Skip to main content
Glama

Logic Tree MCP Server

An advanced MCP server implementation for hierarchical problem analysis using logic trees with sophisticated analytical capabilities. This server enables structured thinking through visual tree representations that break down complex problems into manageable, interconnected components while providing MECE validation, hypothesis generation, and feasibility assessment.

Features

Core Capabilities

  • Hierarchical problem decomposition with rich metadata support

  • MECE validation (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) with overlap detection

  • Hypothesis generation and reasoning support for evidence-based analysis

  • Feasibility assessment with actionability scoring for solutions

  • Gap analysis to identify missing causes, effects, or solutions

  • Confidence and priority tracking with evidence-based reasoning

Tree Operations

  • Multiple node types (problem, cause, effect, solution, decision, option)

  • Advanced node creation with confidence, priority, feasibility, evidence, and assumptions

  • Tree operations (add, remove, move, update nodes)

  • Visual tree representation with colored nodes and metadata display

  • Comprehensive tree analysis with recommendations

AI Guidance Features

  • Smart workflow guidance with next-step recommendations

  • Quick analysis optimized for AI consumption

  • Current status assessment with contextual suggestions

  • Automatic recommendation generation based on tree state

Analysis Features

  • Root cause analysis with hypothesis testing

  • Decision tree support with feasibility scoring

  • MECE validation and gap analysis

  • Logic validation and consistency checking

  • Action planning with concrete step identification

Related MCP server: CRASH - Cascaded Reasoning with Adaptive Step Handling

Tool

logictree

Facilitates hierarchical problem analysis through structured logic trees.

🚀 AI Guidance Operations (START HERE):

  • get_status: Get current tree status with AI guidance and next steps

  • next_steps: Get detailed workflow recommendations with specific actions

  • quick_analysis: Get focused analysis results optimized for AI consumption

📝 Basic Operations:

  • add_node: Create a new node with optional metadata (confidence, priority, feasibility, evidence, assumptions, tags)

  • remove_node: Delete a node and all its children

  • move_node: Change a node's parent to restructure the tree

  • update_node: Modify existing node content or metadata

  • visualize_tree: Display the complete tree structure with metadata

🔍 Advanced Analysis Operations:

  • analyze_tree: Get comprehensive tree analysis with MECE validation and recommendations

  • generate_hypotheses: Generate testable hypotheses for a specific node

  • suggest_actions: Get prioritized recommendations for improvement

Node Types:

  • problem: The main issue or question to be addressed

  • cause: Contributing factors or root causes

  • effect: Consequences or outcomes

  • solution: Proposed fixes or answers

  • decision: Choice points or decision branches

  • option: Available alternatives or choices

Parameters:

  • operation (required): The action to perform

  • nodeId: Target node identifier (for node-specific operations)

  • content: Text content for new nodes (required for add_node)

  • nodeType: Node category (required for add_node)

  • parentId: Parent node for new nodes (optional for root)

  • newParentId: New parent when moving nodes

Enhanced Metadata Parameters (within metadata object):

  • metadata.confidence: Confidence level (0-1) in the node's validity

  • metadata.priority: Priority level (1-5) for solutions and actions

  • metadata.feasibility: Feasibility score (1-5) for solution implementation

  • metadata.evidence: Array of supporting evidence or data sources

  • metadata.assumptions: Array of underlying assumptions

  • metadata.tags: Array of categorization tags for organization

Usage Examples

// 1. Start with status check (ALWAYS begin with this)
{"operation": "get_status"}
// Response includes: current state, AI guidance, suggested next operations

// 2. If tree is empty, AI will guide you to create root problem
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Low website conversion rate", "nodeType": "problem"}

// 3. Check progress and get next steps
{"operation": "quick_analysis"}
// Response: focused insights, key findings, next actions, AI guidance

// 4. Get specific next step recommendations
{"operation": "next_steps"}
// Response: exact parameters to use, workflow guidance, reasoning

Basic Problem Analysis

// 1. Create root problem
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Low website conversion rate", "nodeType": "problem"}

// 2. Add potential causes with metadata
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Slow page load times", "nodeType": "cause", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["Google Analytics shows 5s average load time", "User feedback mentions slow performance"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Confusing navigation", "nodeType": "cause", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"confidence": 0.6, "evidence": ["Heatmap data shows scattered clicks"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Weak call-to-action", "nodeType": "cause", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"confidence": 0.7}}

// 3. Add solutions with priority and feasibility
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Optimize images and compress CSS/JS files by 30%", "nodeType": "solution", "parentId": "node_2", "metadata": {"priority": 5, "feasibility": 4, "assumptions": ["Development team has 2 weeks availability"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Redesign main navigation menu with user testing", "nodeType": "solution", "parentId": "node_3", "metadata": {"priority": 3, "feasibility": 2}}

