Implore MCP
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Implore MCPask me which database to use: PostgreSQL, MySQL, or MongoDB"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Implore MCP
MCP to Implore the Human Intelligence
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides a quiz-style tool to request input from humans via GUI dialogs. This tool allows AI assistants to "implore" human users for clarification, decisions, or knowledge extraction through an interactive visual interface.
Inspired by the Interactive Feedback MCP pattern.
Features
Quiz-Style Interface: Display multiple questions in a single, scrollable dialog
Multiple Question Types:
Multiple choice (radio buttons with automatic "Other..." option including text input)
Free-form text input
Process Isolation: GUI runs in a separate subprocess to avoid blocking the MCP server
Structured Responses: Get organized answers mapped to question IDs
FastMCP Integration: Built on FastMCP for easy MCP server implementation
Cross-Platform: Works on Windows, macOS, and Linux
Related MCP server: Ask Question MCP App
Architecture
The tool uses a decoupled architecture:
server.py: MCP server that handles tool requests and launches the GUI subprocessimplore_ui.py: Separate GUI process that displays quiz dialogs and communicates results via temporary filesCommunication via temporary JSON files ensures the main server process remains responsive
Installation
Clone or download this repository:
git clone <repository-url>
cd implore-mcpInstall dependencies using uv:
uv syncOr install directly:
uv pip install fastmcp>=2.0.0 psutil>=7.0.0 pyside6>=6.8.2.1Usage
Running the Server
Start the MCP server:
uv run server.pyOr using Python directly:
python server.pyConfiguring in MCP Clients
Add to your MCP client configuration (e.g., Claude Desktop, Cline):
Using uv:
{
"mcpServers": {
"implore": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "C:/path/to/implore-mcp/server.py"]
}
}
}Using Python directly:
{
"mcpServers": {
"implore": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["C:/path/to/implore-mcp/server.py"]
}
}
}Using the Tool
Once configured, the AI assistant can use the implore tool to request input from you:
Example 1: Single Free-Form Question
Tool: implore
Arguments: {
"questions": [
{
"text": "What is your preferred color scheme?",
"type": "free_form"
}
]
}
Result: {
"success": true,
"answers": {
"q1": "Dark mode"
}
}Example 2: Multiple Choice Question
Tool: implore
Arguments: {
"questions": [
{
"id": "framework",
"text": "Which web framework should we use?",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"options": ["React", "Vue", "Angular", "Svelte"]
}
],
"title": "Framework Selection"
}
Result: {
"success": true,
"answers": {
"framework": "React"
}
}Example 3: Mixed Question Types
Tool: implore
Arguments: {
"questions": [
{
"id": "deployment",
"text": "Where should we deploy the application?",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"options": ["AWS", "Azure", "Google Cloud", "On-Premise"]
},
{
"id": "timeline",
"text": "What is your preferred timeline?",
"type": "free_form"
},
{
"id": "budget",
"text": "What is your budget range?",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"options": ["Under $100", "$100-$500", "$500-$1000", "Over $1000"]
},
{
"id": "additional",
"text": "Any additional requirements or concerns?",
"type": "free_form"
}
],
"title": "Project Planning Questions"
}
Result: {
"success": true,
"answers": {
"deployment": "AWS",
"timeline": "2-3 months",
"budget": "$500-$1000",
"additional": "Need to support mobile devices"
}
}Tool Reference
implore
Displays a quiz-style GUI dialog to request input from the user. The dialog runs in a separate process and can handle multiple questions of different types.
Parameters:
questions(list, required): Array of question objects for quiz-style interfacetitle(str, optional): The title of the dialog window. Default: "Human Input Requested"
Question Object Structure:
Each question in the list should have:
text(str, required): The question text to displaytype(str, required): Either "multiple_choice" or "free_form"For "multiple_choice", an automatic "Other..." option with free-text input is always included after the provided options.
options(list, optional): List of option strings (required for multiple_choice)id(str, optional): Unique identifier (auto-generated as "q1", "q2", etc. if not provided)
Returns:
Dictionary with structured response:
Success:
{"success": True, "answers": {question_id: answer, ...}}Cancelled:
{"success": False, "cancelled": True}Error:
{"success": False, "error": "error message"}
Notes:
Multiple choice questions that aren't answered will have
nullvalueFree-form questions that aren't answered will have empty string value
Prefer using comprehensive multiple choice options for most questions to guide responses, reserving free-form for simple copy-paste values or easily answered open questions. The automatic "Other..." option in multiple choice provides flexibility for additional input.
