Asian Financial Filings MCP Server
Provides access to South Korea's DART (Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System) electronic disclosure repository, enabling retrieval of financial statements, company filings, XBRL data, shareholder information, executive details, and dividend information for 2,700+ Korean companies listed on KOSPI, KOSDAQ, and KONEX exchanges.
Enables search and retrieval of Samsung's financial filings, XBRL financial statements, major shareholder information, executive details, and dividend data through Korea's DART system.
Enables search and retrieval of Sony's financial filings, XBRL facts, and dimensional analysis through Japan's EDINET system.
Enables search and retrieval of Toyota's financial filings, XBRL facts, and dimensional analysis through Japan's EDINET system.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Asian Financial Filings MCP Servershow me Toyota's latest financial statements"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Unofficial Asian Financial Filings MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive access to Asian financial filings via Japan's EDINET and South Korea's DART systems. This server enables AI assistants and applications to search, retrieve, and analyze financial statements and XBRL data from 7,700+ Asian companies.
Key Features
Japan Coverage: Access 5,000+ companies via EDINET (Electronic Disclosure for Investors' NETwork)
Korea Coverage: Access 2,700+ companies via DART (Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System)
Complete Filing Access: Retrieve filing histories and document details
XBRL Parsing: Full iXBRL/XBRL-JSON parsing with J-GAAP and K-GAAP taxonomy support
Dimensional Analysis: Extract segment, geographic, and product breakdowns from financial data
Time-Series Analysis: Multi-period growth rates, trends, and mix analysis (Phase 2)
Fact Tables: Build BI-ready fact tables with value search and deviation analysis (Phase 2)
Comprehensive Data: Company info, financial statements, shareholders, executives, dividends
MCP Compatible: Works seamlessly with Cursor, Claude Desktop, and other MCP clients
Free APIs: Both EDINET and DART provide free access (API keys required)
Related MCP server: OpenDart-MCP
What are EDINET and DART?
EDINET (Japan)
The Electronic Disclosure for Investors' NETwork is Japan's mandatory electronic reporting system operated by the Financial Services Agency (FSA). Since 2008, all listed companies and major fund-raising entities must file their disclosure documents using EDINET in XBRL format with J-GAAP (Japanese GAAP) taxonomy.
Data Source: EDINET - Free public access with API key registration
DART (South Korea)
The Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System is Korea's electronic disclosure repository operated by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS). Companies on KOSPI, KOSDAQ, and KONEX exchanges file their reports through DART using K-GAAP/IFRS standards.
Data Source: Open DART - Free public API with key registration
Installation & Setup
Prerequisites
You'll need API keys from both services (free registration):
EDINET API Key:
Sign up with email
Complete multi-factor authentication
Receive your Subscription-Key
DART API Key:
Register for free API access
Receive your API key
Rate limit: 1,000 requests/minute
Usage
{
"mcpServers": {
"asia-filings": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/asia-filings-mcp-server/build/index.js"],
"env": {
"EDINET_API_KEY": "your-edinet-api-key-here",
"DART_API_KEY": "your-dart-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}Complete API Reference
The server provides a unified asia-filings tool with 19 powerful methods (including Phase 2 advanced analytics):
Japan EDINET Methods
1. Search Companies (search_japan_companies)
Find Japanese companies by name (Japanese or English).
{
"method": "search_japan_companies",
"query": "Toyota",
"limit": 10
}Returns: List of matching companies with EDINET codes and recent filing info.
2. Get Company by EDINET Code (get_japan_company_by_code)
Look up a specific company using its EDINET code.
{
"method": "get_japan_company_by_code",
"edinet_code": "E01225"
}Returns: Company details including name, codes, and latest filing.
3. Get Company Filings (get_japan_company_filings)
Retrieve filing history for a Japanese company.
{
"method": "get_japan_company_filings",
"edinet_code": "E01225",
"start_date": "2023-01-01",
"end_date": "2024-12-31",
"limit": 100
}Returns: Array of filings with URLs for documents and viewer.
4. Get Filing Document (get_japan_filing_document)
Download a specific filing document.
{
"method": "get_japan_filing_document",
"document_id": "S100XXXX",
"document_type": "4"
}Document Types: 1=submission, 2=PDF, 3=attachments, 4=XBRL
5. Get Documents by Date (get_japan_documents_by_date)
Get all filings submitted on a specific date.
