Skip to main content
Glama

twining_record

Record session actions, decisions, and discoveries to make them visible to future agents as status posts, tracked decisions, and blackboard entries.

Instructions

Record what you did, any choices you made, and anything you discovered. Call before committing or ending a session. The summary becomes a status post. Decisions become tracked records with rationale. Findings become blackboard entries visible to future agents. Scope is auto-inferred from git diff if omitted.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
scopeNoArea of codebase affected. Auto-inferred from git diff if omitted.
summaryYesWhat you did this session — one or two sentences. Kept to 200 characters — longer text is truncated with the full text preserved in the entry detail. Lead with the most important information: similarity search weighs the opening of the text most heavily.
agent_idNoAgent identifier (default: main)
findingsNoDiscoveries, warnings, needs, and surprises — anything the next session would want to know that is not visible from the diff: odd patterns you noticed, fragile spots, dead ends you ruled out, things that did not work as expected. Prefix with "warning:" or "need:" for severity. E.g. ["Auth tokens stored in localStorage — fails SOC2", "warning: No token rotation exists", "need: Add rate limiting before launch"]. A substantial change with zero findings is usually under-recording, not a clean run. Lead each finding with the most important information — the first ~200 characters carry the most weight in similarity search.
resolvesNoBlackboard entry IDs (needs/questions/warnings from twining_assemble or twining_triage) that this session's work handled — they are marked resolved and leave the open lane, and the status post back-references them
decisionsNoChoices you made. Each item is either a natural-language sentence ("Chose X over Y — reason") or a structured object ({ summary, rationale, alternatives: [{ option, reason_rejected }] }) when the content is too long or too structured for the NL parser to split cleanly.
depends_onNoIDs of prior decisions that your decisions depend on (from twining_assemble or twining_why output)
reversibleNoWhether your decisions are easily reversible (default: true)
supersedesNoID of a prior decision that your work replaces or invalidates. Requires exactly ONE decision in this call — with multiple decisions the superseding record is ambiguous, so the supersession is SKIPPED and reported (supersedes_skipped). A target id that does not exist is also reported (supersedes_dangling), not silently ignored.
assumptionsNoConditions your decisions depend on. E.g. ["Data is relational", "No strict ordering required"]
commit_hashNoGit commit hash to associate with these decisions
constraintsNoWhat limited your options. E.g. ["Must support Node 18+", "Cannot add new dependencies"]
affected_filesNoFile paths you changed or that are affected by your decisions
affected_symbolsNoFunction/class/method names affected by your decisions

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.16.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / decisions / items / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": false,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "affected_files": {
      -        "description": "File paths THIS decision governs (overrides the session-level affected_files for this decision; falls back to it when omitted). Enables scope-based retrieval via twining_why and the drift check.",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "affected_symbols": {
      -        "description": "Function/class/method names THIS decision governs (overrides the session-level affected_symbols for this decision; falls back to it when omitted)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "alternatives": {
      -        "description": "Alternatives that were considered and rejected",
      -        "items": {
      -          "additionalProperties": false,
      -          "properties": {
      -            "cons": {
      -              "items": {
      -                "type": "string"
      -              },
      -              "type": "array"
      -            },
      -            "option": {
      -              "type": "string"
      -            },
      -            "pros": {
      -              "items": {
      -                "type": "string"
      -              },
      -              "type": "array"
      -            },
      -            "reason_rejected": {
      -              "type": "string"
      -            }
      -          },
      -          "required": [
      -            "option",
      -            "reason_rejected"
      -          ],
      -          "type": "object"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "assumptions": {
      -        "description": "Assumptions this decision depends on (overrides the session-level assumptions for this decision)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "confidence": {
      -        "description": "Confidence level (default: \"medium\")",
      -        "enum": [
      -          "high",
      -          "medium",
      -          "low"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "constraints": {
      -        "description": "What limited the options (overrides the session-level constraints for this decision)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "context": {
      -        "description": "Situation that prompted this decision (falls back to the session summary)",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "domain": {
      -        "description": "Decision domain (e.g., \"architecture\", \"implementation\"). Inferred from content when omitted.",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "rationale": {
      -        "description": "Reasoning for the choice. Skips the NL parser when provided.",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "status": {
      -        "description": "Initial lifecycle status for THIS decision (default: \"active\"). \"provisional\" records it as awaiting ratification — it sits in the triage open lane until confirmed (twining_promote) or vetoed (twining_override). Requires tools.full_surface: true (the drain tools are full-surface). Cannot be combined with supersedes — the target would be retired before ratification. WARNING: twining_housekeeping with promote_provisionals + execute bulk-promotes provisionals older than 7 days with NO per-item review; leave that flag off if provisional is serving as your ratification queue.",
      -        "enum": [
      -          "active",
      -          "provisional"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "summary": {
      -        "description": "One-line decision statement",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "required": [
