Skip to main content
Glama
csawantgit

commvault-release-comparison-mcp

by csawantgit

Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to compare Commvault release versions and analyze product changes across functional areas.

Problem Statement

Commvault customers and administrators face a significant challenge when planning product upgrades:

  • Fragmented Information: Release details are scattered across multiple documentation pages and release notes

  • Information Overload: Large volumes of release notes make it difficult to identify changes relevant to specific needs

  • Category Blindness: Users struggle to understand how changes impact particular functional areas such as Virtualization, Security, Storage, Databases, and APIs

  • Time-Consuming Analysis: Manual review of multiple versions is labor-intensive and error-prone

This fragmentation increases the time and effort required to make informed decisions about upgrade timing and planning.

Related MCP server: Maven Version Server

Solution Overview

The Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server bridges this gap by providing intelligent tools for exploring and comparing release information. It enables:

  • Quick Comparisons: Compare two release versions side-by-side with categorized change summaries

  • Targeted Queries: Retrieve changes specific to functional areas of interest

  • Version Analysis: View all changes for a specific release, optionally filtered by category

  • Human-Readable Summaries: Generate formatted release summaries in multiple output formats

  • AI-Powered Integration: Leverage Claude and other AI assistants to answer questions about Commvault releases

By exposing release data through MCP tools, customers can integrate release comparison capabilities directly into their AI workflows, enabling faster, more informed decision-making.

Architecture

Component Overview

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         Claude/AI Assistant                         │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
                 │ MCP Protocol (stdio)
┌────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐
│    Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server        │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                   │
│  ┌─────────────────────┐  ┌──────────────────┐  │
│  │   Tool Router       │  │  Tool Handlers   │  │
│  │                     │  │                  │  │
│  │ - compare_releases  │─▶│ - Compare Logic  │  │
│  │ - get_release_...   │  │ - Query Logic    │  │
│  │ - get_category_...  │  │ - Format Logic   │  │
│  │ - generate_summary  │  │                  │  │
│  └─────────────────────┘  └──────────────────┘  │
│           │                       │              │
│  ┌────────▼────────────────────────▼──────────┐  │
│  │         Release Manager (Singleton)        │  │
│  │  - Coordinates data loading                │  │
│  │  - Manages caching with TTL                │  │
│  │  - Handles multiple data sources           │  │
│  └────────┬─────────────────────────────────┬┘  │
│           │                                 │    │
│  ┌────────▼────────┐  ┌─────────────────┐  │    │
│  │  Release Data   │  │  Cache Manager  │  │    │
│  │  Loader         │  │                 │  │    │
│  │                 │  │  - In-memory    │  │    │
│  │  - Multi-source │  │  - TTL-based    │  │    │
│  │    fallback     │  │  - Expiration   │  │    │
│  │  - Dedup        │  │                 │  │    │
│  │    concurrent   │  └─────────────────┘  │    │
│  │    requests     │                       │    │
│  └──────┬──────────┘                       │    │
│         │                                  │    │
│  ┌──────┴──────────────────────────────────┴──┐ │
│  │  Data Sources (pluggable)                 │ │
│  │                                           │ │
│  │  1. Commvault Documentation Source       │ │
│  │     - Fetches from commvault.com         │ │
│  │     - Supports versions 11.44, 11.46+   │ │
│  │                                           │ │
│  │  2. Mock Data Source (Fallback)          │ │
│  │     - Provides test data                 │ │
│  │     - v11.44, v11.46 included            │ │
│  │                                           │ │
│  │  3. Custom Sources (extensible)          │ │
│  │     - Database, API, File sources        │ │
│  │     - Implement DataSource interface     │ │
│  └───────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│                                                   │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Data Loading Architecture

The system uses a dynamic, multi-source data loading approach:

  1. Initialization: On startup, ReleaseManager loads specified versions

  2. Data Sources: Tries sources in order (Commvault docs → Mock data)

  3. Automatic Fallback: If web source fails, automatically uses mock data

  4. Intelligent Caching: Results cached with TTL to avoid repeated fetches

  5. On-Demand Loading: Versions loaded on first access if not preloaded

See docs/data-loading.md for complete architecture details.

