file. Do NOT use this for searching across multiple files.
Behaviour & Return: Read-only operation. Returns a Markdown-formatted outline of the file's entities, grouped by type (Classes, Methods, Interfaces), including line numbers for direct editor navigation. No side effects.
Path handling: file_path should be a repo-relative path (e.g. 'src/services/user.ts'). Absolute paths under your local checkout are also accepted; the tool strips the known local root automatically. The returned file_path is normalized to the same repo-relative form regardless of how it was queried. If the query is ambiguous across multiple repositories, the answer includes an 'ambiguous_path_candidates' list — retry with a longer path or pass repo_name.
Parameter guidance: 'file_path' must be a relative or absolute path to a valid source file. Include 'repo_name' if the file path might be ambiguous across multiple indexed repositories.
Supports Java, Kotlin, C#, and TypeScript codebases.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_path | Yes | Path to the source file to explore. PREFERRED: a repo-relative path (e.g. 'src/services/user.ts'). ALSO ACCEPTED: an absolute path under the repository's local checkout (the tool strips KNOT_REPO_PATH / CWD automatically). | |
| repo_name | No | Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository scope. Accepts a single repository name (`'my-repo'`), a comma-separated list (`'repo-a,repo-b'`), or `'all'` (or `'*'`) to query every indexed repository. If you know the repository you are working on, include it in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit to search across all repositories. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It explicitly states 'Read-only operation' and 'No side effects', describes the return format (Markdown outline with line numbers), and details path handling behaviors like normalization and ambiguous path candidates. This is thorough and transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with clear sections (Usage, Behaviour & Return, Path handling, Parameter guidance) and front-loads the core purpose. It is a bit long, but each paragraph adds necessary detail. It earns its place without redundancy, though it could be slightly more concise by trimming repetitive phrasing.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (2 params, no output schema), the description is complete. It covers usage order, return format, path handling edge cases, and even language support. An agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly and interpret the response without additional lookups.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds significant value beyond the schema. It explains the repo-relative vs absolute path handling, the stripping of local root, normalization of returned paths, and the 'ambiguous_path_candidates' scenario. It also clarifies when to pass repo_name, going well beyond the schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb (list/inspect) and resource (file anatomy), and distinguishes itself from siblings by explicitly saying 'Do NOT use this for searching across multiple files' and referencing search_hybrid_context. This makes its purpose unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit usage guidance: 'Use AFTER identifying an interesting file via search_hybrid_context' and 'before modifying a file', and clearly states when not to use it ('Do NOT use this for searching across multiple files'). It names the alternative tool, giving clear context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
find_callersA
Read-only reverse dependency lookup. Use this to find all code that references, calls, extends, or implements a specific entity. Answers 'who uses this code?' by querying the graph database. Differs from search tools by providing exact dependency tracking.
Usage: Use for impact analysis before refactoring or to detect dead code. Do NOT use this for semantic feature discovery—use 'search_hybrid_context' instead.
Matching is precedence-based: exact FQN (containing '.' or '::') → FQN suffix (Type.member) → exact name → signature prefix (accept(List) → fuzzy substring. The first tier that matches wins, so an exact name never returns fuzzy noise. Pass a qualified name (Namespace.Type.Member) to disambiguate homonyms. Responses state which tier matched and flag fuzzy results explicitly.
Behaviour & Return: Read-only graph traversal with no side effects. Returns Markdown grouped by relationship type (Calls, Extends, Implements, References, Overridden by, Overrides) with exact file paths and line numbers. Each caller entry and each resolved target states its repository as (repo: name), so rows are attributable when multiple repositories are in scope. For JVM code (Java/Kotlin/Groovy) and C#, 'Overridden by' lists method implementations/overrides in subtypes and 'Overrides' lists the supertype methods a method implements/overrides. When multiple entities with the same name exist (e.g., 'find_nearest_entity_by_line' in orphans.rs vs rust.rs), results are grouped by target entity showing which specific target each caller references. Each caller entry includes: name, kind, file_path:line_number, and signature. When multiple targets exist, each group shows the target's location and signature.
Parameter guidance: 'entity_name' supports exact names or signature fragments (e.g., 'handleRequest' or 'handle(Request'). Include 'repo_name' to filter results to the specific codebase being analyzed.
