Skip to main content
Glama

MCP Ping

Pings a host and returns the result.

NOTE

This MCP server was made predominantly todemonstrate how to use FastMCP.

Usage

mcp-ping

Related MCP server: Ping MCP Server

Configuration

Server supports the following environment variables:

Name

Description

HTTP_PROXY

URL of HTTP proxy to use (optional)

MCP Server Profile

{
  "prompts": [],
  "resources": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "annotations": {
        "openWorldHint": false,
        "readOnlyHint": true,
        "title": "Ping"
      },
      "description": "Pings a host and returns the result",
      "inputSchema": {
        "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
        "additionalProperties": false,
        "properties": {
          "host": {
            "description": "The hostname or URL to ping (e.g., 'google.com' or 'https://google.com')",
            "type": "string"
          }
        },
        "required": ["host"],
        "type": "object"
      },
      "name": "ping"
    }
  ]
}

Tools

ping tool example response

Ping results for glama.ai:

PING glama.ai (37.16.29.120): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 37.16.29.120: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=11.273 ms
64 bytes from 37.16.29.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=11.353 ms
64 bytes from 37.16.29.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=11.455 ms
64 bytes from 37.16.29.120: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=12.634 ms

--- glama.ai ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 11.273/11.679/12.634/0.555 ms

Testing

npm run test

Available Tools

1 tool
pingA
Read-only

Pings a host and returns the result

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hostYesThe hostname or URL to ping (e.g., 'google.com' or 'https://google.com')

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, which the description does not contradict. However, the description adds no further behavioral insights (e.g., timeout, protocol used). The minimalism is acceptable given the simplicity and annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the action and result. Every word is necessary, and there is no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (1 param, no output schema, no siblings). The description covers the core purpose and input sufficiently. A minor improvement could mention the return format, but it remains complete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides a detailed description for the 'host' parameter (100% coverage). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Pings a host and returns the result' is a specific verb and resource combination that clearly states the tool's action and outcome. With no sibling tools, differentiation is unnecessary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While no explicit when-to-use or alternatives are provided, the description implicitly indicates it is a network diagnostic tool. For a simple tool with a single parameter and no siblings, this is adequate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • Addedping
  2. 1 tool update
    • Removedping
  3. 1 tool update
    • First observedping

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so no possibility for confusion. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

With a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The verb-style name matches the action.

Tool Count4/5

A single tool is minimal, but for a dedicated ping utility it is acceptable and not excessive. It borders on thin but works for its narrow purpose.

Completeness5/5

The tool covers the core functionality of pinging a host. Given the server's apparent single-purpose scope, there are no obvious missing operations.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessSyncing

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides a ping tool to check connectivity and measure latency to any hostname or IP address across platforms.
    18
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that allows users to ping other hosts to check network connectivity and diagnostic information. It enables LLMs to perform network latency tests and host availability checks through a standardized interface.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Minimal MCP server that enables network connectivity testing via ping commands from VS Code Chat. Features cross-platform support and secure execution using execFile with input validation to prevent command injection.
    1
    -

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/punkpeye/mcp-ping'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server