Memgraph MCP Server
Official[!ВАЖНЫЙ]
Этот репозиторий был объединен с монорепозиторием Memgraph AI Toolkit во избежание дублирования инструментов.
Он будет удален через месяц — следите за интеграцией MCP там для всех будущих разработок и не стесняйтесь открывать проблемы или PR в этом репозитории.
🚀 Memgraph MCP-сервер
Memgraph MCP Server — это облегченная серверная реализация Model Context Protocol (MCP), предназначенная для соединения Memgraph с LLM.

⚡ Быстрый старт
1. Запустите сервер Memgraph MCP
Установите
uvи создайтеvenvс помощьюuv venv. Активируйте виртуальную среду с помощью.venv\Scripts\activate.Установить зависимости:
uv add "mcp[cli]" httpxЗапустите сервер Memgraph MCP:
uv run server.py.
2. Запустите MCP-клиент
Установите Claude для рабочего стола .
Добавьте сервер Memgraph в конфигурацию Клода:
MacOS/Linux
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.jsonОкна
code $env:AppData\Claude\claude_desktop_config.jsonПример конфигурации:
{
"mcpServers": {
"mpc-memgraph": {
"command": "/Users/katelatte/.local/bin/uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
"/Users/katelatte/projects/mcp-memgraph",
"run",
"server.py"
]
}
}
}[!ПРИМЕЧАНИЕ]
Вам может потребоваться ввести полный путь к исполняемому файлу uv в поле команды. Вы можете получить это, запустивwhich uvна MacOS/Linux илиwhere uvна Windows. Убедитесь, что вы передаете абсолютный путь к вашему серверу.
3. Чат с базой данных
Запустите Memgraph MAGE:
docker run -p 7687:7687 memgraph/memgraph-mage --schema-info-enabled=TrueПараметр конфигурации
--schema-info-enabledустановлен вTrue, чтобы разрешить LLM выполнять запросSHOW SCHEMA INFO.Откройте Claude Desktop и посмотрите список инструментов и ресурсов Memgraph. Попробуйте! (Вы можете загрузить фиктивные данные из Memgraph Lab Datasets)
Related MCP server: mcp-graphql
🔧Инструменты
запустить_запрос()
Запустите запрос Cypher к Memgraph.
🗃️ Ресурсы
получить_схему()
Получить информацию о схеме Memgraph (предварительное условие: --schema-info-enabled=True ).
🗺️ Дорожная карта
Memgraph MCP Server только начинает свое развитие. Мы активно работаем над расширением его возможностей и еще более упрощаем интеграцию Memgraph в современные рабочие процессы ИИ. В ближайшем будущем мы выпустим версию сервера TypeScript для лучшей поддержки сред на основе JavaScript. Кроме того, мы планируем перенести этот проект в наш центральный репозиторий AI Toolkit , где он будет жить вместе с другими инструментами и интеграциями для LangChain, LlamaIndex и MCP. Наша цель — предоставить унифицированный инструментарий с открытым исходным кодом, который позволит легко создавать графовые приложения и интеллектуальные агенты с Memgraph в основе.
Available Tools
1 toolrun_queryC
Run a query against Memgraph
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the action without behavioral details. It doesn't disclose if this is read-only or mutating, what permissions are needed, error handling, or performance implications (e.g., timeouts, rate limits). This leaves significant gaps for safe invocation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence with no wasted words—it's front-loaded and appropriately sized for a simple tool. Every word earns its place by stating the core action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description is incomplete. It doesn't cover behavioral traits, parameter details, or return values, making it inadequate for a tool that likely executes database operations with potential side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no parameter semantics beyond the schema's 'query' field. It doesn't explain what the query should contain (e.g., syntax, format), expected inputs, or constraints, failing to compensate for the low coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Run a query against Memgraph' clearly states the action (run) and target (Memgraph), but it's vague about what type of query (Cypher? SQL?) and what resources are affected. Without sibling tools, differentiation isn't needed, but the purpose remains somewhat generic.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool—there are no alternatives mentioned, no context for usage, and no prerequisites or exclusions. The description assumes the agent knows when to run queries without any framing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
run_query
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'run_query' follows a clear verb_noun pattern.
One tool is too few for a database server's apparent scope, as it severely limits functionality (e.g., no schema management, data manipulation beyond queries, or connection handling). This is a significant mismatch for the domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a database server. It only supports running queries, lacking essential operations like creating/dropping databases, managing schemas, listing tables, or handling transactions, which will cause frequent agent failures.
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
A Model Context Protocol server for Wix AI tools
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Model Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server
The Grafbase MCP server sits in front of a GraphQL API and exposes an MCP protocol-compliant interface that allows AI agents and LLMs to explore and query GraphQL APIs using natural language. It provides tools to search schemas, introspect types and fields, and execute GraphQL queries while minimizing context bloat by returning only relevant schema subsets, with built-in support for authentication, authorization, and configurable access control.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables LLMs to interact with NebulaGraph database for graph exploration, supporting schema understanding, queries, and graph algorithms.528Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with GraphQL APIs by providing schema introspection and query execution capabilities.1,3173MIT
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with databases (currently MongoDB) through natural language, supporting operations like querying, inserting, deleting documents, and running aggregation pipelines.514MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with GraphQL APIs by providing schema introspection and query execution capabilities.21MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/memgraph/mcp-memgraph'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server