// 4. Get comprehensive analysis
{"operation": "analyze_tree"}

// 5. Generate hypotheses for testing
{"operation": "generate_hypotheses", "nodeId": "node_1"}

// 6. Get action recommendations
{"operation": "suggest_actions"}

Advanced Analysis Workflow

// 1. Create decision point with assumptions
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Choose marketing channel for Q1 campaign", "nodeType": "decision", "metadata": {"assumptions": ["Budget limit of $50k", "Target audience is 25-45 professionals"]}}

// 2. Add options with feasibility scores
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Social media advertising (LinkedIn/Facebook)", "nodeType": "option", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"feasibility": 5, "priority": 4, "evidence": ["Previous campaign achieved 3.2% CTR"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Email marketing to existing database", "nodeType": "option", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"feasibility": 4, "priority": 3, "evidence": ["Database of 15k subscribers"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Content marketing blog series", "nodeType": "option", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"feasibility": 2, "priority": 2}}

// 3. Get action recommendations
{"operation": "suggest_actions"}

// 4. Comprehensive analysis
{"operation": "analyze_tree"}

// 5. Visualize the complete tree
{"operation": "visualize_tree"}

Configuration

Usage with Claude Desktop

Add this to your claude_desktop_config.json:

docker

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "logictree": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "--rm",
        "-i",
        "mostlyfine/mcp-logictree"
      ]
    }
  }
}

To disable logging of tree visualizations set env var: DISABLE_TREE_LOGGING to true.

Usage with VS Code

For Docker installation:

{
  "mcp": {
    "servers": {
      "logic-tree": {
        "command": "docker",
        "args": [
          "run",
          "--rm",
          "-i",
          "mostlyfine/mcp-logictree"
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}

Building

Local Development

npm install
npm run build

Docker

docker build -t mostlyfine/mcp-logictree .

Use Cases

Business Analysis

  • Root Cause Analysis: Break down problems with MECE validation and evidence tracking

  • Decision Making: Structure choices with feasibility assessment and priority ranking

  • Strategic Planning: Create hierarchical project breakdowns with actionability scoring

  • Risk Assessment: Identify gaps and validate assumptions in risk analysis

Problem Solving

  • Technical Troubleshooting: Systematically analyze issues with hypothesis generation

  • Process Improvement: Map current state problems and evaluate solution feasibility

  • Quality Analysis: Structure quality issues with evidence-based cause identification

  • Systems Thinking: Map complex relationships with confidence scoring

Research and Analysis

  • Hypothesis Testing: Generate testable hypotheses for research questions

  • Gap Analysis: Identify missing elements in research or analysis

  • Evidence Organization: Structure findings with confidence levels and supporting data

  • Recommendation Development: Create actionable recommendations with priority scoring

Project Management

  • Issue Resolution: Structure project problems with feasibility-assessed solutions

  • Stakeholder Analysis: Map stakeholder concerns with evidence and priority levels

  • Risk Management: Analyze project risks with comprehensive cause-effect mapping

  • Decision Documentation: Create evidence-based decision trees with clear rationale

License

This MCP server is licensed under the MIT License. This means you are free to use, modify, and distribute the software, subject to the terms and conditions of the MIT License. For more details, please see the LICENSE file in the project repository.

Available Tools

1 tool
logictreeA

AI Logic Tree Analyst

A powerful tool for hierarchical problem analysis with AI guidance. This tool helps break down complex problems into structured logic trees, provides workflow guidance, and ensures continuous AI engagement through smart recommendations.


Main Features

  • AI-Guided Workflow: Smart guidance and next-step recommendations

  • Quick Analysis: Focused outputs optimized for AI consumption

  • Hierarchical Structuring: Organize problems, causes, and solutions

  • MECE Validation: Automatically check logical completeness

  • Solution Assessment: Evaluate feasibility and priority

  • Evidence-Based Reasoning: Support analysis with data and assumptions


Commands (Operations)

🚀 AI Guidance Operations (START HERE)

  • get_status: Get current tree status with AI guidance and next steps

  • next_steps: Get detailed workflow recommendations with specific actions

  • quick_analysis: Get focused analysis results optimized for AI consumption

📝 Basic Operations

  • add_node: Create a new node in the tree

  • update_node: Modify existing node content or metadata

  • remove_node: Delete a node and all descendants

  • visualize_tree: Display the complete tree structure

🔍 Advanced Analysis

  • analyze_tree: Comprehensive analysis with MECE validation

  • generate_hypotheses: Generate testable hypotheses for a node

  • suggest_actions: Get prioritized action recommendations


AI Workflow Integration

For continuous AI engagement, ALWAYS use these operations:

