fluent-mcp-server
Provides tools for navigating ANSYS Fluent documentation, including searching help, listing topics, and retrieving direct links to manuals and sections.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@fluent-mcp-serverFind documentation for the flamelet model in ANSYS Fluent."
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
ANSYS Fluent MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that helps AI assistants navigate ANSYS Fluent online documentation efficiently.
Features
Smart URL Navigator - Find relevant ANSYS Help documentation URLs instantly
35+ Topic Routes - Pre-mapped paths to common Fluent topics
Always Up-to-Date - Points to official ANSYS documentation
Zero Maintenance - No static content to update
Lightweight - Fast URL generation, no heavy indexing
Related MCP server: ANSYS MCP Server
Quick Start
Prerequisites
Python 3.10 or higher
uv package manager
Installation
Choose your MCP client below for setup instructions:
claude mcp add fluent -- uvx fluent-mcp-serverVerify:
claude mcp list
claude mcp info fluentAdd to your Claude Desktop config file:
macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json
Linux: ~/.config/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"fluent": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["fluent-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop completely after saving.
Go to Cursor Settings → MCP → Add new MCP Server:
Name:
fluentCommand:
uvx fluent-mcp-server
Or edit config file:
macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Cursor/mcp_config.json
Windows: %APPDATA%\Cursor\mcp_config.json
Linux: ~/.config/Cursor/mcp_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"fluent": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["fluent-mcp-server"]
}
}
}CLI:
code --add-mcp '{"name":"fluent","command":"uvx","args":["fluent-mcp-server"]}'Or add to VS Code settings:
{
"github.copilot.chat.mcp.servers": {
"fluent": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["fluent-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Install Cline extension, then add to VS Code settings:
{
"cline.mcpServers": {
"fluent": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["fluent-mcp-server"]
}
}
}Reload VS Code window after saving.
For 11 additional clients (Windsurf, Continue, Amp, Codex, Gemini CLI, Goose, Kiro, LM Studio, opencode, Qodo Gen, Warp), see Complete Setup Guide →
Local Development
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/your-org/fluent-mcp-server.git
cd fluent-mcp-server
# Install with uv
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# Run tests
uv run pytest
# Run server
uv run fluent-mcp-serverDevelopment configuration (.mcp.json in project root):
{
"mcpServers": {
"fluent": {
"command": "uv",
"args": [
"--directory",
"/absolute/path/to/fluent-mcp-server",
"run",
"fluent-mcp-server"
]
}
}
}Available Tools
search_help
Find ANSYS Fluent documentation URLs for your query. Returns search URLs and suggested manual sections.
Parameters:
query(required): Search term (e.g., "flamelet model", "read case", "turbulence")max_suggestions(optional): Maximum manual section suggestions (default: 3)
Returns:
ANSYS Help search URL
Suggested manual sections (if topic is pre-mapped)
Links to all major manuals
Example:
search_help("flamelet model")
# Returns:
# - Search URL: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/search?q=flamelet+model
# - Suggested: flamelet User Guide + Theory Guide
# - All manuals: User Guide, TUI, Theory, UDF
search_help("read case")
# Returns URLs to file/read-case TUI documentationlist_topics
List the 35+ topics with pre-mapped documentation routes.
Returns: List of topics like: file, turbulence, combustion, flamelet, mesh, boundary, udf, etc.
Example:
list_topics()get_manual_link
Get direct link to a specific Fluent manual or section.
Parameters:
manual(required): Manual name (user_guide,tui,theory,udf)section(optional): Section path (e.g., "turbulence", "file/read-case")
Example:
get_manual_link("udf", "introduction")
# Returns: https://ansyshelp.ansys.com/.../flu_udf/introduction.htmlUsage Examples
In Claude Code / AI Assistant
You: How do I use the flamelet model in Fluent?
Claude: [Calls search_help("flamelet model")]
[Receives URLs to flamelet documentation]
[Uses WebFetch to read the actual documentation]
[Provides answer based on official ANSYS docs]
You: Show me the command to read a case file
Claude: [Calls search_help("read case")]
[Gets URL to file/read-case TUI command]
[Retrieves documentation and shows syntax]Architecture Flow
User Query → MCP search_help → Returns URLs →
LLM uses WebFetch → Reads official docs → Answers userThe MCP server acts as a smart navigator, not a content database.
Architecture
fluent-mcp-server/
├── src/fluent_mcp_server/
│ ├── server.py # FastMCP server & tool definitions
│ ├── doc_finder.py # Smart URL router (35+ topic mappings)
│ └── __init__.py
├── md-files/
│ ├── ARCHITECTURE.md # Technical architecture
│ └── ...
├── tests/ # Unit tests
├── examples/ # Usage examples
└── pyproject.toml # Project configurationRoadmap
Phase 1.x: Route Expansion (Future)
Add more topic routes based on usage patterns
Version selection (v251, v252, v253)
Usage analytics to identify popular topics
Phase 2: PyFluent Integration (Planned)
Connect to Fluent sessions
Execute TUI commands programmatically
Case I/O via PyFluent API
Mesh quality automation
Convergence monitoring
Phase 3: Workflow Automation (Planned)
Boundary condition templates
Solver configuration wizards
Post-processing automation
Parametric studies
See md-files/ARCHITECTURE.md for detailed roadmap.
