project-notes MCP Server
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@project-notes MCP ServerAdd a note: auth module was refactored to use JWT"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
project-notes MCP Server
A custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) server written in TypeScript. It lets AI clients store, search, and summarize short notes about a codebase during a coding session.
Overview
This server exposes project notes through MCP tools (for actions) and a resource (for read-only context). It uses stdio transport, which makes it compatible with local AI clients like Cursor and Claude Desktop.
Notes are kept in memory for the lifetime of the server process. They are useful as a session scratchpad, not as permanent project documentation.
Related MCP server: Memory MCP
Features
Capability | Type | Description |
| Tool | Add a note with a title and content |
| Tool | Search notes by keyword in title or content |
| Resource | Return note count and a list of all note titles |
Tech Stack
Runtime: Node.js (ESM)
Language: TypeScript
MCP SDK:
@modelcontextprotocol/sdkValidation: Zod (auto-generates JSON Schema for tool inputs)
Transport: stdio
Project Structure
mcp1/
├── src/
│ └── index.ts # Server entry point
├── dist/
│ └── index.js # Compiled output
├── .cursor/
│ └── mcp.json # Cursor MCP configuration
├── package.json
├── tsconfig.json
└── README.mdRequirements
Node.js 18+
npm
Installation
npm installBuild
npm run buildThis compiles TypeScript from src/ into dist/.
Run
npm startThe server communicates over stdio and waits for MCP client messages. Debug output is written to stderr only — never use console.log, as stdout must remain reserved for JSON-RPC.
On startup you should see:
[project-notes] Server startedClient Configuration
Cursor
Add or update .cursor/mcp.json in your project root:
{
"mcpServers": {
"project-notes": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/mcp1/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Replace the path with the absolute path to your built dist/index.js. Reload MCP servers in Cursor settings after building.
Claude Desktop
Add to your Claude Desktop config:
Platform | Config path |
macOS |
|
Windows |
|
{
"mcpServers": {
"project-notes": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/mcp1/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop after saving.
Testing
Use the official MCP Inspector for interactive testing:
npm run build
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/index.jsFrom the inspector UI you can:
Call
add_notewithtitleandcontentCall
search_noteswith aqueryRead the
notes://summaryresource
Usage Examples
Once connected to a client, you can ask the AI to:
Add a note: “Add a note: auth module was refactored to use JWT”
Search notes: “Search notes for auth”
List notes: “What project notes do we have?”
Example tool inputs:
{
"title": "Auth refactor",
"content": "JWT tokens now replace session cookies in src/auth/"
}{
"query": "auth"
}Implementation Details
Tools vs Resources
Tools are for actions the model can invoke (
add_note,search_notes).Resources provide context the host can read without a tool call (
notes://summary).
Using a resource for summaries avoids adding extra tools and helps keep the tool list small.
Input Validation
Tool parameters are defined with Zod schemas. The MCP SDK converts these into JSON Schema so clients know what inputs each tool accepts.
Error Handling
The add_note tool wraps logic in a try/catch and returns isError: true on failure. This tells the model the call failed instead of treating the response as a successful result.
Response Format
All tool handlers return MCP content blocks:
{
content: [{ type: "text", text: "..." }]
}In-Memory Storage
Notes are stored in a simple array inside the running process:
const notes: { title: string; content: string; ts: string }[] = [];Notes are cleared when the server process restarts or the MCP client reloads the server.
Scripts
Command | Description |
| Compile TypeScript to |
| Run the compiled server |
| Build and run in one step |
License
MIT
Available Tools
2 toolsadd_noteC
Add a note about the project
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | ||
| content | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only says 'Add a note' without disclosing whether this creates a new note, requires authentication, is idempotent, or returns anything. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. However, it is under-specified, missing critical details, so it is concise but not effectively informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple, but the description does not explain parameter semantics, return behavior (no output schema), or any preconditions. Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description should provide more context and fails to.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain what 'title' or 'content' mean or how they relate to the project. The parameter names are generic and provide no additional semantics.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Add a note') and the resource ('note about the project'). While it doesn't explicitly contrast with the sibling tool 'search_notes', the verb 'add' versus 'search' provides implicit differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusions, and no context is provided for the project. The description only states the action without explaining scenarios or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_notesC
Search notes by keyword
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Search notes by keyword' implies a read operation but does not state whether it is read-only, case‑sensitive, or returns partial matches. There is no information about pagination, ordering, or access restrictions, which is a significant gap for a search tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front‑loaded sentence with no fluff. It is appropriately concise for a simple search tool. If anything, it is under‑specified rather than verbose, but it earns its place by clearly identifying the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given there is no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what the tool returns and any relevant behavior. 'Search notes by keyword' does not mention the format of results, error conditions, or any filtering capabilities. For a simple tool it is still incomplete, leaving the agent to guess at the tool's behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has zero description coverage for the 'query' parameter. The description adds the word 'keyword' but that is largely synonymous with 'query'. It does not clarify whether the search is substring, full‑text, exact match, or case‑insensitive. For a single required parameter, more detail was needed to compensate for the missing schema description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Search' with a resource 'notes' and a modifier 'by keyword', clearly distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'add_note' which creates notes. However, it lacks additional context about scope or behavior, making it clear but not exceptionally rich.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention the sibling tool 'add_note' or any exclusions. It merely states what it does, implying usage without explicit direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
add_note - First observed
search_notes
TDQS
The two tools are clearly distinct: one creates notes, the other searches them. There is no ambiguity in their purposes.
Both tools follow a verb_noun pattern, but one uses singular 'note' and the other plural 'notes', creating a minor inconsistency. The pattern is otherwise predictable and readable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a project-notes domain. The count matches the minimal add/search functionality, but it borders on insufficient for a well-scoped tool set.
The domain is note management, but the surface only supports adding and searching. Missing core operations like getting a specific note, updating, deleting, or listing all notes creates significant gaps that will force agents to work around missing functionality.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Shared memory for coding agents. Stop re-explaining your codebase every session.
Persistent memory for AI agents. Search and store durable facts, preferences and decisions.
- TaprootOAuthcom.taproothq
Persistent memory layer for AI tools. Save and recall notes across Claude and other MCP clients.
Persistent cloud memory for AI agents. Store and search key-value memories across sessions.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides long-term memory for AI coding agents, enabling them to remember, search, and organize information across sessions and platforms like Claude Code, ChatGPT, and Cursor.189MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceGives AI coding agents persistent, evolving knowledge about a codebase, enabling them to store and retrieve observations about architecture, conventions, gotchas, and recent work context.10392MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to index, search, and retrieve architectural documentation and store self-learning notes from codebases.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides persistent, searchable memory for MCP-compatible AI coding tools, allowing notes added from one tool to be retrieved from another.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jupiter-ai0211/sample-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server