get_keyframe_public_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It indicates a retrieval operation with 'Get', but does not disclose whether the URL expires, whether authentication is required, what the URL points to beyond the keyframe image, or how errors are surfaced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence with no filler or redundant detail. It is appropriately sized for a simple two-parameter retrieval tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and the input schema fully documents its two required UUIDs. However, with no output schema and no annotations, the description leaves out important context such as whether the public URL is temporary, whether it can be shared broadly, and how it differs from proxy or download URL tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 100% of parameters with description for asset_id and keyframe_id. The description adds only the context that the keyframe is an image, but otherwise provides no parameter semantics beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Get') and a clear resource ('a public URL for a keyframe image'). It reads naturally and conveys the tool's function, though it does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling get_proxy_public_url, relying on the word 'keyframe' to carry that differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_proxy_public_url, get_proxy_download_url, or get_asset_keyframe. The usage context is only implied by the phrase 'public URL', with no exclusions or decision criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.