Skip to main content
Glama
openl-tablets

OpenL MCP Server

Official

Create or Copy Project

openl_create_project

Create a new OpenL project in a design repository and commit it. Omit template for a blank skeleton, or pass an existing project's ID to clone its full structure.

Instructions

Create a new OpenL project in a design repository and commit it. Two modes, selected by the template argument: • CREATE (omit template): create a BLANK project from the default empty skeleton. • COPY (pass template = an existing project's exact projectId from openl_list_projects): use Studio's server-side project-copy API to copy that source project's FULL structure and rename its descriptor to projectName. Do not pass the displayed project name because mapped repositories may contain multiple projects with the same name. Both modes are committed and indexed atomically. Omit branch for the repository's configured/default branch, or pass a target branch from openl_list_branches(); Studio also supports creating a missing branch from the base branch. Returns the new project name, commit revision, and Studio's opaque projectId. A name collision, missing copy source, or missing permission is rejected with an actionable error. Local repositories are not supported.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
branchNoTarget branch for either BLANK creation or CLONING. Omit for the repository's configured/default branch. Studio selects an existing branch case-insensitively; when the branch does not exist, Studio may create it from the repository base branch. Use openl_list_branches() first to avoid accidental branch creation.
commentNoCommit comment for audit. Applied to both BLANK creation and CLONING; Studio supplies its configured create/copy comment when omitted.
templateNoHow to create the project (the ticket's `template`). OMIT to create a BLANK project from the default empty skeleton. To CLONE an existing project, pass its exact opaque projectId from openl_list_projects() without modification: its full structure is copied (rules, tests, settings, request/response examples) and the project is renamed to projectName. Never pass the displayed project name because mapped repositories may contain multiple projects with the same name.
repositoryYesRepository identifier. Pass either the 'id' or the 'name' field from openl_list_repositories() — the tool accepts both (and is case-insensitive). DO NOT invent values like 'Design Repository' or 'design-repo'; the actual names are typically short tokens (e.g. 'Design'). Always call openl_list_repositories() first if you don't already have the value in context.
projectNameYesName for the new project (the ticket's `project`). Becomes the project folder name and — when cloning — the renamed project name written into rules.xml. Must be unique in the repository; a collision is rejected with 409. Allowed characters: letters, digits, space, '_' and '-'.
response_formatNoResponse format: 'json' for structured, round-trippable data (default), 'markdown' for human-readable output, 'markdown_concise' for a brief summary (1-2 paragraphs), or 'markdown_detailed' for full details with contextjson

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed6 schema fields changedv1.2.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / branch / description
      Previous value: -"Target branch (the ticket's `defaultBranch`). Honored when CLONING (the source is read from and the clone written to this branch). For a BLANK project, omit this — blank projects are created on the repository's default branch (the create endpoint cannot target a branch); passing branch without template is rejected."New value: +"Target branch for either BLANK creation or CLONING. Omit for the repository's configured/default branch. Studio selects an existing branch case-insensitively; when the branch does not exist, Studio may create it from the repository base branch. Use openl_list_branches() first to avoid accidental branch creation."
    • changedInput schema / properties / comment / description
      Previous value: -"Commit comment for audit. Applied when creating a BLANK project; clone commit messages are system-generated. Defaults to 'Project <name> is created.' when omitted."New value: +"Commit comment for audit. Applied to both BLANK creation and CLONING; Studio supplies its configured create/copy comment when omitted."
    • changedInput schema / properties / response_format / default
      Previous value: -"markdown"New value: +"json"
    • changedInput schema / properties / response_format / description
      Previous value: -"Response format: 'json' for structured data, 'markdown' for human-readable (default), 'markdown_concise' for brief summary (1-2 paragraphs), 'markdown_detailed' for full details with context"New value: +"Response format: 'json' for structured, round-trippable data (default), 'markdown' for human-readable output, 'markdown_concise' for a brief summary (1-2 paragraphs), or 'markdown_detailed' for full details with context"
    • changedInput schema / properties / template / description
      Previous value: -"How to create the project (the ticket's `template`). OMIT to create a BLANK project from the default empty skeleton. To CLONE an existing project, pass its name (from openl_list_projects()): its full structure is copied (rules, tests, settings, request/response examples) and the project is renamed to projectName. The clone source must be in the same repository."New value: +"How to create the project (the ticket's `template`). OMIT to create a BLANK project from the default empty skeleton. To CLONE an existing project, pass its exact opaque projectId from openl_list_projects() without modification: its full structure is copied (rules, tests, settings, request/response examples) and the project is renamed to projectName. Never pass the displayed project name because mapped repositories may contain multiple projects with the same name."
    • addedInput schema / properties / template / minLength
      Added value: +1
  2. Addedv1.1.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, it discloses atomic commit/indexing, server-side full-structure copying, descriptor renaming, default-vs-target branch behavior, return values, and failure modes (collision, missing source, missing permission). There is no contradiction with the annotations, and the side effects are clearly described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but well structured: objective first, then modes, branch default, return values, and errors. Every sentence carries useful decision-relevant information with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-mode, six-parameter mutating tool with no output schema, it states what is returned, how the caller should obtain prerequisite IDs, how errors surface, and what is unsupported. An agent has enough to invoke it correctly and recover from likely failures.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all six parameters in detail (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The prose adds cross-parameter meaning by tying the template choice to the two modes and clarifying that branch/projectName semantics apply consistently to both creation and copy.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action (create/copy) on a specific resource (OpenL project) and separates the two modes by the template argument. It clearly distinguishes this from branch-creation, save, and deploy siblings by focusing on project creation with commit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives concrete invocation rules: omit template for blank creation, pass an exact opaque projectId from openl_list_projects for copying, omit branch for default, and pre-call openl_list_branches to avoid accidental branch creation. It names an exclusion (local repositories are not supported), though it does not explicitly contrast itself with close alternatives like openl_create_project_branch.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/openl-tablets/openl-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server