Supports Java, Kotlin, C#, Rust, and TypeScript codebases.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo_name | No | Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository scope. Accepts a single repository name (`'my-repo'`), a comma-separated list (`'repo-a,repo-b'`), or `'all'` (or `'*'`) to query every indexed repository. If you know the repository you are working on, include it in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit to search across all repositories. | |
| entity_name | Yes | The name of the function, method, or class to find callers for |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, and it delivers comprehensively. It states the operation is read-only with no side effects, describes the graph-database traversal, details matching precedence, explains fuzzy-result flagging, specifies return grouping by relationship type, and accounts for repository attribution and homonym handling. This is far beyond minimum transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is long but well-structured with clearly labeled sections: Usage, Matching, Behaviour & Return, and Parameter guidance. Each paragraph earns its place by covering a distinct aspect of the tool, and the core purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence. No filler or tautological content is present.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is unusually complete. It covers invocation semantics, return format, matching behavior, edge cases like multiple same-named entities, repository scoping, and supported languages. An agent has enough information to select, invoke, and interpret results correctly without additional hidden context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaningful semantics beyond the schema. It explains that entity_name supports exact names or signature fragments like 'handle(Request', clarifies precedence-based matching, and advises using qualified names to disambiguate homonyms. It also reinforces repo_name as a filtering mechanism for the target codebase.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Read-only reverse dependency lookup' that finds all code referencing, calling, extending, or implementing an entity. It explicitly contrasts itself from search tools by offering 'exact dependency tracking,' and the opening answers the tool's core question ('who uses this code?'). This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like search_hybrid_context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage guidance is explicit: 'Use for impact analysis before refactoring or to detect dead code.' It also gives a direct exclusion and alternative: 'Do NOT use this for semantic feature discovery—use search_hybrid_context instead.' This leaves no ambiguity about when to select this tool over its sibling.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_repo_dependenciesA
Read-only cross-repository dependency graph lookup. Shows which repositories depend on each other via build system declarations (Maven, Gradle, Cargo, npm, NuGet). Answers 'which repos does this repo depend on?' and 'which repos depend on this repo?'.
Usage: Use BEFORE cross-repo analysis to discover which other indexed repos are available for call tracing. Use reverse mode for impact analysis before making breaking changes in shared libraries.
Behaviour & Return: Read-only graph traversal with no side effects. Returns a JSON array of repository names. Empty results mean no DEPENDS_ON relationships exist for that repo.
Parameter guidance: 'repo_name' is required and must match the name used during indexing. 'max_depth' defaults to 3 (1 = direct only). 'reverse' toggles between forward and reverse dependency lookup.
Supports all build systems indexed by knot: Maven, Gradle, Cargo, npm, NuGet (.csproj + Central Package Management via Directory.Packages.props). C# repos that previously reported build_system: "none" now report "nuget" on re-index; knot-indexer --clean is recommended for immediate effect.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| reverse | No | If true, show repositories that depend ON this repo (reverse lookup). If false (default), show repositories this repo depends ON. Use reverse for impact analysis before breaking changes. | |
| max_depth | No | Maximum depth for transitive dependency traversal (default: 3). Use 1 for direct dependencies only. Higher values follow chains deeper. Must be between 1 and 10. | |
| repo_name | Yes | Repository name to show dependencies for. Must match the name used during indexing (e.g., 'my-java-repo', 'auth-service'). This is REQUIRED — there is no default. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It explicitly states 'Read-only graph traversal with no side effects,' describes the return format ('JSON array of repository names'), explains empty results ('Empty results mean no DEPENDS_ON relationships exist'), and even discloses the re-index behavior for C# repos. This is exemplary transparency for a tool with zero annotation support.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is structured with clear sections (purpose, usage, behavior, parameters, build system support) and is front-loaded with the core purpose. While it is longer than necessary, every sentence adds value—particularly the indexing caveat and the explicit behavior guarantees. It is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity, though it could be tightened slightly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers return type, empty-result semantics, parameter defaults, and even edge cases like re-indexing. It also mentions all supported build systems. Nothing an agent needs to invoke this tool correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds context like 'must match the name used during indexing' and repeats default values, but most of this is already present in the schema descriptions. It does not add substantial new meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so a 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('lookup'), resource ('cross-repository dependency graph'), and scope ('which repositories depend on each other via build system declarations'). It directly answers the two core questions, and the sibling tools (search_hybrid_context, find_callers, explore_file, list_repositories) are clearly distinct, so an agent can tell this apart without opening schemas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicit guidance is given: 'Use BEFORE cross-repo analysis to discover which other indexed repos are available for call tracing' and 'Use reverse mode for impact analysis before making breaking changes in shared libraries.' These are concrete, scenario-driven instructions that also implicitly differentiate from siblings like find_callers (which likely traces code calls rather than build dependencies).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_repositoriesA
Read-only listing of all indexed repositories with optional name filtering. Shows repository metadata including entity count, file count, build system, and primary language. Answers 'what codebases have I indexed?' and 'which repositories match this name?'.