{
"method": "get_japan_documents_by_date",
"date": "2024-12-01"
}6. Get Filing Facts - XBRL Parser (get_japan_filing_facts)
Extract and parse XBRL facts from a Japanese filing document. Parses inline XBRL (iXBRL) with J-GAAP taxonomy.
{
"method": "get_japan_filing_facts",
"document_id": "S100XXXX"
}Returns: Parsed XBRL facts including:
Numeric facts with values, units, and decimals
Context information (periods, entities)
Dimensional data (segments, geography)
Summary statistics by fact type
Taxonomy classification
7. Get Dimensional Facts (get_japan_dimensional_facts)
Extract dimensional breakdowns from Japanese XBRL filings (e.g., revenue by segment, geography, or product line).
{
"method": "get_japan_dimensional_facts",
"document_id": "S100XXXX",
"search_criteria": {
"concept": "revenue",
"hasDimensions": true
}
}Returns: Filtered facts with dimensional analysis including geographic, segment, and product breakdowns.
Korea DART Methods
8. Search Companies (search_korea_companies)
Find Korean companies by name.
{
"method": "search_korea_companies",
"query": "Samsung",
"limit": 10
}Returns: List of matching companies with corporate codes and recent filings.
9. Get Company by Corporate Code (get_korea_company_by_code)
Look up a specific company using its corporate code.
{
"method": "get_korea_company_by_code",
"corp_code": "00126380"
}Returns: Comprehensive company profile including CEO, address, and business details.
10. Get Company Filings (get_korea_company_filings)
Retrieve filing history for a Korean company.
{
"method": "get_korea_company_filings",
"corp_code": "00126380",
"start_date": "2023-01-01",
"end_date": "2024-12-31",
"report_type": "A",
"limit": 100
}Report Types: A=Annual, Q=Quarterly
11. Get Financial Statements - XBRL Parser (get_korea_financial_statements)
Extract and parse XBRL financial data for a specific period. Parses K-GAAP/IFRS taxonomy data.
{
"method": "get_korea_financial_statements",
"corp_code": "00126380",
"business_year": "2023",
"report_code": "11011"
}Report Codes: 11011=Annual, 11013=Q1, 11012=Q2, 11014=Q3
Returns: Parsed XBRL financial facts including:
Account names and IDs with K-GAAP concepts
Current term, previous term, and before-previous term values
Summary statistics by account type
Taxonomy classification (Assets, Liabilities, Equity, Revenue, Expenses)
12. Get Dimensional Facts (get_korea_dimensional_facts)
Extract dimensional breakdowns from Korean XBRL financial statements (e.g., revenue by business segment or geography).
{
"method": "get_korea_dimensional_facts",
"corp_code": "00126380",
"business_year": "2023",
"report_code": "11011",
"search_criteria": {
"concept": "매출",
"hasValue": true
}
}Returns: Filtered financial facts with dimensional analysis by geography, segments, and products.
13. Get Major Shareholders (get_korea_major_shareholders)
Retrieve major shareholder information.
{
"method": "get_korea_major_shareholders",
"corp_code": "00126380"
}Returns: Shareholder names, ownership percentages, and change reasons.
14. Get Executive Info (get_korea_executive_info)
Get information about company executives and officers.
{
"method": "get_korea_executive_info",
"corp_code": "00126380"
}Returns: Executive names, positions, birth years, and careers.
15. Get Dividend Info (get_korea_dividend_info)
Retrieve dividend allocation information.
{
"method": "get_korea_dividend_info",
"corp_code": "00126380",
"business_year": "2023"
}Returns: Dividend allocation details for the specified business year.
Utility Methods
16. Filter Filings (filter_filings)
Filter filing arrays by date, report type, and other criteria.
{
"method": "filter_filings",
"filings": [...],
"filters": {
"startDate": "2024-01-01",
"endDate": "2024-12-31",
"reportType": "Annual"
}
}Returns: Filtered filing array with counts.
Advanced Analysis Methods (Phase 2)
17. Build Fact Table (build_fact_table)
Build comprehensive fact table around a target value with business intelligence summaries. Searches for XBRL facts within a tolerance range and provides dimensional breakdowns.
