commvault-release-comparison-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@commvault-release-comparison-mcpCompare security changes between v11.44 and v11.46"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to compare Commvault release versions and analyze product changes across functional areas.
Problem Statement
Commvault customers and administrators face a significant challenge when planning product upgrades:
Fragmented Information: Release details are scattered across multiple documentation pages and release notes
Information Overload: Large volumes of release notes make it difficult to identify changes relevant to specific needs
Category Blindness: Users struggle to understand how changes impact particular functional areas such as Virtualization, Security, Storage, Databases, and APIs
Time-Consuming Analysis: Manual review of multiple versions is labor-intensive and error-prone
This fragmentation increases the time and effort required to make informed decisions about upgrade timing and planning.
Related MCP server: Maven Version Server
Solution Overview
The Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server bridges this gap by providing intelligent tools for exploring and comparing release information. It enables:
Quick Comparisons: Compare two release versions side-by-side with categorized change summaries
Targeted Queries: Retrieve changes specific to functional areas of interest
Version Analysis: View all changes for a specific release, optionally filtered by category
Human-Readable Summaries: Generate formatted release summaries in multiple output formats
AI-Powered Integration: Leverage Claude and other AI assistants to answer questions about Commvault releases
By exposing release data through MCP tools, customers can integrate release comparison capabilities directly into their AI workflows, enabling faster, more informed decision-making.
Architecture
Component Overview
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Claude/AI Assistant │
└────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│ MCP Protocol (stdio)
┌────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ │
│ │ Tool Router │ │ Tool Handlers │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ - compare_releases │─▶│ - Compare Logic │ │
│ │ - get_release_... │ │ - Query Logic │ │
│ │ - get_category_... │ │ - Format Logic │ │
│ │ - generate_summary │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌────────▼────────────────────────▼──────────┐ │
│ │ Release Manager (Singleton) │ │
│ │ - Coordinates data loading │ │
│ │ - Manages caching with TTL │ │
│ │ - Handles multiple data sources │ │
│ └────────┬─────────────────────────────────┬┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌────────▼────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ │
│ │ Release Data │ │ Cache Manager │ │ │
│ │ Loader │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ - In-memory │ │ │
│ │ - Multi-source │ │ - TTL-based │ │ │
│ │ fallback │ │ - Expiration │ │ │
│ │ - Dedup │ │ │ │ │
│ │ concurrent │ └─────────────────┘ │ │
│ │ requests │ │ │
│ └──────┬──────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌──────┴──────────────────────────────────┴──┐ │
│ │ Data Sources (pluggable) │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Commvault Documentation Source │ │
│ │ - Fetches from commvault.com │ │
│ │ - Supports versions 11.44, 11.46+ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 2. Mock Data Source (Fallback) │ │
│ │ - Provides test data │ │
│ │ - v11.44, v11.46 included │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 3. Custom Sources (extensible) │ │
│ │ - Database, API, File sources │ │
│ │ - Implement DataSource interface │ │
│ └───────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Data Loading Architecture
The system uses a dynamic, multi-source data loading approach:
Initialization: On startup,
ReleaseManagerloads specified versionsData Sources: Tries sources in order (Commvault docs → Mock data)
Automatic Fallback: If web source fails, automatically uses mock data
Intelligent Caching: Results cached with TTL to avoid repeated fetches
On-Demand Loading: Versions loaded on first access if not preloaded
See docs/data-loading.md for complete architecture details.