Technology Stack

  • Runtime: Node.js 18+

  • Language: TypeScript 5.0+

  • Protocol: Model Context Protocol (MCP) v1.0.0

  • Build Tool: TypeScript Compiler (tsc)

Project Structure

commvault-release-comparison-mcp/
├── src/
│   ├── index.ts                      # Main MCP server implementation
│   ├── data/
│   │   ├── releases.ts               # Type definitions and exports
│   │   └── releaseManager.ts         # Release data coordinator
│   └── services/
│       ├── types.ts                  # Shared data source interfaces
│       ├── cacheManager.ts           # TTL-based cache implementation
│       ├── releaseDataLoader.ts      # Multi-source loader orchestrator
│       ├── commvaultDocSource.ts     # Fetches from Commvault docs
│       └── mockDataSource.ts         # Fallback test data
├── build/                            # Compiled JavaScript output
├── docs/
│   ├── project-plan.md               # Original project planning
│   ├── data-loading.md               # Data loading architecture (NEW)
│   ├── data-sources-config.md        # Configuration guide (NEW)
│   └── DATA-LOADING-SUMMARY.md       # Implementation summary (NEW)
├── examples/
│   └── test-data-loading.mjs         # Data loading test suite (NEW)
├── package.json                      # Dependencies and metadata
├── tsconfig.json                     # TypeScript configuration
├── README.md                         # This file
└── LICENSE                           # MIT License

Services Overview

Data Loading Services

  • ReleaseManager - Singleton coordinator for all data operations

  • ReleaseDataLoader - Manages multiple data sources with fallback

  • CacheManager - In-memory cache with TTL expiration

Data Sources

  • CommvaultDocSource - Fetches from official Commvault documentation

  • MockDataSource - Provides test data for v11.44 and v11.46

  • Custom Sources - Extensible architecture for custom implementations

MCP Tools

1. compare_releases

Compare two Commvault release versions and view categorized differences.

Parameters:

  • version1 (string, required): First version to compare

    • Available versions: Check server output for current list

  • version2 (string, required): Second version to compare

    • Available versions: Check server output for current list

Returns:

  • version1 / version2: Version strings compared

  • release_date_v1 / release_date_v2: Release dates for each version

  • category_comparison: Object with category-wise metrics

    • version1_count: Change count in first version

    • version2_count: Change count in second version

    • new_in_v2: List of features new in second version

Use Cases:

  • Planning upgrade paths

  • Understanding feature additions between versions

  • Assessing compatibility impacts


2. get_release_changes

Retrieve all changes for a specific Commvault release, optionally filtered by category.

Parameters:

  • version (string, required): Release version to query

  • category (string, optional): Filter by functional category

    • Available categories: Virtualization, Security, Database, Storage, APIs, User Experience

Returns:

  • version: Release version queried

  • release_date: When the release was published

  • category (if filtered): The specific category requested

  • changes: Array of change objects with title and description

  • total: Count of changes returned

Use Cases:

  • Identifying all changes in a specific release

  • Finding changes related to a specific product area

  • Generating release notes for internal teams


3. get_category_changes

Retrieve changes for a functional category across multiple releases.

Parameters:

  • category (string, required): Functional category to retrieve

    • Available categories: Virtualization, Security, Database, Storage, APIs, User Experience

  • start_version (string, optional): Filter from this version onward

  • end_version (string, optional): Filter through this version

Returns:

  • category: The category queried

  • total_changes: Total count across all matching releases

  • changes_by_version: Object mapping versions to their changes in this category

  • versions_filtered: Boolean indicating if version range was applied

Use Cases:

  • Tracking evolution of a feature area over time

  • Understanding security enhancements across versions

  • Planning API migration strategies


4. generate_summary

Generate a human-readable summary for a release in multiple formats.

Parameters:

  • version (string, required): Release version to summarize

  • format (string, optional, default: "markdown"): Output format

    • Valid values: "markdown", "html", "plaintext"

  • include_metrics (boolean, optional, default: true): Include change statistics

Returns:

  • version: Release version

  • release_date: Publication date

  • format: Requested format

  • content: Formatted summary text

  • metrics (if included):

    • Per-category change counts

    • Total change count

Use Cases:

  • Creating release announcement content

  • Generating documentation

  • Providing summaries in chat interfaces


Installation

Prerequisites

  • Node.js 18.0.0 or higher

  • npm or yarn package manager

  • 50 MB disk space for dependencies and build artifacts

Steps

  1. Clone the repository

    git clone https://github.com/yourusername/commvault-release-comparison-mcp.git
    cd commvault-release-comparison-mcp
  2. Install dependencies

    npm install
  3. Build the project

    npm run build

    This compiles TypeScript to JavaScript in the build/ directory.

  4. Verify the build

    ls -la build/

    You should see index.js and subdirectories for data/ and services/.

