wp_list_custom_webhooks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. 'List' implies a non-mutating read operation, and 'configured on the site' adds useful scope. However, it does not disclose whether permissions are required, whether disabled webhooks are included, or whether any pagination or limits apply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word contributes meaning: 'List', 'custom MCP outbound', and 'configured on the site' all clarify the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema list tool, the description is largely complete. It names the exact resource being listed. The only minor gap is that it does not explicitly describe the return format, but for a simple list tool this is reasonably inferable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters and the schema description coverage is 100%, so there are no parameter meanings to add. A 0-parameter tool needs no parameter explanation, and the description accurately describes the list operation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('List') and a specific resource ('custom MCP outbound webhooks configured on the site'). It clearly distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like wp_get_custom_webhook, wp_create_custom_webhook, wp_update_custom_webhook, and wp_delete_custom_webhook by indicating it lists rather than operates on a single webhook.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives. While it is obvious this lists custom MCP outbound webhooks, it does not mention related tools such as wp_list_webhook_deliveries, wp_list_woocommerce_webhooks, or wp_list_form_webhooks, nor does it state conditions for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.