Technology Stack
Runtime: Node.js 18+
Language: TypeScript 5.0+
Protocol: Model Context Protocol (MCP) v1.0.0
Build Tool: TypeScript Compiler (tsc)
Project Structure
commvault-release-comparison-mcp/
├── src/
│ ├── index.ts # Main MCP server implementation
│ ├── data/
│ │ ├── releases.ts # Type definitions and exports
│ │ └── releaseManager.ts # Release data coordinator
│ └── services/
│ ├── types.ts # Shared data source interfaces
│ ├── cacheManager.ts # TTL-based cache implementation
│ ├── releaseDataLoader.ts # Multi-source loader orchestrator
│ ├── commvaultDocSource.ts # Fetches from Commvault docs
│ └── mockDataSource.ts # Fallback test data
├── build/ # Compiled JavaScript output
├── docs/
│ ├── project-plan.md # Original project planning
│ ├── data-loading.md # Data loading architecture (NEW)
│ ├── data-sources-config.md # Configuration guide (NEW)
│ └── DATA-LOADING-SUMMARY.md # Implementation summary (NEW)
├── examples/
│ └── test-data-loading.mjs # Data loading test suite (NEW)
├── package.json # Dependencies and metadata
├── tsconfig.json # TypeScript configuration
├── README.md # This file
└── LICENSE # MIT LicenseServices Overview
Data Loading Services
ReleaseManager - Singleton coordinator for all data operations
ReleaseDataLoader - Manages multiple data sources with fallback
CacheManager - In-memory cache with TTL expiration
Data Sources
CommvaultDocSource - Fetches from official Commvault documentation
MockDataSource - Provides test data for v11.44 and v11.46
Custom Sources - Extensible architecture for custom implementations
MCP Tools
1. compare_releases
Compare two Commvault release versions and view categorized differences.
Parameters:
version1(string, required): First version to compareAvailable versions: Check server output for current list
version2(string, required): Second version to compareAvailable versions: Check server output for current list
Returns:
version1/version2: Version strings comparedrelease_date_v1/release_date_v2: Release dates for each versioncategory_comparison: Object with category-wise metricsversion1_count: Change count in first versionversion2_count: Change count in second versionnew_in_v2: List of features new in second version
Use Cases:
Planning upgrade paths
Understanding feature additions between versions
Assessing compatibility impacts
2. get_release_changes
Retrieve all changes for a specific Commvault release, optionally filtered by category.
Parameters:
version(string, required): Release version to querycategory(string, optional): Filter by functional categoryAvailable categories: Virtualization, Security, Database, Storage, APIs, User Experience
Returns:
version: Release version queriedrelease_date: When the release was publishedcategory(if filtered): The specific category requestedchanges: Array of change objects with title and descriptiontotal: Count of changes returned
Use Cases:
Identifying all changes in a specific release
Finding changes related to a specific product area
Generating release notes for internal teams
3. get_category_changes
Retrieve changes for a functional category across multiple releases.
Parameters:
category(string, required): Functional category to retrieveAvailable categories: Virtualization, Security, Database, Storage, APIs, User Experience
start_version(string, optional): Filter from this version onwardend_version(string, optional): Filter through this version
Returns:
category: The category queriedtotal_changes: Total count across all matching releaseschanges_by_version: Object mapping versions to their changes in this categoryversions_filtered: Boolean indicating if version range was applied
Use Cases:
Tracking evolution of a feature area over time
Understanding security enhancements across versions
Planning API migration strategies
4. generate_summary
Generate a human-readable summary for a release in multiple formats.
Parameters:
version(string, required): Release version to summarizeformat(string, optional, default: "markdown"): Output formatValid values: "markdown", "html", "plaintext"
include_metrics(boolean, optional, default: true): Include change statistics
Returns:
version: Release versionrelease_date: Publication dateformat: Requested formatcontent: Formatted summary textmetrics(if included):Per-category change counts
Total change count
Use Cases:
Creating release announcement content
Generating documentation
Providing summaries in chat interfaces
Installation
Prerequisites
Node.js 18.0.0 or higher
npm or yarn package manager
50 MB disk space for dependencies and build artifacts
Steps
Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/commvault-release-comparison-mcp.git cd commvault-release-comparison-mcpInstall dependencies
npm installBuild the project
npm run buildThis compiles TypeScript to JavaScript in the
build/directory.Verify the build
ls -la build/You should see
index.jsand subdirectories fordata/andservices/.
Development Setup
For active development with auto-recompilation:
npm run watchThis starts the TypeScript compiler in watch mode. Changes to source files will automatically trigger recompilation.
Testing Data Loading
Verify the data loading service works correctly:
npm run build
node examples/test-data-loading.mjsThis runs a comprehensive test suite covering:
Release loading and caching
Version comparison
Data source fallback
Diagnostic information
Local Registration with Claude
Option 1: Via Claude Code Settings (Recommended)
Open Claude Code (CLI or IDE extension)
Create or update
.claude/settings.json:{ "mcpServers": { "commvault-release-comparison": { "type": "stdio", "command": "node", "args": ["/path/to/commvault-release-comparison-mcp/build/index.js"], "disabled": false } } }Replace
/path/to/with the actual absolute path to your installation.Restart Claude Code to load the server.