      -      "summary"
      -    ],
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "affected_files": {
      +        "description": "File paths THIS decision governs (overrides the session-level affected_files for this decision; falls back to it when omitted). Enables scope-based retrieval via twining_why and the drift check.",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "affected_symbols": {
      +        "description": "Function/class/method names THIS decision governs (overrides the session-level affected_symbols for this decision; falls back to it when omitted)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "alternatives": {
      +        "description": "Alternatives that were considered and rejected",
      +        "items": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "cons": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "option": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "pros": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "reason_rejected": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "option"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "assumptions": {
      +        "description": "Assumptions this decision depends on (overrides the session-level assumptions for this decision)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "confidence": {
      +        "description": "Confidence level (default: \"medium\")",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "high",
      +          "medium",
      +          "low"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "constraints": {
      +        "description": "What limited the options (overrides the session-level constraints for this decision)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "context": {
      +        "description": "Situation that prompted this decision (falls back to the session summary)",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "domain": {
      +        "description": "Decision domain (e.g., \"architecture\", \"implementation\"). Inferred from content when omitted.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "rationale": {
      +        "description": "Reasoning for the choice. Skips the NL parser when provided.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "status": {
      +        "description": "Initial lifecycle status for THIS decision (default: \"active\"). \"provisional\" records it as awaiting ratification — it sits in the triage open lane until confirmed (twining_promote) or vetoed (twining_override). Requires tools.full_surface: true (the drain tools are full-surface). Cannot be combined with supersedes — the target would be retired before ratification. WARNING: twining_housekeeping with promote_provisionals + execute bulk-promotes provisionals older than 7 days with NO per-item review; leave that flag off if provisional is serving as your ratification queue.",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "active",
      +          "provisional"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "summary": {
      +        "description": "One-line decision statement",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "summary"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv2.12.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / decisions / items / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": false,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "alternatives": {
      -        "description": "Alternatives that were considered and rejected",
      -        "items": {
      -          "additionalProperties": false,
      -          "properties": {
      -            "cons": {
      -              "items": {
      -                "type": "string"
      -              },
      -              "type": "array"
      -            },
      -            "option": {
      -              "type": "string"
      -            },
      -            "pros": {
      -              "items": {
      -                "type": "string"
      -              },
      -              "type": "array"
      -            },
      -            "reason_rejected": {
      -              "type": "string"
      -            }
      -          },
      -          "required": [
      -            "option",
      -            "reason_rejected"
      -          ],
      -          "type": "object"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "assumptions": {
      -        "description": "Assumptions this decision depends on (overrides the session-level assumptions for this decision)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "confidence": {
      -        "description": "Confidence level (default: \"medium\")",
      -        "enum": [
      -          "high",
      -          "medium",
      -          "low"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "constraints": {
      -        "description": "What limited the options (overrides the session-level constraints for this decision)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "context": {
      -        "description": "Situation that prompted this decision (falls back to the session summary)",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "domain": {
      -        "description": "Decision domain (e.g., \"architecture\", \"implementation\"). Inferred from content when omitted.",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "rationale": {
      -        "description": "Reasoning for the choice. Skips the NL parser when provided.",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "status": {
      -        "description": "Initial lifecycle status for THIS decision (default: \"active\"). \"provisional\" records it as awaiting ratification — it sits in the triage open lane until confirmed (twining_promote) or vetoed (twining_override). Requires tools.full_surface: true (the drain tools are full-surface). Cannot be combined with supersedes — the target would be retired before ratification. WARNING: twining_housekeeping with promote_provisionals + execute bulk-promotes provisionals older than 7 days with NO per-item review; leave that flag off if provisional is serving as your ratification queue.",
      -        "enum": [
      -          "active",
      -          "provisional"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "summary": {
      -        "description": "One-line decision statement",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "required": [
      -      "summary"
      -    ],
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "affected_files": {
      +        "description": "File paths THIS decision governs (overrides the session-level affected_files for this decision; falls back to it when omitted). Enables scope-based retrieval via twining_why and the drift check.",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "affected_symbols": {
