logictree
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@logictreeanalyze declining sales using a logic tree"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Logic Tree MCP Server
An advanced MCP server implementation for hierarchical problem analysis using logic trees with sophisticated analytical capabilities. This server enables structured thinking through visual tree representations that break down complex problems into manageable, interconnected components while providing MECE validation, hypothesis generation, and feasibility assessment.
Features
Core Capabilities
Hierarchical problem decomposition with rich metadata support
MECE validation (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) with overlap detection
Hypothesis generation and reasoning support for evidence-based analysis
Feasibility assessment with actionability scoring for solutions
Gap analysis to identify missing causes, effects, or solutions
Confidence and priority tracking with evidence-based reasoning
Tree Operations
Multiple node types (problem, cause, effect, solution, decision, option)
Advanced node creation with confidence, priority, feasibility, evidence, and assumptions
Tree operations (add, remove, move, update nodes)
Visual tree representation with colored nodes and metadata display
Comprehensive tree analysis with recommendations
AI Guidance Features
Smart workflow guidance with next-step recommendations
Quick analysis optimized for AI consumption
Current status assessment with contextual suggestions
Automatic recommendation generation based on tree state
Analysis Features
Root cause analysis with hypothesis testing
Decision tree support with feasibility scoring
MECE validation and gap analysis
Logic validation and consistency checking
Action planning with concrete step identification
Related MCP server: CRASH - Cascaded Reasoning with Adaptive Step Handling
Tool
logictree
Facilitates hierarchical problem analysis through structured logic trees.
🚀 AI Guidance Operations (START HERE):
get_status: Get current tree status with AI guidance and next stepsnext_steps: Get detailed workflow recommendations with specific actionsquick_analysis: Get focused analysis results optimized for AI consumption
📝 Basic Operations:
add_node: Create a new node with optional metadata (confidence, priority, feasibility, evidence, assumptions, tags)remove_node: Delete a node and all its childrenmove_node: Change a node's parent to restructure the treeupdate_node: Modify existing node content or metadatavisualize_tree: Display the complete tree structure with metadata
🔍 Advanced Analysis Operations:
analyze_tree: Get comprehensive tree analysis with MECE validation and recommendationsgenerate_hypotheses: Generate testable hypotheses for a specific nodesuggest_actions: Get prioritized recommendations for improvement
Node Types:
problem: The main issue or question to be addressedcause: Contributing factors or root causeseffect: Consequences or outcomessolution: Proposed fixes or answersdecision: Choice points or decision branchesoption: Available alternatives or choices
Parameters:
operation(required): The action to performnodeId: Target node identifier (for node-specific operations)content: Text content for new nodes (required for add_node)nodeType: Node category (required for add_node)parentId: Parent node for new nodes (optional for root)newParentId: New parent when moving nodes
Enhanced Metadata Parameters (within metadata object):
metadata.confidence: Confidence level (0-1) in the node's validitymetadata.priority: Priority level (1-5) for solutions and actionsmetadata.feasibility: Feasibility score (1-5) for solution implementationmetadata.evidence: Array of supporting evidence or data sourcesmetadata.assumptions: Array of underlying assumptionsmetadata.tags: Array of categorization tags for organization
Usage Examples
AI-Guided Workflow (Recommended)
// 1. Start with status check (ALWAYS begin with this)
{"operation": "get_status"}
// Response includes: current state, AI guidance, suggested next operations
// 2. If tree is empty, AI will guide you to create root problem
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Low website conversion rate", "nodeType": "problem"}
// 3. Check progress and get next steps
{"operation": "quick_analysis"}
// Response: focused insights, key findings, next actions, AI guidance
// 4. Get specific next step recommendations
{"operation": "next_steps"}
// Response: exact parameters to use, workflow guidance, reasoningBasic Problem Analysis
// 1. Create root problem
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Low website conversion rate", "nodeType": "problem"}
// 2. Add potential causes with metadata
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Slow page load times", "nodeType": "cause", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"confidence": 0.8, "evidence": ["Google Analytics shows 5s average load time", "User feedback mentions slow performance"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Confusing navigation", "nodeType": "cause", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"confidence": 0.6, "evidence": ["Heatmap data shows scattered clicks"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Weak call-to-action", "nodeType": "cause", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"confidence": 0.7}}
// 3. Add solutions with priority and feasibility
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Optimize images and compress CSS/JS files by 30%", "nodeType": "solution", "parentId": "node_2", "metadata": {"priority": 5, "feasibility": 4, "assumptions": ["Development team has 2 weeks availability"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Redesign main navigation menu with user testing", "nodeType": "solution", "parentId": "node_3", "metadata": {"priority": 3, "feasibility": 2}}
// 4. Get comprehensive analysis
{"operation": "analyze_tree"}
// 5. Generate hypotheses for testing
{"operation": "generate_hypotheses", "nodeId": "node_1"}
// 6. Get action recommendations
{"operation": "suggest_actions"}Advanced Analysis Workflow
// 1. Create decision point with assumptions
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Choose marketing channel for Q1 campaign", "nodeType": "decision", "metadata": {"assumptions": ["Budget limit of $50k", "Target audience is 25-45 professionals"]}}
// 2. Add options with feasibility scores
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Social media advertising (LinkedIn/Facebook)", "nodeType": "option", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"feasibility": 5, "priority": 4, "evidence": ["Previous campaign achieved 3.2% CTR"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Email marketing to existing database", "nodeType": "option", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"feasibility": 4, "priority": 3, "evidence": ["Database of 15k subscribers"]}}
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Content marketing blog series", "nodeType": "option", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"feasibility": 2, "priority": 2}}
// 3. Get action recommendations
{"operation": "suggest_actions"}
// 4. Comprehensive analysis
{"operation": "analyze_tree"}
// 5. Visualize the complete tree
{"operation": "visualize_tree"}Configuration
Usage with Claude Desktop
Add this to your claude_desktop_config.json:
docker
{
"mcpServers": {
"logictree": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"mostlyfine/mcp-logictree"
]
}
}
}To disable logging of tree visualizations set env var: DISABLE_TREE_LOGGING to true.