{
"method": "build_fact_table",
"country": "JP",
"company_id": "E01225",
"target_value": 1000000000000,
"tolerance": 50000000000,
"document_id": "S100XXXX",
"options": {
"maxRows": 25,
"showDimensions": true,
"sortBy": "deviation"
}
}Parameters:
country: "JP" (Japan) or "KR" (Korea)company_id: EDINET code (JP) or corporate code (KR)target_value: Target value to search around (in Yen or Won)tolerance: Search range tolerance (±)document_id: Optional document ID (JP) or "businessYear:reportCode" format (KR)options: Table configuration (maxRows, sortBy, filters)
Returns: Comprehensive fact table with:
Facts within value range sorted by deviation from target
Business intelligence summaries
Geographic and segment breakdowns
Deviation analysis and exact matches
Value statistics and business classifications
18. Search Facts by Value (search_facts_by_value)
Alias for build_fact_table - search for XBRL facts within a value range. Same parameters and functionality as build_fact_table.
19. Time Series Analysis (time_series_analysis)
Analyze financial metrics across multiple periods with period-over-period growth rates, geographic/segment mix changes, and trend detection.
{
"method": "time_series_analysis",
"country": "KR",
"company_id": "00126380",
"options": {
"concept": "Revenue",
"periods": 4,
"includeGeography": true,
"includeSegments": true,
"showGrowthRates": true
}
}Parameters:
country: "JP" (Japan) or "KR" (Korea)company_id: EDINET code (JP) or corporate code (KR)options: Analysis configurationconcept: Financial concept to track (e.g., "Revenue", "Assets", "NetIncome")periods: Number of periods to analyze (default: 4)includeGeography: Include geographic breakdownsincludeSegments: Include segment breakdownsshowGrowthRates: Calculate period-over-period growth rates
Returns: Time-series analysis with:
Multi-period data table with facts across time
Period-over-period growth rates by geography/segment
Geographic mix analysis (composition changes over time)
Segment mix analysis (business segment evolution)
Trend detection (increasing, decreasing, stable)
Growth rate summaries and averages
Coverage
Japan (EDINET)
Companies: ~5,000 listed companies + 3,000 investment funds
Exchange: Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE)
Market Divisions: Prime, Standard, Growth
Taxonomy: J-GAAP (Japanese GAAP)
Document Types: 65 types including annual reports, quarterly reports, securities reports
Historical Data: From 2008+ (XBRL mandate start)
South Korea (DART)
Companies: ~2,700 listed companies
Exchanges:
KOSPI: ~880 companies
KOSDAQ: ~1,700 companies
KONEX: ~129 companies
Taxonomy: K-GAAP / IFRS
Disclosure Types: Annual, quarterly, major issues, equity, issuance, miscellaneous
Additional Data: Shareholder info, executive details, dividends
Real-World Use Cases
Investment Research
{
"method": "search_japan_companies",
"query": "Sony",
"limit": 5
}Find Japanese technology companies and analyze their financial statements
Cross-Market Analysis
{
"method": "search_korea_companies",
"query": "삼성전자",
"limit": 10
}Compare Korean electronics companies' financial performance
Financial Data Extraction
{
"method": "get_korea_financial_statements",
"corp_code": "00126380",
"business_year": "2023",
"report_code": "11011"
}Extract structured XBRL financial data for analysis
Shareholder Analysis
{
"method": "get_korea_major_shareholders",
"corp_code": "00126380"
}Track major shareholder positions and ownership changes
XBRL Parsing and Analysis
{
"method": "get_japan_filing_facts",
"document_id": "S100XXXX"
}Parse inline XBRL from Japanese filings to extract structured financial data
{
"method": "get_korea_dimensional_facts",
"corp_code": "00126380",
"business_year": "2023",
"report_code": "11011",
"search_criteria": {
"concept": "revenue",
"hasDimensions": true
}
}Extract dimensional breakdowns showing revenue by business segment or geography
XBRL Parser Capabilities
The server includes comprehensive XBRL parsing for both Japanese and Korean filings:
Japan (EDINET) - iXBRL Parser
Format: Inline XBRL (iXBRL) embedded in HTML
Taxonomy: J-GAAP (Japanese GAAP)
Parsing: Extracts facts from
ix:nonFractionandix:nonNumerictagsContexts: Full period, entity, and dimensional context extraction
Scale Handling: Automatic scale factor application (millions, billions)
Number Formats: Japanese negative number symbols (△, ▲, -)
Korea (DART) - XBRL-JSON Parser
Format: XBRL data in JSON format from API
Taxonomy: K-GAAP / IFRS
Parsing: Account names, IDs, and multi-period values
Periods: Current term, previous term, before-previous term
Korean Support: Native Korean account names (매출, 자산, 부채, 자본, etc.)