Development Setup

For active development with auto-recompilation:

npm run watch

This starts the TypeScript compiler in watch mode. Changes to source files will automatically trigger recompilation.

Testing Data Loading

Verify the data loading service works correctly:

npm run build
node examples/test-data-loading.mjs

This runs a comprehensive test suite covering:

  • Release loading and caching

  • Version comparison

  • Data source fallback

  • Diagnostic information

Local Registration with Claude

  1. Open Claude Code (CLI or IDE extension)

  2. Create or update .claude/settings.json:

    {
      "mcpServers": {
        "commvault-release-comparison": {
          "type": "stdio",
          "command": "node",
          "args": ["/path/to/commvault-release-comparison-mcp/build/index.js"],
          "disabled": false
        }
      }
    }
  3. Replace /path/to/ with the actual absolute path to your installation.

  4. Restart Claude Code to load the server.

Option 2: Via Claude Web Interface

If using Claude at claude.ai:

  1. Navigate to your account settings

  2. Find the "MCP Servers" or "Extensions" section

  3. Add a new server with:

    • Name: commvault-release-comparison

    • Type: stdio

    • Command: node

    • Arguments: ["/path/to/build/index.js"]

  4. Save and refresh

Option 3: Using the CLI

If you have the Claude CLI installed:

claude mcp add commvault-release-comparison \
  --type stdio \
  --command node \
  --args '"/path/to/commvault-release-comparison-mcp/build/index.js"'

Verification

Test that the server is registered:

# Start the server directly to verify it launches
node build/index.js &

# In another terminal, you can check if it's running
# The server should print: "Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server started"

If using Claude Code, simply try calling a tool in your chat and Claude should offer auto-complete for available tools.

Example Tool Calls

Example 1: Compare Two Releases

User Query:

"What changed between version 14.0 and 15.0?"

Tool Call:

{
  "name": "compare_releases",
  "arguments": {
    "version1": "14.0",
    "version2": "15.0"
  }
}

Sample Response:

{
  "version1": "14.0",
  "version2": "15.0",
  "release_date_v1": "2024-01-15",
  "release_date_v2": "2024-06-20",
  "category_comparison": {
    "Virtualization": {
      "version1_count": 5,
      "version2_count": 8,
      "new_in_v2": [
        "Enhanced Kubernetes support",
        "Improved VM cloning"
      ]
    },
    "Security": {
      "version1_count": 3,
      "version2_count": 5,
      "new_in_v2": [
        "Multi-factor authentication enhancements"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Example 2: Get Release Changes by Category

User Query:

"What security improvements are in version 15.0?"

Tool Call:

{
  "name": "get_release_changes",
  "arguments": {
    "version": "15.0",
    "category": "Security"
  }
}

Sample Response:

{
  "version": "15.0",
  "release_date": "2024-06-20",
  "category": "Security",
  "changes": [
    {
      "id": "sec-001",
      "title": "Multi-factor authentication enhancements",
      "description": "Support for FIDO2 keys and improved SMS delivery"
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-002",
      "title": "Enhanced encryption algorithms",
      "description": "Support for AES-256-GCM across all data flows"
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-003",
      "title": "API token rotation",
      "description": "Automatic and manual token rotation policies"
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-004",
      "title": "Audit logging improvements",
      "description": "Detailed logging of all administrative actions"
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-005",
      "title": "RBAC enhancements",
      "description": "Fine-grained role-based access controls"
    }
  ],
  "total": 5
}

Example 3: View Category Evolution

User Query:

"Show me how virtualization features have evolved across the last few releases."

Tool Call:

{
  "name": "get_category_changes",
  "arguments": {
    "category": "Virtualization"
  }
}

Sample Response:

{
  "category": "Virtualization",
  "total_changes": 18,
  "changes_by_version": {
    "13.0": [
      {
        "id": "virt-001",
        "title": "VMware 7.0 support",
        "description": "Full support for VMware vSphere 7.0"
      },
      {
        "id": "virt-002",
        "title": "Hyper-V Live Migration",
        "description": "Improved live migration handling"
      }
    ],
    "14.0": [
      {
        "id": "virt-003",
        "title": "Kubernetes integration",
        "description": "Native Kubernetes cluster backup and recovery"
      }
    ],
    "15.0": [
      {
        "id": "virt-004",
        "title": "OpenStack support",
        "description": "OpenStack cloud platform integration"
      }
    ]
  },
  "versions_filtered": false
}

Example 4: Generate Formatted Summary

User Query:

"Generate a markdown summary of version 15.0 with statistics."