Documentation
Getting Started:
md-files/QUICKSTART.md- Setup and usage guideREADME.md- This file (overview)
Technical Documentation:
md-files/ARCHITECTURE.md- System architecture and designmd-files/TOOLS.md- Complete tool catalogmd-files/ANSYS_HELP_GUIDE.md- ANSYS Help site patterns
Validation & Analysis:
md-files/REDDIT_REAL_WORLD_EXAMPLES.md- Real user questionsmd-files/GAP_ANALYSIS.md- Coverage analysismd-files/USERSTORY.md- User scenarios
Development:
License
MIT License
Contributing
Contributions welcome! Please ensure:
Tests pass:
uv run pytestCode follows existing style
Documentation updated
fluent-mcp-server
Available Tools
3 toolsget_manual_linkA
Get direct link to a specific Fluent manual or section.
Args: manual: Manual name (user_guide, tui, theory, udf) section: Optional section path (e.g., "turbulence", "file/read-case")
Returns: Direct URL to the manual or section
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| manual | Yes | ||
| section | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description clearly states the input parameters and the return value (direct URL). For a read-only tool with no annotations, it adequately covers behavior. No side effects or additional traits disclosed, but sufficient for the simple operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise: a single sentence summarizing purpose followed by clearly structured Args and Returns sections. All information is relevant and efficiently presented.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the essential aspects: purpose, parameters with examples, and return type. Given the tool's simplicity and existing output schema, it is complete enough. Minor gap: no mention of behavior for invalid manual names.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description provides essential semantics: it lists valid manual names (user_guide, tui, theory, udf) and gives examples for section paths. This fully compensates for the bare schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: retrieving a direct link to a specific manual or section. It lists valid manual names and the optional section path, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_topics and search_help.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for getting a direct URL, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings or exclude other cases. No when-not or alternatives are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_topicsA
List common Fluent topics with quick documentation links.
Returns: List of pre-mapped topics for faster navigation
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It mentions the tool returns a list of pre-mapped topics with links, but does not disclose any limitations, ordering, or whether the list is static/dynamic. Adequate but lacks depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise with two short sentences plus a returns line. Front-loaded with the verb 'List' and no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and an output schema (as per context), the description adequately covers the purpose. However, it could be slightly improved by clarifying what 'common' or 'pre-mapped' means in this context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable as there is nothing to document.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it lists common Fluent topics with documentation links, using a specific verb and resource. It is distinguishable from siblings 'get_manual_link' and 'search_help' which serve different purposes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings or other alternatives. The description does not include any when-to-use or when-not-to-use context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search_helpA
Find ANSYS Fluent documentation URLs for your query.
This tool helps you navigate to the right online documentation. Use WebFetch to retrieve the actual content from the returned URLs.
Args: query: Search term (e.g., "flamelet model", "read case", "turbulence") max_suggestions: Maximum manual section suggestions to return (default: 3)
Returns: URLs and navigation hints for finding the documentation
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| max_suggestions | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Describes what the tool returns (URLs and navigation hints) and what is not done (actual content retrieval). No hidden behaviors are implied. Since annotations are absent, the description carries the burden and does well.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Concise, front-loaded description with no unnecessary words. Clear separation of purpose, usage, and parameter details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Provides enough context for an agent to understand the tool's role, including the need for WebFetch and the nature of the return. Output schema is not shown but mentioned in description; completeness is adequate for a search tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Adds examples for the 'query' parameter and explains the purpose of 'max_suggestions' with default value. Though schema coverage is 0%, the description compensates by providing practical guidance beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it finds ANSYS Fluent documentation URLs. Example queries and the specific parameter descriptions reinforce the purpose. Differentiates from siblings by being a search tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Advises using WebFetch to retrieve content from URLs, which is a useful follow-up step. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over siblings like get_manual_link or list_topics.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
3 tool updates
v0.2.0- First observed
get_manual_link - First observed
list_topics - First observed
search_help
TDQS
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: get_manual_link fetches a direct link to a specific manual section, list_topics provides pre-mapped common topics, and search_help performs general searches. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_manual_link, list_topics, search_help. The naming is predictable and readable.
With 3 tools, the set is compact but covers the essential operations for Fluent documentation access: direct linking, topic listing, and search. This count is appropriate for a focused server, though slightly lower than typical ranges.
The tools cover the main use cases for finding documentation: specific manual links, common topics, and free-text search. Minor gaps like browsing by category or full table of contents are acceptable for the scope.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Search and query nTop's knowledge base and engineering guides from AI applications.
Create short links, QR codes, UTM templates, vCards, and landing pages from your AI assistant.
Search NVIDIA CUDA documentation and code samples from AI coding agents.
Free URL shortener: manage short links, QR codes and click analytics from AI clients.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language search of ANSA Python API documentation, allowing AI to find relevant functions, signatures, and code examples for writing ANSA scripts.116MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language-driven ANSYS simulations (Fluent, Mechanical, Geometry) with automatic TUI script generation for reproducibility.416MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Ansys simulation software (Fluent, MAPDL, Mechanical, Geometry) through the Model Context Protocol.55MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with ANSYS Icepak through natural language commands, supporting geometry import, material assignment, thermal loads, meshing, solving, and result retrieval.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jiweiqi/fluent-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server