Common Features
Fact Classification: Automatic categorization (Assets, Liabilities, Equity, Revenue, Expenses, Cash Flow)
Dimensional Extraction: Geography, business segments, product lines
Value Filtering: Search by concept, value range, period, dimensions
Summary Statistics: Aggregated data by type, namespace, and dimension
UTF-8 Support: Full Japanese (漢字, ひらがな, カタカナ) and Korean (한글) character support
Taxonomy Reference
Japan - J-GAAP (Japanese GAAP)
Japanese companies follow J-GAAP taxonomy which differs from US-GAAP and IFRS. The EDINET taxonomy is designed to comply with Global Filing Manual (GFM) rules.
Future Development: Japan plans to adopt the ISSB taxonomy with Japan-specific extensions by 2027.
Korea - K-GAAP / IFRS
Korean companies use either K-GAAP (Korean GAAP) or IFRS depending on their size and listing status. Financial statements are available in XBRL format through the DART API.
Architecture
asia-filings-mcp-server/
├── src/
│ ├── index.js # MCP server implementation
│ ├── edinet-api.js # Japan EDINET API client
│ ├── dart-api.js # Korea DART API client
│ ├── xbrl-parser.js # XBRL/iXBRL parser (J-GAAP, K-GAAP)
│ ├── fact-table-builder.js # Fact table generation & BI summaries
│ └── time-series-analyzer.js # Multi-period growth & trend analysis
├── package.json
└── README.mdComparison with SEC/EU Servers
Feature | SEC EDGAR | EU Filings (ESEF) | Asia Filings |
Coverage | US companies | 27+ EU countries | Japan + South Korea |
Companies | 10,000+ | 23,000+ | 7,700+ |
Format | iXBRL | iXBRL | XBRL/iXBRL |
Taxonomy | US-GAAP | IFRS | J-GAAP, K-GAAP/IFRS |
Company ID | CIK | LEI | EDINET Code, Corp Code |
Data Source | data.sec.gov | filings.xbrl.org | EDINET, DART |
API Cost | Free | Free | Free (keys required) |
Authentication | User-Agent | None | API Keys |
Available Tools
1 toolasia-filingsC
Unified tool for Asian financial filings: access company filings, financial statements, and XBRL data from Japan (EDINET) and South Korea (DART). Provides comprehensive access to financial reports from 7,700+ Asian companies.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| method | Yes | The operation to perform: JAPAN (EDINET): - search_japan_companies: Search Japanese companies by name - get_japan_company_by_code: Get company by EDINET code - get_japan_company_filings: Get filing history for Japanese company - get_japan_filing_document: Download specific filing document - get_japan_documents_by_date: Get all filings for a specific date - get_japan_filing_facts: Extract XBRL facts from filing (J-GAAP) - get_japan_dimensional_facts: Get dimensional facts with breakdowns KOREA (DART): - search_korea_companies: Search Korean companies by name - get_korea_company_by_code: Get company by corporate code - get_korea_company_filings: Get filing history for Korean company - get_korea_financial_statements: Get financial statements (XBRL) - get_korea_major_shareholders: Get major shareholder information - get_korea_executive_info: Get executive/officer information - get_korea_dividend_info: Get dividend allocation information - get_korea_dimensional_facts: Get dimensional facts with breakdowns ADVANCED ANALYSIS (Phase 2): - build_fact_table: Build comprehensive fact table around target value with BI summaries - search_facts_by_value: Search for facts within value range (alias for build_fact_table) - time_series_analysis: Analyze financial metrics across multiple periods with growth rates UTILITIES: - filter_filings: Filter filing arrays by criteria | |
| query | No | For search methods: Company name to search (Japanese, Korean, or English) | |
| edinet_code | No | For Japan methods: EDINET code (E-number) | |
| corp_code | No | For Korea methods: Corporate code | |
| document_id | No | For get_japan_filing_document: Document ID from EDINET | |
| document_type | No | For get_japan_filing_document: Document type (1: submission, 2: PDF, 3: attachments, 4: XBRL) | |
| date | No | For get_japan_documents_by_date: Date in YYYY-MM-DD format | |
| start_date | No | For filing methods: Start date in YYYY-MM-DD format | |
| end_date | No | For filing methods: End date in YYYY-MM-DD format | |
| business_year | No | For get_korea_financial_statements, get_korea_dividend_info: Business year (YYYY) | |
| report_code | No | For get_korea_financial_statements: Report code (11011: Annual, 11013: Q1, 11012: Q2, 11014: Q3) | |
| report_type | No | For get_korea_company_filings: Report type filter | |
| limit | No | Maximum number of results to return | |
| filings | No | For filter_filings: Array of filing objects to filter | |
| filters | No | For filter_filings: Filter criteria (startDate, endDate, reportType) | |
| search_criteria | No | For dimensional_facts methods: Search criteria (concept, valueRange, period, hasDimensions) | |
| country | No | For advanced analysis methods: Country code (JP for Japan, KR for Korea) | |
| company_id | No | For advanced analysis methods: EDINET code (JP) or corp code (KR) | |
| target_value | No | For build_fact_table/search_facts_by_value: Target value to search around | |