  1. Start any session: {"operation": "get_status"}

    • Gets current state and what to do next

    • Provides AI guidance for next steps

  2. After each major action: {"operation": "quick_analysis"}

    • Gets focused insights without overwhelming output

    • Tells AI exactly what to do next

  3. When unsure: {"operation": "next_steps"}

    • Gets specific parameter templates

    • Shows complete workflow guidance


Streamlined Parameter Usage

Simple node creation: {"operation": "add_node", "content": "Your problem", "nodeType": "problem"}

With metadata (for solutions): {"operation": "add_node", "content": "Solution", "nodeType": "solution", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"priority": 4, "feasibility": 3}}

Check what to do next: {"operation": "get_status"}


Example AI Session

Start (ALWAYS begin with this): {"operation": "get_status"}

Response includes: current state, AI guidance, suggested next operations

If tree is empty, AI will be guided to: {"operation": "add_node", "content": "Low website conversion", "nodeType": "problem"}

After adding nodes, check progress: {"operation": "quick_analysis"}

Response: focused insights, key findings, next actions, AI guidance

Get specific next steps: {"operation": "next_steps"}

Response: exact parameters to use, workflow guidance, reasoning

This design ensures AI continues using the tool by providing clear guidance and focused outputs.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nodeIdNoTarget node identifier (required for node-specific operations)
contentNoText content for the node (required for add_node)
metadataNoAdditional attributes for the node (optional)
nodeTypeNoType/category of the node (required for add_node)
parentIdNoParent node identifier (optional for root nodes)
operationYesThe operation to perform on the logic tree. Start with 'get_status' for AI guidance.
newParentIdNoNew parent node identifier (for move_node operation)

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It does reveal meaningful traits: remove_node deletes a node and all descendants (destructive behavior), quick_analysis is intentionally focused to avoid overwhelming output, and guidance operations return AI recommendations and exact parameter templates. However, it does not cover persistence, preconditions/permissions, error behavior, or side effects of analyze_tree and generate_hypotheses.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is heavily redundant: the Main Features list largely restates the command catalog, the Example AI Session re-walks the Workflow Integration steps, and closing lines like 'This design ensures AI continues using the tool' are self-promotional rather than operational. It is well-structured with headers and emojis, but at roughly 700 words for a simple workflow, many sentences do not earn their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is broad for a complex 7-parameter/11-operation tool with no output schema: nearly every operation is described in prose and response shapes are hinted at ('Response includes: current state, AI guidance'). However, move_node is absent from the command catalog despite appearing in the schema enum, and per-operation parameter requirements and return content are only sketched. These gaps matter more precisely because no output schema exists to fill them.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all seven parameters and the nested metadata object, placing this at baseline 3. The description adds limited value through concrete payload templates such as add_node with content/nodeType and solution nodes with parentId plus metadata priority/feasibility. These examples illustrate valid combinations but largely duplicate what the schema already conveys.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly frames the tool as an AI-guided hierarchical problem analysis system that breaks complex problems into structured logic trees. It enumerates ten named operations grouped into AI Guidance, Basic, and Advanced categories, making its scope explicit. As a multi-operation umbrella tool with no siblings to differentiate from, the stated purpose plus the internal command catalog give an agent a solid model of what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'AI Workflow Integration' section prescribes explicit invocation rules: always start with get_status, run quick_analysis after each major action, and call next_steps when unsure. The 'START HERE' labeling and the ordered workflow give concrete when-to-use conditions for each operation. No sibling tools exist, so external routing is moot, but internal command selection guidance is exceptionally concrete and actionable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool updatev0.1.0
    • First observedlogictree

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The internal operations are mostly distinct, but get_status, next_steps, and quick_analysis all return guidance/next-step information, while analyze_tree, generate_hypotheses, and suggest_actions overlap in analytical purpose. The descriptions help clarify intended use, but the boundaries are not crisp.

Naming Consistency4/5

Operation names use consistent snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern such as add_node, update_node, and visualize_tree. Minor exceptions like next_steps and quick_analysis break the pattern, and the single MCP tool name 'logictree' is not verb-based, but overall the naming is systematic.

Tool Count2/5

A single MCP tool bundles ten operations across three feature categories, which is far too coarse for the breadth of the server's purpose. The operations should be exposed as separate MCP tools rather than hidden behind an 'operation' string.

Completeness4/5

The internal operations cover the core logic-tree lifecycle: create, update, delete, visualize, analyze, generate hypotheses, and suggest actions. There are minor gaps like no dedicated single-node retrieval or export/import capability, but the domain is generally well covered.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides tools for structuring complex problems through narrative-based sequential story elements or systematic sequential thinking, helping make complex problems more memorable and easier to understand.
    15
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides access to 27+ structured problem-solving frameworks and game-theoretic workflows for software development, project management, and operations research. Helps prevent analysis paralysis and scope creep by transforming open-ended challenges into systematic, time-boxed approaches with clear decision gates.
    5
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mostlyfine/mcp-logictree'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server