Usage: Use this tool FIRST to discover available codebases before searching or exploring. Once you know the repository name, switch to 'search_hybrid_context' for semantic search, 'find_callers' for reverse dependency lookup, 'explore_file' for file anatomy, or 'list_repo_dependencies' for cross-repo dependency graphs. Do NOT use this tool to search for code entities — use 'search_hybrid_context' instead.
Behaviour & Return: Read-only query with no side effects. Returns a Markdown table with columns: REPO, BUILD SYSTEM, LANGUAGE, FILES, ENTITIES. When no repositories match the filter, returns 'No repositories found.'
Parameter guidance: 'filter' is optional. When provided, only repositories whose name contains the filter string are returned (case-insensitive substring match). Omit to list all indexed repositories.
Supports all languages and build systems indexed by knot.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filter | No | Optional filter to narrow down repositories by name (case-insensitive substring match). When provided, only repositories whose name contains this string are returned. Examples: 'auth' matches 'auth-service' and 'Auth-Lib', 'api' matches 'my-api'. Omit to list all indexed repositories. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Declares read-only, no side effects, describes return format (Markdown table), empty state behavior ('No repositories found.'), and mentions support for all languages and build systems.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Well-organized into sections with clear headings. Every sentence is informative, though somewhat verbose. Could be slightly tightened but remains effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given only one optional parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fully covers purpose, usage, behavior, parameter details, and return format, leaving no gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by clarifying case-insensitive substring match and providing examples of filter usage, elevating it above baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states a read-only listing of indexed repositories with optional name filtering. It distinguishes itself from siblings by specifying it is for discovering codebases, not for searching code entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly advises to use this tool FIRST, provides when-not-to-use (e.g., 'Do NOT use this tool to search for code entities'), and lists specific sibling alternatives for different tasks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_hybrid_contextA
Read-only semantic and structural code search combining vector embeddings with graph analysis. Use this for initial codebase discovery to find features by their meaning (e.g., 'user authentication'). Locates code based on natural language descriptions instead of exact keywords, returning relevant files, signatures, and documentation.
⚠️ PREREQUISITE: This tool requires an active knot-mcp server with vector database (Qdrant) and graph database (Neo4j) initialized.
Behavior & Return: Performs a read-only dual query against vector DB (for semantic similarity) and graph DB (for architectural relationships). Returns Markdown-formatted results with file paths, line numbers, code snippets, and cross-repository dependencies. No side effects.
Usage: Use as your FIRST step when exploring unfamiliar code or discovering architectural patterns. Do NOT use this to find all usages of a specific function—use the 'find_callers' tool for that instead.
Parameter guidance: 'query' should be 2-5 words describing functionality. Increase 'max_results' to 10-20 for broad discovery, keep at 5 for focused search. Include 'repo_name' in your first query to avoid cross-repository pollution.
Supports Java, Kotlin, C#, and TypeScript codebases.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | Search query describing what you're looking for (e.g., 'user authentication', 'API error handling') | |
| repo_name | No | Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository scope. Accepts a single repository name (`'my-repo'`), a comma-separated list (`'repo-a,repo-b'`), or `'all'` (or `'*'`) to query every indexed repository. If you know the repository you are working on, include it in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit to search across all repositories. | |
| max_results | No | Maximum number of results to return (default: 5) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description fully carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It discloses read-only nature ('No side effects'), prerequisites (active knot-mcp server with Qdrant and Neo4j), return format (Markdown with file paths, line numbers, code snippets, cross-repository dependencies), and supported languages. This is thorough and transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-organized with clear sections (⚠️ PREREQUISITE, Behavior & Return, Usage, Parameter guidance). Purpose is front-loaded, sibling differentiation is immediate, and every sentence adds value. The length is justified by the tool's complexity and the sections make it scannable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Covers all essential aspects: purpose, when to use, when not to use, parameters, return format, side effects, prerequisites, and supported languages. With no output schema, the description fully equips an agent to invoke the tool correctly and interpret results.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, setting a baseline of 3. The description adds practical guidance beyond the schema: query should be 2-5 words, max_results should be increased to 10-20 for broad discovery, and repo_name should be included in the first query to avoid cross-repository pollution. This enhances parameter understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it is a read-only semantic and structural code search combining vector embeddings with graph analysis, used for initial codebase discovery by meaning. It explicitly contrasts with the sibling find_callers, noting it should not be used for specific function usage searches, making differentiation unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides explicit guidance: 'Use as your FIRST step when exploring unfamiliar code or discovering architectural patterns' and 'Do NOT use this to find all usages of a specific function—use the find_callers tool for that instead.' Also includes parameter tuning advice (query length, max_results, repo_name) for different scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
3 tool updates
v1.8.1- Changed
explore_file1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo_name / descriptionPrevious value: -"Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository name to filter results to a specific codebase (e.g., 'my-java-repo'). If you know the repository you are working on, include this in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit only to search across all repositories."New value: +"Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository scope. Accepts a single repository name (`'my-repo'`), a comma-separated list (`'repo-a,repo-b'`), or `'all'` (or `'*'`) to query every indexed repository. If you know the repository you are working on, include it in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit to search across all repositories."