Usage with VS Code
For Docker installation:
{
"mcp": {
"servers": {
"logic-tree": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"--rm",
"-i",
"mostlyfine/mcp-logictree"
]
}
}
}
}Building
Local Development
npm install
npm run buildDocker
docker build -t mostlyfine/mcp-logictree .Use Cases
Business Analysis
Root Cause Analysis: Break down problems with MECE validation and evidence tracking
Decision Making: Structure choices with feasibility assessment and priority ranking
Strategic Planning: Create hierarchical project breakdowns with actionability scoring
Risk Assessment: Identify gaps and validate assumptions in risk analysis
Problem Solving
Technical Troubleshooting: Systematically analyze issues with hypothesis generation
Process Improvement: Map current state problems and evaluate solution feasibility
Quality Analysis: Structure quality issues with evidence-based cause identification
Systems Thinking: Map complex relationships with confidence scoring
Research and Analysis
Hypothesis Testing: Generate testable hypotheses for research questions
Gap Analysis: Identify missing elements in research or analysis
Evidence Organization: Structure findings with confidence levels and supporting data
Recommendation Development: Create actionable recommendations with priority scoring
Project Management
Issue Resolution: Structure project problems with feasibility-assessed solutions
Stakeholder Analysis: Map stakeholder concerns with evidence and priority levels
Risk Management: Analyze project risks with comprehensive cause-effect mapping
Decision Documentation: Create evidence-based decision trees with clear rationale
License
This MCP server is licensed under the MIT License. This means you are free to use, modify, and distribute the software, subject to the terms and conditions of the MIT License. For more details, please see the LICENSE file in the project repository.
Available Tools
1 toollogictreeA
AI Logic Tree Analyst
A powerful tool for hierarchical problem analysis with AI guidance. This tool helps break down complex problems into structured logic trees, provides workflow guidance, and ensures continuous AI engagement through smart recommendations.
Main Features
AI-Guided Workflow: Smart guidance and next-step recommendations
Quick Analysis: Focused outputs optimized for AI consumption
Hierarchical Structuring: Organize problems, causes, and solutions
MECE Validation: Automatically check logical completeness
Solution Assessment: Evaluate feasibility and priority
Evidence-Based Reasoning: Support analysis with data and assumptions
Commands (Operations)
🚀 AI Guidance Operations (START HERE)
get_status: Get current tree status with AI guidance and next stepsnext_steps: Get detailed workflow recommendations with specific actionsquick_analysis: Get focused analysis results optimized for AI consumption
📝 Basic Operations
add_node: Create a new node in the treeupdate_node: Modify existing node content or metadataremove_node: Delete a node and all descendantsvisualize_tree: Display the complete tree structure
🔍 Advanced Analysis
analyze_tree: Comprehensive analysis with MECE validationgenerate_hypotheses: Generate testable hypotheses for a nodesuggest_actions: Get prioritized action recommendations
AI Workflow Integration
For continuous AI engagement, ALWAYS use these operations:
Start any session:
{"operation": "get_status"}Gets current state and what to do next
Provides AI guidance for next steps
After each major action:
{"operation": "quick_analysis"}Gets focused insights without overwhelming output
Tells AI exactly what to do next
When unsure:
{"operation": "next_steps"}Gets specific parameter templates
Shows complete workflow guidance
Streamlined Parameter Usage
Simple node creation:
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Your problem", "nodeType": "problem"}
With metadata (for solutions):
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Solution", "nodeType": "solution", "parentId": "node_1", "metadata": {"priority": 4, "feasibility": 3}}
Check what to do next:
{"operation": "get_status"}
Example AI Session
Start (ALWAYS begin with this):
{"operation": "get_status"}
Response includes: current state, AI guidance, suggested next operations
If tree is empty, AI will be guided to:
{"operation": "add_node", "content": "Low website conversion", "nodeType": "problem"}
After adding nodes, check progress:
{"operation": "quick_analysis"}
Response: focused insights, key findings, next actions, AI guidance
Get specific next steps:
{"operation": "next_steps"}
Response: exact parameters to use, workflow guidance, reasoning
This design ensures AI continues using the tool by providing clear guidance and focused outputs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | No | Target node identifier (required for node-specific operations) | |
| content | No | Text content for the node (required for add_node) | |
| metadata | No | Additional attributes for the node (optional) | |
| nodeType | No | Type/category of the node (required for add_node) | |
| parentId | No | Parent node identifier (optional for root nodes) | |
| operation | Yes | The operation to perform on the logic tree. Start with 'get_status' for AI guidance. | |