      +        "description": "Function/class/method names THIS decision governs (overrides the session-level affected_symbols for this decision; falls back to it when omitted)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "alternatives": {
      +        "description": "Alternatives that were considered and rejected",
      +        "items": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "cons": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "option": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "pros": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "reason_rejected": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "option",
      +            "reason_rejected"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "assumptions": {
      +        "description": "Assumptions this decision depends on (overrides the session-level assumptions for this decision)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "confidence": {
      +        "description": "Confidence level (default: \"medium\")",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "high",
      +          "medium",
      +          "low"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "constraints": {
      +        "description": "What limited the options (overrides the session-level constraints for this decision)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "context": {
      +        "description": "Situation that prompted this decision (falls back to the session summary)",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "domain": {
      +        "description": "Decision domain (e.g., \"architecture\", \"implementation\"). Inferred from content when omitted.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "rationale": {
      +        "description": "Reasoning for the choice. Skips the NL parser when provided.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "status": {
      +        "description": "Initial lifecycle status for THIS decision (default: \"active\"). \"provisional\" records it as awaiting ratification — it sits in the triage open lane until confirmed (twining_promote) or vetoed (twining_override). Requires tools.full_surface: true (the drain tools are full-surface). Cannot be combined with supersedes — the target would be retired before ratification. WARNING: twining_housekeeping with promote_provisionals + execute bulk-promotes provisionals older than 7 days with NO per-item review; leave that flag off if provisional is serving as your ratification queue.",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "active",
      +          "provisional"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "summary": {
      +        "description": "One-line decision statement",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "summary"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / resolves
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Blackboard entry IDs (needs/questions/warnings from twining_assemble or twining_triage) that this session's work handled — they are marked resolved and leave the open lane, and the status post back-references them",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / supersedes / description
      Previous value: -"ID of a prior decision that your work replaces or invalidates"New value: +"ID of a prior decision that your work replaces or invalidates. Requires exactly ONE decision in this call — with multiple decisions the superseding record is ambiguous, so the supersession is SKIPPED and reported (supersedes_skipped). A target id that does not exist is also reported (supersedes_dangling), not silently ignored."
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv2.5.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / decisions / items / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": false,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "alternatives": {
      -        "description": "Alternatives that were considered and rejected",
      -        "items": {
      -          "additionalProperties": false,
      -          "properties": {
      -            "cons": {
      -              "items": {
      -                "type": "string"
      -              },
      -              "type": "array"
      -            },
      -            "option": {
      -              "type": "string"
      -            },
      -            "pros": {
      -              "items": {
      -                "type": "string"
      -              },
      -              "type": "array"
      -            },
      -            "reason_rejected": {
      -              "type": "string"
      -            }
      -          },
      -          "required": [
      -            "option",
      -            "reason_rejected"
      -          ],
      -          "type": "object"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "assumptions": {
      -        "description": "Assumptions this decision depends on (overrides the session-level assumptions for this decision)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "confidence": {
      -        "description": "Confidence level (default: \"medium\")",
      -        "enum": [
      -          "high",
      -          "medium",
      -          "low"
      -        ],
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "constraints": {
      -        "description": "What limited the options (overrides the session-level constraints for this decision)",
      -        "items": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "type": "array"
      -      },
      -      "context": {
      -        "description": "Situation that prompted this decision (falls back to the session summary)",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "domain": {
      -        "description": "Decision domain (e.g., \"architecture\", \"implementation\"). Inferred from content when omitted.",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "rationale": {
      -        "description": "Reasoning for the choice. Skips the NL parser when provided.",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "summary": {
      -        "description": "One-line decision statement",
      -        "type": "string"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "required": [
      -      "summary"
      -    ],
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "alternatives": {
      +        "description": "Alternatives that were considered and rejected",
      +        "items": {
      +          "additionalProperties": false,
      +          "properties": {
      +            "cons": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "option": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "pros": {