Option 2: Via Claude Web Interface
If using Claude at claude.ai:
Navigate to your account settings
Find the "MCP Servers" or "Extensions" section
Add a new server with:
Name:
commvault-release-comparisonType:
stdioCommand:
nodeArguments:
["/path/to/build/index.js"]
Save and refresh
Option 3: Using the CLI
If you have the Claude CLI installed:
claude mcp add commvault-release-comparison \
--type stdio \
--command node \
--args '"/path/to/commvault-release-comparison-mcp/build/index.js"'Verification
Test that the server is registered:
# Start the server directly to verify it launches
node build/index.js &
# In another terminal, you can check if it's running
# The server should print: "Commvault Release Comparison MCP Server started"If using Claude Code, simply try calling a tool in your chat and Claude should offer auto-complete for available tools.
Example Tool Calls
Example 1: Compare Two Releases
User Query:
"What changed between version 14.0 and 15.0?"
Tool Call:
{
"name": "compare_releases",
"arguments": {
"version1": "14.0",
"version2": "15.0"
}
}Sample Response:
{
"version1": "14.0",
"version2": "15.0",
"release_date_v1": "2024-01-15",
"release_date_v2": "2024-06-20",
"category_comparison": {
"Virtualization": {
"version1_count": 5,
"version2_count": 8,
"new_in_v2": [
"Enhanced Kubernetes support",
"Improved VM cloning"
]
},
"Security": {
"version1_count": 3,
"version2_count": 5,
"new_in_v2": [
"Multi-factor authentication enhancements"
]
}
}
}Example 2: Get Release Changes by Category
User Query:
"What security improvements are in version 15.0?"
Tool Call:
{
"name": "get_release_changes",
"arguments": {
"version": "15.0",
"category": "Security"
}
}Sample Response:
{
"version": "15.0",
"release_date": "2024-06-20",
"category": "Security",
"changes": [
{
"id": "sec-001",
"title": "Multi-factor authentication enhancements",
"description": "Support for FIDO2 keys and improved SMS delivery"
},
{
"id": "sec-002",
"title": "Enhanced encryption algorithms",
"description": "Support for AES-256-GCM across all data flows"
},
{
"id": "sec-003",
"title": "API token rotation",
"description": "Automatic and manual token rotation policies"
},
{
"id": "sec-004",
"title": "Audit logging improvements",
"description": "Detailed logging of all administrative actions"
},
{
"id": "sec-005",
"title": "RBAC enhancements",
"description": "Fine-grained role-based access controls"
}
],
"total": 5
}Example 3: View Category Evolution
User Query:
"Show me how virtualization features have evolved across the last few releases."
Tool Call:
{
"name": "get_category_changes",
"arguments": {
"category": "Virtualization"
}
}Sample Response:
{
"category": "Virtualization",
"total_changes": 18,
"changes_by_version": {
"13.0": [
{
"id": "virt-001",
"title": "VMware 7.0 support",
"description": "Full support for VMware vSphere 7.0"
},
{
"id": "virt-002",
"title": "Hyper-V Live Migration",
"description": "Improved live migration handling"
}
],
"14.0": [
{
"id": "virt-003",
"title": "Kubernetes integration",
"description": "Native Kubernetes cluster backup and recovery"
}
],
"15.0": [
{
"id": "virt-004",
"title": "OpenStack support",
"description": "OpenStack cloud platform integration"
}
]
},
"versions_filtered": false
}Example 4: Generate Formatted Summary
User Query:
"Generate a markdown summary of version 15.0 with statistics."
