exyu-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@exyu-mcpWho said 'Vazduh gori ko da…'?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
exyu-mcp
An MCP server that gives AI agents (Claude, ChatGPT, and others) the ex-Yugoslav cultural context they're currently missing.
The problem
LLMs are fluent in ex-YU languages but culturally thin. They know the five most-famous lines of a cult film, not the 200th-most-quoted one, the exact wording, or who actually said it. The exact quote, the correct attribution, the slang meaning, the modern usage — that long tail is missing or hallucinated. This repo builds the layer that fills it: a factual, citable, safe-by-construction cultural-reference database exposed as an MCP server, so any connected agent (Claude, ChatGPT, others) can look it up instead of guessing.
Related MCP server: BENZEMA's Personal Knowledge Card
Scope
This repo is deliberately narrow: cultural reference resolution only —
quotes, attribution, timestamps, slang meaning, cultural weight. Safe,
factual, sourced. Full design in brainstorming/.
We don't try to convince or configure the host platforms — we build the data and the MCP, ship it, and let each platform decide whether to use it. The lever we control is trust: transparent sourcing and per-field provenance, not permission-seeking.
Explicitly out of scope here: shaping how a model talks — tone, directness, swearing as normal register rather than something to sanitize. That's a different kind of problem (what a model is willing to say, not what it knows) and needs a different delivery mechanism than an MCP tool call to someone else's chat app. Planned as a separate future project — a skills/harness layer for a custom chat app or direct API use, potentially reusing this repo's MCP/data. Not started; revisit once this repo's MVP is live.
Current-phase decisions
Copyright/licensing: deferred. We go bold on short-quote usage for now and treat it as a solved problem — there's no way around ingesting copyrighted subtitles/lyrics for the payload this project needs, and stalling on it blocks everything else. The full risk/tier analysis is kept in
brainstorming/09-risks-and-licensing.mdfor when this needs a real answer (before any wide/public distribution) — it's deferred, not forgotten.
Status
Working MVP, not yet through live acceptance. The Phases 0–2 build from the design spec is implemented and green in CI:
TypeScript MCP server exposing
resolve_referenceover Streamable-HTTP (src/server/http.ts) and an npx stdio twin (bin/exyu-mcp.ts).Postgres +
pgvector/pg_trgm/tsvectorstorage, with a trigram → FTS → vector cascade and fully-cited results (work, speaker, timestamps, countersign, meaning, modern usage, per-field provenance).YAML records validated against a locked JSON Schema, ingested into Postgres transactionally and idempotently.
Docker Compose deployment behind Caddy (TLS + rate limiting), with push-to-
mainCI/CD to a Hetzner box.
Not done yet: the live vertical-slice acceptance test — the Valter record is
still a stub with ⚠ TO-VERIFY fields (countersign, speaker, timestamps) that
need real subtitle data, and the 06-plan.md acceptance test (type
"Vazduh gori ko da…" into a real Claude/ChatGPT chat and get the resolved
record back) has not been run against a live deploy.
Full design: docs/superpowers/specs/ and
docs/superpowers/plans/; original design notes in
brainstorming/.
Quickstart
cp .env.example .env # then fill in the values below
npm ci
docker compose up -d db # or `docker compose up -d --build` for the full stack
npm run build # required: `npm run migrate` runs the compiled output
npm run migrate # apply db/migrations/
npm run validate # schema-check every records/**/*.yaml
npm run ingest -- records/film/ref_valter_vazduh_trepti.yaml
npm run dev # http://localhost:8787/mcp (or `npm start` after build)Other scripts: npm test (vitest; the DB-backed tests need Docker for
testcontainers), npm run migrate:dev (migrate via tsx, no build needed).
Environment variables
Variable | Required | Notes |
| yes | e.g. |
| no | HTTP transport port, default |
| ingest only |
|
| ingest only | key for the selected |
| yes |
|
| yes | credential for the selected |
| no | only for |
| production | public hostname Caddy terminates TLS for; falls back to |
The
refs.embeddingcolumn isvector(1536), matching the default OpenAItext-embedding-3-smallmodel. SwitchingEMBEDDING_PROVIDERto a different-dimension model (voyage-3 is 1024) requires altering that column; ingest and resolve both fail with an explicit dimension-mismatch error otherwise.
Available Tools
1 toolresolve_referenceARead-onlyIdempotent
Call this for ANY ex-YU film quote, song lyric, slang term, or meme reference — including partial, misremembered, or colloquial phrasings. The model's internal knowledge of ex-YU culture is unreliable for exact wording, attribution, and modern usage; do not answer from memory without calling this tool first.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | The quote, lyric, slang term, or meme phrase to resolve. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, so the safety profile is known. The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations: it states that the tool accepts partial, misremembered, or colloquial phrasings, and that the model's internal knowledge is unreliable, which explains the tool's necessity. No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description consists of two sentences, both essential. The first sentence is front-loaded with the action ('Call this') and the exact scope, while the second sentence reinforces the need and urgency. There is no redundant information or unnecessary elaboration.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple single-parameter read-only tool, the description covers the key aspects: what it does, when to use it, and why it is needed. It omits details about the return format or error behavior, but with strong annotations and a clear purpose, the description is sufficiently complete for the agent to act correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema describes the 'query' parameter as 'The quote, lyric, slang term, or meme phrase to resolve' with 100% coverage. The description further enriches the parameter semantics by clarifying that partial, misremembered, or colloquial phrasings are acceptable inputs, giving the agent a better understanding of the expected input format.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'resolve' and clearly identifies the resource: ex-YU film quotes, song lyrics, slang terms, and memes. It even notes the comprehensive scope ('ANY') and explicitly differentiates this tool as the required handler for these reference types, making its purpose unmistakable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Call this for ANY ex-YU film quote...' and even instructs the agent not to answer from memory without invoking it. It also explains why the tool is necessary (model's internal knowledge is unreliable), giving clear context and no ambiguity about when to invoke it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
v0.1.0- First observed
resolve_reference
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct.
The single tool name follows a verb_noun structure (resolve_reference), which is clear and consistent. With only one tool, there are no inconsistencies.
One tool is on the low end, but the server's scope is extremely narrow (ex-YU cultural reference resolution), making a single-tool design appropriate. It is slightly under the typical 3-15 range but not a deficiency.
The tool comprehensively covers the domain of ex-YU references, including quotes, lyrics, slang, and memes, with no obvious missing operations for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
- UnifAPIOAuthcom.unifapi
Hosted MCP server for live public-data APIs and Skills for AI agents.
- MysocialOAuthio.mysocial
Social media MCP server: your Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn and Threads history for your AI.
1 MCP server for AI dialogue using various LLM models via AceDataCloud
Cloud-hosted MCP server for durable AI memory
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server giving AI agents persistent memory for personalization and context across conversations.277Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server provides LLMs with a live, curated knowledge base of AI agent research, world models, and source-code reviews, enabling personalized and context-aware responses. Users can either connect to the hosted knowledge or build and host their own vault.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA local MCP server that gives AI coding agents persistent memory and context across sessions.13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents cited, review-gated grounding in EU regulation.5MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/easingthemes/exyu-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server