Tool Call:

{
  "name": "generate_summary",
  "arguments": {
    "version": "15.0",
    "format": "markdown",
    "include_metrics": true
  }
}

Sample Response:

{
  "version": "15.0",
  "release_date": "2024-06-20",
  "format": "markdown",
  "content": "# Commvault 15.0 Release\n\n**Release Date**: 2024-06-20\n\n## Summary\nRelease 15.0 includes 24 major enhancements across virtualization, security, database, and storage categories.\n\n## Changes by Category\n\n### Virtualization\n- **Enhanced Kubernetes support**: Expanded container orchestration capabilities\n- **Improved VM cloning**: Faster and more reliable VM replication\n\n### Security\n- **Multi-factor authentication enhancements**: Support for FIDO2 keys\n- **Enhanced encryption algorithms**: AES-256-GCM support\n\n### Database\n- **Oracle 21c support**: Latest Oracle database compatibility\n- **MongoDB backup enhancements**: Improved backup consistency\n\n### Storage\n- **Object storage integration**: S3-compatible storage support\n- **Deduplication improvements**: 30% better compression ratios\n\n## Statistics\n- Virtualization: 8 enhancements\n- Security: 5 enhancements\n- Database: 6 enhancements\n- Storage: 5 enhancements\n- **Total**: 24 enhancements",
  "metrics": {
    "virtualization": 8,
    "security": 5,
    "database": 6,
    "storage": 5,
    "total": 24
  }
}

Future Enhancements

Phase 2: Expanded Data Loading (IN PROGRESS)

  • Dynamic Release Data: Now loads from Commvault documentation with fallback

  • Multi-Source Support: Pluggable architecture for custom data sources

  • Intelligent Caching: TTL-based cache with automatic expiration

  • Automatic Fallback: Falls back to mock data if web sources fail

  • 🔄 Database Backend: Persist loaded data to PostgreSQL/MongoDB

  • 🔄 Version Discovery: Auto-detect available versions from sources

  • 🔄 Custom Parsers: Support for different documentation formats

Phase 3: Data and Features

  • Search Functionality: Full-text search across all release notes

  • Deprecation Tracking: Identify deprecated features and migration paths

  • Performance Impact Analysis: Compare performance changes between versions

  • Breaking Changes Detection: Highlight incompatible changes between versions

Phase 3: Advanced Analytics

  • Trend Analysis: Identify areas of focus in recent releases (security, performance, etc.)

  • Feature Roadmap Insights: Predict upcoming features based on development patterns

  • Impact Assessment: Estimate organizational impact of specific changes

  • Compatibility Checker: Verify if current environment supports target release

Phase 4: Integration and Distribution

  • MCPB Distribution: Bundle as .mcpb file for easy installation

  • Claude Code Marketplace: List on official MCP server registry

  • Slack Integration: Expose as Slack bot for team collaboration

  • Documentation Website: Dedicated site for accessing release information

  • API Endpoint: RESTful API for programmatic access

  • Webhook Support: Real-time notifications for new releases

Phase 5: Enterprise Features

  • Multi-tenant Support: Organization-specific release configurations

  • Custom Categories: Allow users to organize changes by their priorities

  • Comparison History: Track and save comparison results

  • Export Capabilities: Generate PDF/Excel reports

  • Authentication: Secure access for sensitive release information

  • Audit Logging: Track who accessed which release information

Phase 6: Machine Learning

  • Smart Summaries: AI-powered summaries tailored to user's specific use cases

  • Impact Prediction: ML-based risk assessment for upgrades

  • Change Classification: Automatic categorization of complex changes

  • Intelligent Recommendations: Suggest releases based on feature needs

Contributing

Contributions are welcome! To contribute:

  1. Fork the repository

  2. Create a feature branch (git checkout -b feature/your-feature)

  3. Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Add new feature')

  4. Push to the branch (git push origin feature/your-feature)

  5. Open a Pull Request

Please ensure:

  • TypeScript code is properly typed

  • Changes compile without errors (npm run build)

  • Code follows existing style conventions

  • Commit messages are clear and descriptive

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

Support

For issues, questions, or suggestions:

  1. GitHub Issues: Open an issue on GitHub

  2. Documentation: Check the docs/ directory for additional information

  3. Project Plan: See docs/project-plan.md for architectural decisions


Version: 1.0.0
Last Updated: 2026-08-06
Maintainer: Chandrakanth Sawant

Available Tools

4 tools
compare_releasesB

Compare two Commvault release versions and show differences category-wise

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
version1YesFirst version to compare. Available: 11.46, 11.44
version2YesSecond version to compare. Available: 11.46, 11.44