Use Cases
The implore tool is perfect for:
Requirement Clarification: Ask users to clarify ambiguous requirements
Design Decisions: Get user preferences on architecture or design choices
Configuration Selection: Let users choose from predefined configuration options
Knowledge Extraction: Extract implicit knowledge from users through targeted questions
Progress Checkpoints: Confirm decisions before proceeding with major changes
Feature Prioritization: Ask users to prioritize features or tasks
Error Resolution: When multiple solutions exist, ask user which approach to take
Dependencies
fastmcp (>=2.0.0): FastMCP framework for building MCP servers
psutil (>=7.0.0): System and process utilities
pyside6 (>=6.8.2.1): Qt for Python - GUI framework
License
[Add your license here]
Contributing
[Add contribution guidelines here]
Credits
Developed with inspiration from the Interactive Feedback MCP pattern.
Available Tools
1 toolimploreA
This tool launches a separate GUI process to show a quiz with one or more questions and waits for the user to respond. Multiple choice questions include an automatic "Other..." option with text input for additional flexibility. Perfect for clarifying requirements, getting decisions, or extracting implicit knowledge from users.
Args: questions: A list of question objects. Each question object should have: - text (str): The question text - type (str): Either "multiple_choice" or "free_form". For "multiple_choice", an automatic "Other..." radio button with text input is included after the options. - options (list, optional): List of options for multiple choice questions - id (str, optional): Unique identifier (auto-generated as "q1", "q2", etc. if not provided) title: The title of the dialog window (default: "Human Input Requested")
Returns: Dictionary with structured response: - On success: {"success": True, "answers": {question_id: answer, ...}} - On cancel: {"success": False, "cancelled": True} - On error: {"success": False, "error": "error message"}
Notes:
Unanswered multiple choice questions return null
Unanswered free-form questions return empty string ""
Prefer using comprehensive multiple choice options for most questions to provide structured choices, reserving free-form for simple copy-paste values or easily answered open questions. The automatic "Other..." option in multiple choice provides flexibility for cases not covered by the options.
Examples: Single question: implore(questions=[ { "id": "api_key", "text": "What is your API key?", "type": "free_form" } ])
Multiple questions:
implore(questions=[
{
"id": "framework",
"text": "Which framework should we use?",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"options": ["React", "Vue", "Angular"]
},
{
"id": "requirements",
"text": "Any additional requirements?",
"type": "free_form"
}
])| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| questions | Yes | ||
| title | No | Human Input Requested |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and does an excellent job. It discloses key behavioral traits: that it launches a GUI process (blocking/non-blocking behavior implied by 'waits'), includes automatic 'Other...' option functionality, describes three possible return states (success, cancel, error), and explains handling of unanswered questions. This goes well beyond what a basic description would provide.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is well-structured with clear sections (purpose, args, returns, notes, examples) and front-loads the core functionality. While comprehensive, some sentences could be more concise (e.g., the notes section has some redundancy). Overall, most content earns its place by providing essential information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's complexity (interactive GUI, multiple question types, structured responses) and complete lack of annotations and output schema, the description provides excellent completeness. It covers purpose, parameters, return values, behavioral notes, and examples - everything needed to understand and use this tool effectively.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by providing detailed parameter documentation. It explains the 'questions' parameter structure including required fields (text, type), optional fields (options, id), valid type values, and the automatic 'Other...' behavior. It also documents the 'title' parameter default value. This adds substantial meaning beyond the bare schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose with specific verbs ('launches a separate GUI process', 'shows a quiz', 'waits for user to respond') and resources ('quiz with one or more questions'). It distinguishes itself by being the only interactive user-input tool in this context, as there are no sibling tools mentioned.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use this tool ('Perfect for clarifying requirements, getting decisions, or extracting implicit knowledge from users') and includes usage notes about preferring multiple choice with 'Other...' options. However, it doesn't explicitly state when NOT to use it or mention alternatives since there are no sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v1.0.0- First observed
implore
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools. The tool 'implore' has a single, clearly defined purpose: launching a GUI quiz for user input.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'implore' is a clear verb that accurately describes its function of requesting human input.
A single tool is too few for a server's purpose, as it limits functionality and forces all interactions through one interface. This makes the server feel thin and underdeveloped, lacking the depth needed for robust agent workflows.
The tool covers its specific domain of user input collection well, but the server's overall scope is unclear. As a standalone tool, it lacks related operations (e.g., managing saved responses or batch processing), leaving gaps in a broader human-in-the-loop workflow.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Create AI surveys with dynamic follow-up probing directly from your AI assistant.
Human-input bridge for AI agents with voice-first answer links, MCP tools, and HTTP APIs.
Human-in-the-loop for AI agents. Submit choices, get a human decision.
Get a real human to verify, decide, or improve an AI agent's work.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to request human input through a web interface during execution. Supports single questions, multiple choice selections, hypothesis challenges, and decision workflows for human-in-the-loop interactions.22MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides an interactive user interface for asking questions with support for text inputs, single/multi-select options, and confirmation dialogs. It allows LLMs to gather structured input or feedback from users through a set of predefined input types.2-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with humans through GUI dialogs for text input, choices, confirmations, and information display.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude to interact with humans through intuitive GUI dialogs, supporting text input, choices, confirmations, and information displays.6163MIT
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kerodkibatu/implore-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server