| newParentId | No | New parent node identifier (for move_node operation) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It does reveal meaningful traits: remove_node deletes a node and all descendants (destructive behavior), quick_analysis is intentionally focused to avoid overwhelming output, and guidance operations return AI recommendations and exact parameter templates. However, it does not cover persistence, preconditions/permissions, error behavior, or side effects of analyze_tree and generate_hypotheses.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is heavily redundant: the Main Features list largely restates the command catalog, the Example AI Session re-walks the Workflow Integration steps, and closing lines like 'This design ensures AI continues using the tool' are self-promotional rather than operational. It is well-structured with headers and emojis, but at roughly 700 words for a simple workflow, many sentences do not earn their place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is broad for a complex 7-parameter/11-operation tool with no output schema: nearly every operation is described in prose and response shapes are hinted at ('Response includes: current state, AI guidance'). However, move_node is absent from the command catalog despite appearing in the schema enum, and per-operation parameter requirements and return content are only sketched. These gaps matter more precisely because no output schema exists to fill them.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all seven parameters and the nested metadata object, placing this at baseline 3. The description adds limited value through concrete payload templates such as add_node with content/nodeType and solution nodes with parentId plus metadata priority/feasibility. These examples illustrate valid combinations but largely duplicate what the schema already conveys.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly frames the tool as an AI-guided hierarchical problem analysis system that breaks complex problems into structured logic trees. It enumerates ten named operations grouped into AI Guidance, Basic, and Advanced categories, making its scope explicit. As a multi-operation umbrella tool with no siblings to differentiate from, the stated purpose plus the internal command catalog give an agent a solid model of what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The 'AI Workflow Integration' section prescribes explicit invocation rules: always start with get_status, run quick_analysis after each major action, and call next_steps when unsure. The 'START HERE' labeling and the ordered workflow give concrete when-to-use conditions for each operation. No sibling tools exist, so external routing is moot, but internal command selection guidance is exceptionally concrete and actionable.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v0.1.0- First observed
logictree
TDQS
The internal operations are mostly distinct, but get_status, next_steps, and quick_analysis all return guidance/next-step information, while analyze_tree, generate_hypotheses, and suggest_actions overlap in analytical purpose. The descriptions help clarify intended use, but the boundaries are not crisp.
Operation names use consistent snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern such as add_node, update_node, and visualize_tree. Minor exceptions like next_steps and quick_analysis break the pattern, and the single MCP tool name 'logictree' is not verb-based, but overall the naming is systematic.
A single MCP tool bundles ten operations across three feature categories, which is far too coarse for the breadth of the server's purpose. The operations should be exposed as separate MCP tools rather than hidden behind an 'operation' string.
The internal operations cover the core logic-tree lifecycle: create, update, delete, visualize, analyze, generate hypotheses, and suggest actions. There are minor gaps like no dedicated single-node retrieval or export/import capability, but the domain is generally well covered.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Search 10,000+ consulting frameworks, templates, financial models, and management case studies
- LiminalityOAuthai.physea
Breaks a hard question or decision into checkable sub-questions, grounds each to a real tool.
1 Multi-expert decision intelligence with transparent synthesis and auditable workflows.
Deterministic reasoning stack for AI agents: simulate, decide & compute, plus cross-domain tools.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for structuring complex problems through narrative-based sequential story elements or systematic sequential thinking, helping make complex problems more memorable and easier to understand.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables structured, iterative reasoning for complex problem-solving with features like confidence tracking, revision mechanisms, and branching support. Provides flexible validation and multiple output formats for systematic analysis and decision-making tasks.12272MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to 27+ structured problem-solving frameworks and game-theoretic workflows for software development, project management, and operations research. Helps prevent analysis paralysis and scope creep by transforming open-ended challenges into systematic, time-boxed approaches with clear decision gates.5MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables structured problem-solving through sequential thinking stages with persistent storage and analysis. Helps break down complex problems into manageable cognitive steps while tracking progress and generating summaries of the entire thought process.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mostlyfine/mcp-logictree'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server