Juno Create Project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide no destructive hint, and description adds key behavior: non-interactive (avoids create-juno CLI) and uses Vite. This goes beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words; front-loaded purpose and critical nuance about non-interactivity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Fairly complete for a scaffolding tool with no output schema. Could mention that it creates files in a new directory, but not essential.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Description does not elaborate on parameters beyond what schema provides. With 100% schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it scaffolds a new Juno project using Vite and adding Juno SDK/config, distinguishing it from sibling tools like juno_auth_status or juno_config_apply.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (creating a new project) but lacks explicit when-not or alternatives. However, no sibling tool overlaps, so context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.