Classify an AI use case under the EU AI Act — risk tier + cited rationale. Offline; checked against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, not legal advice.

List the EU AI Act obligations for a role + risk tier, each with its Article citation. Pass country (and sector) to also get the competent national authority. Offline.

Generate an Article 50 transparency disclosure snippet (chatbot / genai-content / deepfake / emotion), EN or DE. Offline.

Fetch a published Legalithm Trust Center compliance record by org slug. Online (reads the public API).

Draft the Article 50(1) disclosure an AI agent owes: what it is, who it acts for, and the limits of its delegated authority. Follows the Commission Article 50 Guidelines adopted 20 July 2026. Refuses rather than inventing a principal. Offline.

Reads file CONTENT you pass in (a package.json, source files) and proposes which AI capabilities the code could ship, with the evidence for each, then resolves those into Article 50 limbs with their dates and duty-bearers. Returns HYPOTHESES, never findings: a dependency proves what code could do, never what it ships. Offline, no network, nothing stored.

The six disclosure dimensions an AI agent owes under Article 50(1), plus the negative scope: what the Commission Guidelines confirm is NOT covered, including chain-of-thought, backend machine-to-machine calls and agent-to-agent traffic. Offline.