wp_set_blocksy_page_layout

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the transparency burden. It does disclose useful behavior: it reads the current protected page option and supports dry-run. However, it does not clarify the 'optional companion' dependency, permissions, failure modes, or side effects of writing the layout.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the main purpose. The second sentence adds behavioral value. The phrase 'optional companion' is vague but does not add length; the overall structure is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, this description is under-specified. It does not explain the 'optional companion' requirement, what the tool returns, how to confirm the change, or when this should be used instead of other page tools. The dry-run mention helps but is not enough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33%, so the description must compensate. It does partially: it explains sidebar values (right, left, no sidebar) and connects the action to a page. However, page_id and the dry-run behavior are not explained beyond the schema, leaving a meaningful gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action and resource: setting a Blocksy page's sidebar layout to right, left, or none. It is distinct from the sibling tools, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself from alternative page-modification tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives like wp_update_page, wp_get_page, or wp_list_sidebars. There are no contextual triggers, exclusions, or fallback instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.