Gitingest MCP Server
Provides analysis and content access for Git repositories, including repository summaries, file/directory structures, and full content with configurable filtering options.
Enables access to GitHub repositories including private repositories through Personal Access Token authentication for repository analysis and content ingestion.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Gitingest MCP Serveranalyze https://github.com/example/repo and show me the file structure"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Gitingest MCP server
An MCP server for gitingest that provides access to Git repository analysis through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This server leverages the gitingest library to analyze Git repositories and make their content available in a format optimized for LLMs.
Overview
This MCP server provides a single unified tool for accessing Git repository data. It automatically handles repository ingestion as needed, so users can immediately query repository content without an explicit ingestion step.
Related MCP server: GitHub MCP Server
Tool: gitingest
The server provides a single tool called gitingest that can be used to analyze Git repositories. The tool accepts the following parameters:
repo_uri(required): URL or local path to the Git repositoryresource_type: Type of data to retrieve (summary,tree,content, orall). Default issummary.max_file_size: Maximum file size in bytes to include in the analysis. Default is 10MB.include_patterns: Comma-separated patterns of files to include in the analysis.exclude_patterns: Comma-separated patterns of files to exclude from the analysis.branch: Specific branch to analyze.output: File path to save the output to.max_tokens: Truncates the response to a specified number of tokens.
Accessing Private Repositories
You can ingest private GitHub repositories by providing a GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT).
Recommended: Set an Environment Variable in your MCP Config
This is the best approach for persistent configuration. Add an env block to your server definition in your MCP configuration file. The gitingest library will automatically use the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable.
"mcpServers": {
"mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcp"
],
"env": {
"GITHUB_TOKEN": "github_pat_..."
}
}
}Resource Types and Large Repositories
For large repositories, it's recommended to first request only the summary (which is the default). After ingestion, you can access more detailed information through the resources:
Use the
treeresource to explore the repository structureUse the
contentresource to access the full content (if not too large)
If the repository is too large, consider using include_patterns and/or exclude_patterns to limit the scope of the ingestion.
Accessing Resources After a Tool Call
After you call the gitingest tool for a repository, the server defines resources for that repository:
Summary: A high-level summary of the repository
Tree: The file/directory structure
Content: The full content (subject to size limits)
These resources can be accessed individually via the resources interface in any MCP-compatible client. This is useful for browsing or fetching specific aspects of a repository after ingestion.
Debugging
The best way to debug MCP servers is with the MCP Inspector.
You can launch the Inspector with your local server using this command:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector uv --directory /Users/matthias/Desktop/ai_projects/MCP-Server-Gitingest/mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcp run mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcpor using uvx for the mcp server:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector uvx https://github.com/mattdepaolis/mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcp.gitor using the PyPI package:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector uvx mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcpUpon launching, the Inspector will display a URL that you can access in your browser to begin debugging.
Available Tools
1 toolgitingestB
Access Git repository data with automatic ingestion as needed
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| repo_uri | Yes | URL or local path to the Git repository | |
| resource_type | No | Type of data to retrieve (default: summary) | |
| max_file_size | No | Maximum file size in bytes (default: 10MB) | |
| include_patterns | No | Comma-separated fnmatch-style glob patterns (e.g., 'src/module/*.py', 'docs/file.md'). | |
| exclude_patterns | No | Comma-separated fnmatch-style glob patterns (e.g., 'tests/*', '*.tmp'). | |
| branch | No | Specific branch to analyze | |
| output | No | File path to save the output to | |
| max_tokens | No | Maximum number of tokens to return (1 token = 4 characters). If set, response will be truncated. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'automatic ingestion as needed' which hints at some background processing behavior, but doesn't explain what 'ingestion' entails (e.g., cloning, indexing, caching), performance characteristics, error handling, or what happens when repository data is already available. For a tool with 8 parameters and no annotation coverage, this leaves significant behavioral gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that communicates the core functionality without waste. It's appropriately sized for the tool's complexity and gets straight to the point without unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 8 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is minimal. While the schema covers parameters well, the description doesn't address behavioral aspects, return values, or usage context that would help an agent understand when and how to invoke this tool effectively. It's adequate but leaves clear gaps in understanding the tool's full behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 8 parameters thoroughly. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's in the schema. According to the rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline is 3 even with no param info in the description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Access Git repository data with automatic ingestion as needed'. It specifies the verb ('access') and resource ('Git repository data'), and mentions the automatic ingestion feature. However, without sibling tools, it cannot demonstrate differentiation from alternatives, so it doesn't reach the highest score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or constraints. It mentions 'automatic ingestion as needed' but doesn't explain what triggers ingestion or when manual intervention might be required. There are no explicit when/when-not instructions or named alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v1.1.2- First observed
gitingest
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'gitingest' has a clearly defined purpose of accessing Git repository data with automatic ingestion, making it impossible for an agent to confuse it with other tools.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'gitingest' follows a single pattern with no deviations or mixing of conventions to evaluate, ensuring predictability.
A single tool is generally too few for a server's purpose, as it limits functionality and suggests an incomplete or overly narrow scope. For a Git-related server, one tool is insufficient to cover typical operations like cloning, committing, or branching, making it feel thin and underdeveloped.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a Git domain. While 'gitingest' handles data access and ingestion, it lacks essential operations such as repository management, version control actions, or querying specific Git objects, leading to significant gaps that will likely cause agent failures in broader workflows.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Code intelligence for LLMs. Analyze, search, and retrieve code from any public git repository.
Ask any GitHub repository a question. Get source-backed answers.
Screens public GitHub repos and PRs to generate risk maps, findings, and merge-readiness signals.
Git-backed platform for skills, tools, and context for AI agents
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to access GitHub repository contents as context, with features to fetch entire repositories, specific file contents, and repository structures for use in AI interactions.31182MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze GitHub repository structures and read file contents with features like directory traversal, file type analysis, syntax highlighting, and code pattern detection. Supports both public and private repositories through GitHub API integration.17Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to fetch, search, and retrieve markdown content from remote Git repositories. Supports both public and private repositories with authentication, allowing AI assistants to access documentation and notes stored in Git.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Git repository interaction and automation via LLMs, providing tools to read, search, and manipulate Git repositories.15162MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mattdepaolis/mattdepaolis-gitingest-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server