Get website

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds behavioral value by clarifying that the tool returns an edit link, not website content or management actions, and that editing is only possible in the Hostinger Horizons interface.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the core purpose. The only minor redundancy is repeating 'Hostinger Horizons interface' and the concept of editing, but overall every sentence contributes meaningful guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter, read-only tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description is complete. It explains what the tool returns, when to use it, and the critical limitation that editing must happen in the Hostinger Horizons interface.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents websiteId with 100% coverage. The description does not add parameter-level detail, but it provides useful context about what the returned link is for. With full schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it 'gets a link' for editing a website in the Hostinger Horizons interface. This clearly differentiates the tool from other website-related tools like hosting_getWebsiteDetailsV1 or agency-hosting_getWebsiteDetailsV1, which return details rather than an edit link.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use the tool: when the user wants to modify, edit, or add features to an existing website. It does not mention when not to use it or name alternative tools, but the usage context is clear enough for an agent to route correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.