Replicate Designer MCP
Provides tools for generating images through Replicate's Flux 1.1 Pro model, allowing for customization of aspect ratios, output formats, and safety settings.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Replicate Designer MCPcreate a 16:9 image of a futuristic library with bioluminescent plants"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Replicate Designer MCP
An MCP server for generating images using Replicate's Flux 1.1 Pro model.
Installation
Using Directly from GitHub
You can use the MCP server directly from GitHub in several ways:
Option 1: Install directly with pip
pip install git+https://github.com/yourusername/replicate-designer.gitThen run it with:
mcp-replicate-designerOption 2: Use npx with GitHub repository
Create a configuration file (e.g., mcps.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"replicateDesigner": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"github:yourusername/replicate-designer"
],
"env": {
"REPLICATE_API_TOKEN": "your_replicate_api_token_here"
}
}
}
}Then use it with Claude or another assistant:
npx @anthropic-ai/assistant --mcps-json mcps.jsonThis method allows you to include your Replicate API token directly in the configuration file, which is more convenient than setting environment variables separately.
Option 3: Local Installation
Clone the repository and install from the local directory:
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/replicate-designer.git
cd replicate-designer
pip install -e .Publishing and Using via npm
To make your MCP available via npm (for easier distribution):
Package and publish your MCP:
# Build a wheel
pip install build
python -m build
# Publish to npm (after setting up an npm account)
npm init
npm publishThen users can install and use it directly:
npx -y mcp-replicate-designerRelated MCP server: BFL MCP Server
Usage
Setting the API Token
There are several ways to provide your Replicate API token:
Environment variable (for command line usage):
export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=your_api_token_hereIn the MCP configuration file (as shown in Option 2 above):
{ "mcpServers": { "replicateDesigner": { "command": "...", "args": ["..."], "env": { "REPLICATE_API_TOKEN": "your_replicate_api_token_here" } } } }Using a .env file in your project directory:
REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=your_api_token_hereThen, install the python-dotenv package:
pip install python-dotenv
Security Note: Be careful with your API tokens. Never commit them to public repositories, and use environment variables or secure secret management when possible.
Running the MCP server
mcp-replicate-designerBy default, it runs in stdio mode which is compatible with npx use. You can also run it in SSE mode:
mcp-replicate-designer --transport sse --port 8000Using with npx
This MCP can be used with an AI agent using npx in two ways:
Direct command line
npx @anthropic-ai/assistant --mcp mcp-replicate-designerAs a configuration object
In your configuration JSON:
{
"mcpServers": {
"replicateDesigner": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"mcp-replicate-designer"
]
}
}
}Then use it with:
npx @anthropic-ai/assistant --mcps-json /path/to/your/config.jsonTool
This MCP exposes a single tool:
generate_image
Generates an image using Replicate's Flux 1.1 Pro model.
Parameters:
prompt(string, required): Text description of the image to generateaspect_ratio(string, optional, default: "1:1"): Aspect ratio for the generated imageoutput_format(string, optional, default: "webp"): Format of the output imageoutput_quality(integer, optional, default: 80): Quality of the output image (1-100)safety_tolerance(integer, optional, default: 2): Safety tolerance level (0-3)prompt_upsampling(boolean, optional, default: true): Whether to use prompt upsampling
Example:
{
"prompt": "A photograph of an humanoid AI agent looking sad and in disrepair, the agent is sat at a workbench getting fixed by a human male",
"aspect_ratio": "1:1",
"output_format": "webp"
}Available Tools
1 toolgenerate_imageC
Generates an image using Replicate's Flux 1.1 Pro model
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | Text description of the image to generate | |
| aspect_ratio | No | Aspect ratio for the generated image (e.g. '1:1', '16:9', '4:3') | 1:1 |
| output_format | No | Format of the output image (e.g. 'webp', 'png', 'jpeg') | webp |
| output_quality | No | Quality of the output image (1-100) | |
| safety_tolerance | No | Safety tolerance level (0-3) | |
| prompt_upsampling | No | Whether to use prompt upsampling |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the model used ('Replicate's Flux 1.1 Pro model') but doesn't describe key behavioral traits such as cost implications, rate limits, authentication requirements, processing time, or what happens on failure. For a generative AI tool with potential side effects, this is a significant gap in transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that communicates the core functionality without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy to parse quickly. Every word earns its place in conveying the essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of an image generation tool with 6 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't explain what the tool returns (e.g., image URL, binary data, metadata), error conditions, or practical considerations like cost or latency. The description alone leaves significant gaps for an agent to use this tool effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, meaning all parameters are well-documented in the schema itself. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's in the schema. According to the rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline score is 3 even with no param info in the description, which applies here.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Generates an image') and specifies the resource/technology ('using Replicate's Flux 1.1 Pro model'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it lacks differentiation from siblings, but since there are no sibling tools, this doesn't reduce the score. The description is specific but could be more detailed about what type of image generation this provides.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or constraints. It simply states what the tool does without context about appropriate scenarios or limitations. Since there are no sibling tools, the lack of differentiation isn't penalized, but the complete absence of usage context warrants a low score.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
generate_image
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool 'generate_image' has a clearly distinct and singular purpose.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'generate_image' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'Replicate Designer MCP', which suggests a broader scope related to design or image generation. This minimal set feels thin and incomplete for the implied domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a design-oriented server. It only offers image generation, with no tools for editing, transforming, analyzing, or managing images, creating significant gaps that will limit agent functionality.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Flux AI image generation
Official FLUX MCP server. Generate, edit, vary, and browse images from Black Forest Labs.
MCP server for Qwen Image 3 AI image generation
MCP server for NanoBanana AI image generation and editing
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that generates images based on text prompts using Black Forest Lab's FLUX model, allowing for customized image dimensions, prompt upsampling, safety settings, and batch generation.31-
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables generating and editing high-quality images with natural language using Black Forest Labs' FLUX.1 Kontext Pro model.25-
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI image generation capabilities using OpenAI and Replicate APIs with support for customizable prompts and dimensions. It features specialized tools for generating square, landscape, and portrait images through simple natural language commands.543MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides AI image generation and editing capabilities using Google's Gemini 2.5 Flash Image API. It allows users to create new images from text, modify existing files, and perform iterative edits through natural language prompts.6758MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/noeltg77/Replicate-Designer'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server