      +              "items": {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              "type": "array"
      +            },
      +            "reason_rejected": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            }
      +          },
      +          "required": [
      +            "option",
      +            "reason_rejected"
      +          ],
      +          "type": "object"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "assumptions": {
      +        "description": "Assumptions this decision depends on (overrides the session-level assumptions for this decision)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "confidence": {
      +        "description": "Confidence level (default: \"medium\")",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "high",
      +          "medium",
      +          "low"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "constraints": {
      +        "description": "What limited the options (overrides the session-level constraints for this decision)",
      +        "items": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      "context": {
      +        "description": "Situation that prompted this decision (falls back to the session summary)",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "domain": {
      +        "description": "Decision domain (e.g., \"architecture\", \"implementation\"). Inferred from content when omitted.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "rationale": {
      +        "description": "Reasoning for the choice. Skips the NL parser when provided.",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "status": {
      +        "description": "Initial lifecycle status for THIS decision (default: \"active\"). \"provisional\" records it as awaiting ratification — it sits in the triage open lane until confirmed (twining_promote) or vetoed (twining_override). Requires tools.full_surface: true (the drain tools are full-surface). Cannot be combined with supersedes — the target would be retired before ratification. WARNING: twining_housekeeping with promote_provisionals + execute bulk-promotes provisionals older than 7 days with NO per-item review; leave that flag off if provisional is serving as your ratification queue.",
      +        "enum": [
      +          "active",
      +          "provisional"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "summary": {
      +        "description": "One-line decision statement",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "summary"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  4. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.24.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / findings / description
      Previous value: -"Discoveries, warnings, or needs. Prefix with \"warning:\" or \"need:\" for severity. E.g. [\"Auth tokens stored in localStorage — fails SOC2\", \"warning: No token rotation exists\", \"need: Add rate limiting before launch\"]"New value: +"Discoveries, warnings, needs, and surprises — anything the next session would want to know that is not visible from the diff: odd patterns you noticed, fragile spots, dead ends you ruled out, things that did not work as expected. Prefix with \"warning:\" or \"need:\" for severity. E.g. [\"Auth tokens stored in localStorage — fails SOC2\", \"warning: No token rotation exists\", \"need: Add rate limiting before launch\"]. A substantial change with zero findings is usually under-recording, not a clean run. Lead each finding with the most important information — the first ~200 characters carry the most weight in similarity search."
    • changedInput schema / properties / summary / description
      Previous value: -"What you did this session — one or two sentences"New value: +"What you did this session — one or two sentences. Kept to 200 characters — longer text is truncated with the full text preserved in the entry detail. Lead with the most important information: similarity search weighs the opening of the text most heavily."
  5. Addedv1.20.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full disclosure burden and does so well: it reveals persistent side effects ('summary becomes a status post', 'findings become blackboard entries visible to future agents') and the auto-inference behavior ('Scope is auto-inferred from git diff if omitted'). Supplementary schema text adds truncation and similarity-weighting behavior. It does not explicitly flag that this is a mutating write operation, but the creation language makes that evident.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact — five short sentences that front-load the action, then give timing, then enumerate the three output side effects, then the auto-inference note. No filler or redundant phrasing. It loses one point only because the schema descriptions that follow are verbose, though that is schema, not description, territory.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (14 parameters) and the absence of both annotations and an output schema, the description covers the core purpose, timing, and side effects but omits success/return behavior — the agent is not told what comes back on completion (e.g., entry IDs or confirmation). For a workflow tool of this complexity, a note on return or error semantics would round it out, though the main record flow is well established.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema itself documents all 14 parameters richly (truncation rules, warning/need prefixes, decision structure, supersedes constraints). The description adds only 'Scope is auto-inferred from git diff if omitted,' which duplicates the schema's own scope text. Per the rubric, high coverage yields a baseline 3, and the description contributes little unique parameter meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb+resource: 'Record what you did, any choices you made, and anything you discovered.' It then spells out the distinct outputs ('The summary becomes a status post. Decisions become tracked records with rationale. Findings become blackboard entries visible to future agents'), which clearly differentiates this session-logging tool from siblings like twining_post, twining_status, and twining_assemble.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit timing guidance ('Call before committing or ending a session') that tells the agent when to invoke this tool. It does not name sibling alternatives or state exclusions, but the workflow role is clear enough that an agent can infer when twining_record applies versus querying (twining_why, twining_graph_query) or maintenance (twining_housekeeping) tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/daveangulo/twining-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server