Tool Call:
{
"name": "generate_summary",
"arguments": {
"version": "15.0",
"format": "markdown",
"include_metrics": true
}
}Sample Response:
{
"version": "15.0",
"release_date": "2024-06-20",
"format": "markdown",
"content": "# Commvault 15.0 Release\n\n**Release Date**: 2024-06-20\n\n## Summary\nRelease 15.0 includes 24 major enhancements across virtualization, security, database, and storage categories.\n\n## Changes by Category\n\n### Virtualization\n- **Enhanced Kubernetes support**: Expanded container orchestration capabilities\n- **Improved VM cloning**: Faster and more reliable VM replication\n\n### Security\n- **Multi-factor authentication enhancements**: Support for FIDO2 keys\n- **Enhanced encryption algorithms**: AES-256-GCM support\n\n### Database\n- **Oracle 21c support**: Latest Oracle database compatibility\n- **MongoDB backup enhancements**: Improved backup consistency\n\n### Storage\n- **Object storage integration**: S3-compatible storage support\n- **Deduplication improvements**: 30% better compression ratios\n\n## Statistics\n- Virtualization: 8 enhancements\n- Security: 5 enhancements\n- Database: 6 enhancements\n- Storage: 5 enhancements\n- **Total**: 24 enhancements",
"metrics": {
"virtualization": 8,
"security": 5,
"database": 6,
"storage": 5,
"total": 24
}
}Future Enhancements
Phase 2: Expanded Data Loading (IN PROGRESS)
✅ Dynamic Release Data: Now loads from Commvault documentation with fallback
✅ Multi-Source Support: Pluggable architecture for custom data sources
✅ Intelligent Caching: TTL-based cache with automatic expiration
✅ Automatic Fallback: Falls back to mock data if web sources fail
🔄 Database Backend: Persist loaded data to PostgreSQL/MongoDB
🔄 Version Discovery: Auto-detect available versions from sources
🔄 Custom Parsers: Support for different documentation formats
Phase 3: Data and Features
Search Functionality: Full-text search across all release notes
Deprecation Tracking: Identify deprecated features and migration paths
Performance Impact Analysis: Compare performance changes between versions
Breaking Changes Detection: Highlight incompatible changes between versions
Phase 3: Advanced Analytics
Trend Analysis: Identify areas of focus in recent releases (security, performance, etc.)
Feature Roadmap Insights: Predict upcoming features based on development patterns
Impact Assessment: Estimate organizational impact of specific changes
Compatibility Checker: Verify if current environment supports target release
Phase 4: Integration and Distribution
MCPB Distribution: Bundle as .mcpb file for easy installation
Claude Code Marketplace: List on official MCP server registry
Slack Integration: Expose as Slack bot for team collaboration
Documentation Website: Dedicated site for accessing release information
API Endpoint: RESTful API for programmatic access
Webhook Support: Real-time notifications for new releases
Phase 5: Enterprise Features
Multi-tenant Support: Organization-specific release configurations
Custom Categories: Allow users to organize changes by their priorities
Comparison History: Track and save comparison results
Export Capabilities: Generate PDF/Excel reports
Authentication: Secure access for sensitive release information
Audit Logging: Track who accessed which release information
Phase 6: Machine Learning
Smart Summaries: AI-powered summaries tailored to user's specific use cases
Impact Prediction: ML-based risk assessment for upgrades
Change Classification: Automatic categorization of complex changes
Intelligent Recommendations: Suggest releases based on feature needs
Contributing
Contributions are welcome! To contribute:
Fork the repository
Create a feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/your-feature)Commit your changes (
git commit -am 'Add new feature')Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/your-feature)Open a Pull Request
Please ensure:
TypeScript code is properly typed
Changes compile without errors (
npm run build)Code follows existing style conventions
Commit messages are clear and descriptive
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.
