navigate_page
Navigate the selected Firefox tab to a specified URL for browser automation, testing, and scraping.
Instructions
Navigate selected tab to URL.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Target URL |
Navigate the selected Firefox tab to a specified URL for browser automation, testing, and scraping.
Navigate selected tab to URL.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | Target URL |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
v1.0.0Input schema / properties / url / descriptionPrevious value: -"URL to navigate the page to"New value: +"Target URL"Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, and the description 'Navigate' aligns with mutation. However, no additional behavioral context (e.g., page load behavior or error handling) is provided beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One short sentence with no extraneous information; every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple navigation tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but lacks details on post-navigation behavior or failure modes.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema coverage, the parameter 'url' has a description 'Target URL' in the schema. The description adds no extra meaning, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Navigate selected tab to URL' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like navigate_history.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any conditions or prerequisites for navigation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mozilla/firefox-devtools-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server