| tolerance | No | For build_fact_table/search_facts_by_value: Tolerance range (±) | |
| options | No | For advanced analysis methods: Analysis options (maxRows, showDimensions, sortBy, concept, periods, includeGeography, includeSegments, showGrowthRates) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool 'provides comprehensive access' but fails to describe critical behaviors such as rate limits, authentication requirements, error handling, pagination, or data freshness. For a complex tool with 21 parameters and no annotations, this is a significant gap in transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded, with two sentences that efficiently convey the core purpose and scope. Every sentence earns its place by specifying the tool's function, geographic coverage, and data scale. It avoids redundancy and is well-structured for quick comprehension.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's high complexity (21 parameters, no annotations, no output schema), the description is insufficiently complete. It lacks details on behavioral traits, output formats, error conditions, and usage scenarios. While the schema covers parameters, the description fails to provide the necessary context for an agent to use the tool effectively in practice.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what is in the schema (e.g., it doesn't explain parameter interactions or provide examples not in the schema). According to the rules, with high schema coverage, the baseline is 3, and the description doesn't compensate with extra value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'access company filings, financial statements, and XBRL data from Japan (EDINET) and South Korea (DART)' with a specific scope of '7,700+ Asian companies.' It uses specific verbs like 'access' and 'provides' and identifies the resource as Asian financial filings. However, since there are no sibling tools mentioned, the differentiation aspect is not applicable, preventing a perfect score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. It mentions 'Unified tool' and 'comprehensive access,' but this is too vague to help an agent decide applicability. Without explicit usage context or named alternatives, the agent lacks operational direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
asia-filings
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as accessing financial filings from Asian markets, leaving no room for misselection.
Since there is only a single tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'asia-filings' follows a clear and descriptive pattern, and there are no other tools to cause inconsistency.
A single tool for accessing financial filings from multiple countries and thousands of companies feels thin and under-scoped. This likely forces too much functionality into one tool, making it less intuitive for agents to use specific operations like retrieving filings by country, year, or company type.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for the domain of Asian financial filings. While the tool provides access, there are obvious gaps such as no separate tools for filtering, searching, downloading specific report types, or handling metadata, which are essential for comprehensive financial analysis workflows.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Cross-market (US/JP/KR) structured financials, segments, ownership & metrics, traceable to filings.
Search company disclosures and financial statements from the Korean market. Retrieve stock profile…
Remote MCP for Japan's EDINET DB — 3,800 listed companies' financials & filings (OAuth)
Official-source financial data for AI agents: Korea, US, Taiwan, Japan, Europe. 37 tools, free tier.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive access to SEC EDGAR filings, allowing users to search companies, retrieve financial statements, and analyze dimensional XBRL data including revenue breakdowns by geography, business segments, and product lines.13MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to South Korea's DART (Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System) financial disclosure system, enabling users to retrieve corporate information, financial statements, debt summaries, subsidiary investments, employee data, and stock information for Korean companies.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides programmatic access to Japan's EDINET system to search for listed companies and retrieve annual or quarterly financial reports. It parses XBRL filings into structured data, enabling AI assistants to analyze balance sheets, income statements, and cash flows.18Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides natural language access to South Korean corporate disclosure data, financial statements, and shareholder information through the DART Open API. It enables users to query 83 different tools for real-time reporting and regulatory filings from Korean listed companies.833MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/openpharma-org/asia-filings-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server