Support
For issues, questions, or suggestions:
GitHub Issues: Open an issue on GitHub
Documentation: Check the
docs/directory for additional informationProject Plan: See
docs/project-plan.mdfor architectural decisions
Related Resources
Version: 1.0.0
Last Updated: 2026-08-06
Maintainer: Chandrakanth Sawant
Available Tools
4 toolscompare_releasesB
Compare two Commvault release versions and show differences category-wise
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| version1 | Yes | First version to compare. Available: 11.46, 11.44 | |
| version2 | Yes | Second version to compare. Available: 11.46, 11.44 |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It states that it 'show[s] differences category-wise', but does not disclose whether it is a safe read-only operation, what the output structure looks like, or any error/edge-case behavior. This is minimal for a comparison tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that immediately states the action and resource, with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with two fully described parameters, but the description lacks behavioral context (e.g., output format, limitations) and usage guidance. It is adequate for a basic comparison tool but leaves gaps in the absence of annotations and output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already provides complete descriptions for both parameters, including available version values (11.46, 11.44), so the description adds no new semantics about parameter syntax or relationships. Baseline 3 applies due to 100% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'compare' with the resource 'two Commvault release versions' and the outcome 'show differences category-wise', clearly distinguishing it from siblings like get_release_changes or generate_summary, which are not about comparing two versions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives such as get_release_changes or get_category_changes. It only states the function, without exclusions or contextual recommendations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
generate_summaryB
Generate a human-readable summary for a release
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| format | No | Output format for the summary | |
| version | Yes | Release version. Available: 11.46, 11.44 | |
| include_metrics | No | Include change counts and statistics |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description only states the action without disclosing side effects, permissions, output format, or any behavioral constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, immediately front-loaded with the purpose, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has three parameters and no output schema, yet the description only gives a one-line purpose, leaving gaps about when to use it and what the resulting summary contains.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no additional meaning beyond the well-documented parameters; baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific action (generate) and resource (human-readable summary for a release), clearly distinct from sibling tools that compare releases or fetch changes.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides no guidance on when to choose this tool over compare_releases or get_release_changes; no alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_category_changesA
Get changes for a selected category across releases
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | Yes | Category to retrieve. Available: APIs, Database, Security, Storage, User Experience, Virtualization | |
| end_version | No | Optional end version for filtering. Available: 11.46, 11.44 | |
| start_version | No | Optional start version for filtering. Available: 11.46, 11.44 |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral burden. It only states the purpose and does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what the response looks like, or any limitations (e.g., pagination, ordering). The term 'Get' hints at read-only, but this is implied, not explicit.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the essence without extra words. Every word contributes to meaning, making it highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has a simple interface with good parameter documentation, but no output schema or annotations. The description does not clarify return value structure or any behavioral constraints, leaving some gaps. However, for a straightforward get operation, it is minimally adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter clearly documented (e.g., category lists available values, start/end_version list version options). The description adds minimal semantic context beyond the schema ('selected category' and 'across releases'), so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get changes for a selected category across releases' uses a specific verb (Get) and resource (changes for a selected category), clearly distinguishing it from siblings like compare_releases or get_release_changes. The category scope and 'across releases' provide clear differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving category-specific change history across releases, but it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over siblings or when not to use it. No alternative tools are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_release_changesB
Get all changes for a selected release
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| version | Yes | Release version. Available: 11.46, 11.44 | |
| category | No | Optional filter by category. Available: APIs, Database, Security, Storage, User Experience, Virtualization |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as output format, filtering behavior, or any side effects. It only states what it does, not how it behaves.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence with no redundant information, earning top marks for conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks explicit guidance on alternatives and return format. The sibling tool context signals exist but are not referenced.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters, with descriptions for version (including available values) and category (including available values). The description adds no additional parameter context, so it relies on the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get all changes for a selected release', using a specific verb (get) and resource (release changes). This distinguishes it from siblings like compare_releases and get_category_changes, as it targets all changes for a single release.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus get_category_changes or generate_summary, leaving the agent to infer based on sibling names.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
compare_releases - First observed
generate_summary - First observed
get_category_changes - First observed
get_release_changes
TDQS
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: comparing two releases, retrieving all changes for a release, retrieving changes by category, and generating a summary. There is no overlap in their functionality.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: compare_releases, get_release_changes, get_category_changes, generate_summary. This makes the set predictable and easy to navigate.
With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of release comparison and summarization. Each tool serves a distinct need without redundancy or bloat.
The tool set covers the core comparison workflow: comparing releases, fetching changes, filtering by category, and generating summaries. A tool to list available releases would make the set more self-contained, but the current coverage is sufficient for the stated purpose.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
An agent-friendly API for product changelogs. A unified registry via CLI, API, or MCP.
MCP server for Product Management
The MCP server that vets MCP servers: identity, risk grade and per-tool risk before you install.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing Git-related functionalities, primarily a tool to generate diffs for Git merge commits against their first parent.4-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing Maven dependency versions using direct metadata parsing from Maven Central. It provides tools to fetch latest stable versions, list version history, and compare versions with upgrade recommendations.4-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for DealHub administrators to manage versions (list, get, activate, duplicate) through natural language commands via Claude and other AI agents.107MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for comparing JSON, XML, XLSX, CSV, and text data using expected templates, returning pass/fail with difference details.14MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/csawantgit/commvault-release-comparison-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server