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states that it 'show[s] differences category-wise', but does not disclose whether it is a safe read-only operation, what the output structure looks like, or any error/edge-case behavior. This is minimal for a comparison tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that immediately states the action and resource, with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with two fully described parameters, but the description lacks behavioral context (e.g., output format, limitations) and usage guidance. It is adequate for a basic comparison tool but leaves gaps in the absence of annotations and output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides complete descriptions for both parameters, including available version values (11.46, 11.44), so the description adds no new semantics about parameter syntax or relationships. Baseline 3 applies due to 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'compare' with the resource 'two Commvault release versions' and the outcome 'show differences category-wise', clearly distinguishing it from siblings like get_release_changes or generate_summary, which are not about comparing two versions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives such as get_release_changes or get_category_changes. It only states the function, without exclusions or contextual recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

generate_summaryB

Generate a human-readable summary for a release

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formatNoOutput format for the summary
versionYesRelease version. Available: 11.46, 11.44
include_metricsNoInclude change counts and statistics

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description only states the action without disclosing side effects, permissions, output format, or any behavioral constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, immediately front-loaded with the purpose, no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has three parameters and no output schema, yet the description only gives a one-line purpose, leaving gaps about when to use it and what the resulting summary contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no additional meaning beyond the well-documented parameters; baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action (generate) and resource (human-readable summary for a release), clearly distinct from sibling tools that compare releases or fetch changes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to choose this tool over compare_releases or get_release_changes; no alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_category_changesA

Get changes for a selected category across releases

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
categoryYesCategory to retrieve. Available: APIs, Database, Security, Storage, User Experience, Virtualization
end_versionNoOptional end version for filtering. Available: 11.46, 11.44
start_versionNoOptional start version for filtering. Available: 11.46, 11.44

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral burden. It only states the purpose and does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what the response looks like, or any limitations (e.g., pagination, ordering). The term 'Get' hints at read-only, but this is implied, not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the essence without extra words. Every word contributes to meaning, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a simple interface with good parameter documentation, but no output schema or annotations. The description does not clarify return value structure or any behavioral constraints, leaving some gaps. However, for a straightforward get operation, it is minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter clearly documented (e.g., category lists available values, start/end_version list version options). The description adds minimal semantic context beyond the schema ('selected category' and 'across releases'), so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get changes for a selected category across releases' uses a specific verb (Get) and resource (changes for a selected category), clearly distinguishing it from siblings like compare_releases or get_release_changes. The category scope and 'across releases' provide clear differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving category-specific change history across releases, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over siblings or when not to use it. No alternative tools are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_release_changesB

Get all changes for a selected release

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
versionYesRelease version. Available: 11.46, 11.44
categoryNoOptional filter by category. Available: APIs, Database, Security, Storage, User Experience, Virtualization

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as output format, filtering behavior, or any side effects. It only states what it does, not how it behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no redundant information, earning top marks for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks explicit guidance on alternatives and return format. The sibling tool context signals exist but are not referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters, with descriptions for version (including available values) and category (including available values). The description adds no additional parameter context, so it relies on the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get all changes for a selected release', using a specific verb (get) and resource (release changes). This distinguishes it from siblings like compare_releases and get_category_changes, as it targets all changes for a single release.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus get_category_changes or generate_summary, leaving the agent to infer based on sibling names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 4 tool updatesv1.0.0
    • First observedcompare_releases
    • First observedgenerate_summary
    • First observedget_category_changes
    • First observedget_release_changes

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: comparing two releases, retrieving all changes for a release, retrieving changes by category, and generating a summary. There is no overlap in their functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: compare_releases, get_release_changes, get_category_changes, generate_summary. This makes the set predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count5/5

With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of release comparison and summarization. Each tool serves a distinct need without redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the core comparison workflow: comparing releases, fetching changes, filtering by category, and generating summaries. A tool to list available releases would make the set more self-contained, but the current coverage is sufficient for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessSyncing

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server for managing Maven dependency versions using direct metadata parsing from Maven Central. It provides tools to fetch latest stable versions, list version history, and compare versions with upgrade recommendations.
    4
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server for DealHub administrators to manage versions (list, get, activate, duplicate) through natural language commands via Claude and other AI agents.
    107
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/csawantgit/commvault-release-comparison-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server