- Changed
find_callers1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo_name / descriptionPrevious value: -"Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository name to filter results to a specific codebase (e.g., 'my-java-repo'). If you know the repository you are working on, include this in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit only to search across all repositories."New value: +"Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository scope. Accepts a single repository name (`'my-repo'`), a comma-separated list (`'repo-a,repo-b'`), or `'all'` (or `'*'`) to query every indexed repository. If you know the repository you are working on, include it in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit to search across all repositories."
- Changed
search_hybrid_context1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / repo_name / descriptionPrevious value: -"Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository name to filter results to a specific codebase (e.g., 'my-java-repo'). If you know the repository you are working on, include this in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit only to search across all repositories."New value: +"Optional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository scope. Accepts a single repository name (`'my-repo'`), a comma-separated list (`'repo-a,repo-b'`), or `'all'` (or `'*'`) to query every indexed repository. If you know the repository you are working on, include it in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit to search across all repositories."
1 tool update
v1.5.1- Changed
explore_file1 field changed- changed
Input schema / properties / file_path / descriptionPrevious value: -"Absolute path to the source file to explore"New value: +"Path to the source file to explore. PREFERRED: a repo-relative path (e.g. 'src/services/user.ts'). ALSO ACCEPTED: an absolute path under the repository's local checkout (the tool strips KNOT_REPO_PATH / CWD automatically)."
1 tool update
v1.4.11- Added
list_repositories
4 tool updates
v1.4.0- Added
explore_file - Added
find_callers - Added
list_repo_dependencies - Added
search_hybrid_context
4 tool updates
v1.3.8- Removed
explore_file - Removed
find_callers - Removed
list_repo_dependencies - Removed
search_hybrid_context
4 tool updates
- Added
explore_file - Added
find_callers - Added
list_repo_dependencies - Added
search_hybrid_context
4 tool updates
v1.3.2- Removed
explore_file - Removed
find_callers - Removed
list_repo_dependencies - Removed
search_hybrid_context
4 tool updates
v1.2.8- Added
explore_file - Added
find_callers - Added
list_repo_dependencies - Added
search_hybrid_context
4 tool updates
v1.2.7- Removed
explore_file - Removed
find_callers - Removed
list_repo_dependencies - Removed
search_hybrid_context
1 tool update
v1.2.5- Added
list_repo_dependencies
TDQS
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of code exploration: file structure, caller tracking, cross-repo dependencies, and semantic search. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using underscores (explore_file, find_callers, list_repo_dependencies, search_hybrid_context). No mixing of styles.
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of code analysis and cross-repo dependency lookup. Each tool serves a critical and distinct function.
The tool set covers primary code exploration needs (file structure, callers, dependencies, semantic search). Minor gaps like exact keyword search or raw file content retrieval exist but are not critical given the hybrid search and other tools.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Code intelligence platform for AI agents. 20 tools for architecture, security & impact analysis.
Code intelligence for coding agents: semantic, AST, graph, and full-text search. 279+ languages.
Give your AI agent a persistent map of your project's structure, dependencies, and bugs.
Deterministic context layer for your codebase: change impact, blast radius, answers with receipts.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA complete MCP server for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with file management and vector memory for agents. Supports multiple document formats (PDF, DOCX, TXT, MD, CSV, JSON) with semantic search using Hugging Face embeddings and ChromaDB for efficient vector storage.11121MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceTurns Claude Desktop into a personal document question-answering system using local vector search. Index PDF, TXT, and Markdown documents into collections and get answers based strictly on your documents with zero hallucination.12-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA graph-powered code intelligence engine that indexes codebases into a structural knowledge graph to provide AI agents with deep context on function calls, types, and execution flows. It offers local, zero-dependency tools for hybrid search, impact analysis, and dead code detection across Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript projects.808MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA minimalist indexing tool that provides AI agents with semantic search and structural AST parsing for deep codebase understanding. It enables autonomous agents to navigate large codebases predictably using vector embeddings and native language server capabilities like definition and reference tracking.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/raultov/knot'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server