get_pipeline_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses that the output is automatically stored in the object store and returns an object ID for referencing. It explains how to use the result with object store tools. However, it omits authentication needs, rate limits, or side effects, though the operation is likely read-only.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is informative with a clear purpose, parameter docs, and output usage notes. It is slightly lengthy due to repeating param docs that could be in the schema, but overall front-loaded with the main action. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple fetch tool with no output schema, the description explains the return format (object ID) and how to use it. It covers the basic workflow but lacks details on error handling or prerequisites. Given the tool's simplicity, it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, but the description includes explicit parameter documentation: ':param pipeline_name: Name of the pipeline.' and ':param version_id: UUID of the version to fetch.' This adds crucial meaning beyond the schema's property titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches a specific pipeline version by ID, using the verb 'fetches' and specific resource 'version'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_pipeline_versions' (which lists all versions) and 'patch_pipeline_version' (which modifies).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (fetching a specific version) but does not explicitly guide when to use this vs. alternatives like 'list_pipeline_versions' for multiple versions or 'get_pipeline' for the pipeline itself. It mentions using object store tools for nested properties, which helps for further interaction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.