Transfa
This server provides a file sharing service, allowing you to upload, manage, and share files programmatically.
Upload files: Upload any file and receive a direct download link and a browser-friendly share page URL, along with a SHA-256 checksum. Supports options such as custom filename, password protection, TTL/expiry (e.g.
1h,24h,7d,30d), single-use/burn-after-read links, maximum download count limits, and a grace period after expiry. Works without an API key (guest mode, 10 MB limit).Get file metadata: Retrieve detailed metadata for an upload by its ID — including filename, size, SHA-256 hash, MIME type, expiry date, download count, active status, password protection status, and grace period info — without downloading the file.
List recent uploads: Retrieve a list of your recent uploads (requires an API key). Supports configurable result limits (1–100, default 10).
Delete uploads: Immediately and permanently delete an upload by its ID (requires ownership via matching API key).
$ tf upload model.gguf
✓ Uploaded model.gguf (4.2 GB) → https://transfa.sh/f/xK9mRp
SHA-256 a3f8c2...d91b
Expires in 7 daysWhy transfa?
Most file-sharing tools are built for humans clicking through UIs. transfa is built for the terminal — designed to be called from shell scripts, CI pipelines, and AI agents (Claude, GPT, Cursor, etc.) that need to move files without friction.
No signup required — just install and upload
Any format, any size — up to 100 GB; ML models, archives, binaries, code, media
Built for agents — JSON API, SHA-256 checksums, idempotent uploads
Password protection, download limits, TTL — full control over every link
100+ formats detected — MIME type auto-detection including
.gguf,.safetensors,.parquet,.ipynb, and more
Related MCP server: vnsh-mcp
Install
Node.js / CLI
npm install -g transfaPython SDK
pip install transfaMCP server (Claude, Cursor, any MCP-compatible agent)
npx -y transfa-mcpOr use the raw install script:
curl -fsSL https://transfa.sh/install | shQuick start
# Upload a file (no account needed)
tf upload photo.jpg
# Upload with custom TTL and password
tf upload secret.zip --ttl 24h --password hunter2
# Upload and pipe the URL to clipboard
tf upload bundle.tar.gz | grep url | awk '{print $2}' | pbcopy
# Download a file
tf download https://transfa.sh/f/xK9mRp
# List your uploads
tf list
# Delete an upload
tf delete xK9mRpGitHub Actions
Upload build artifacts, coverage reports, and any CI output straight from your workflow:
- uses: colapsis/transfa-action@v1
id: upload
with:
file: ./dist/report.pdf
api-key: ${{ secrets.TRANSFA_API_KEY }}
- run: echo "${{ steps.upload.outputs.agent-link }}" >> $GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARYAll five outputs are available after the step: id, agent-link, human-link, sha256, expires-at.
See colapsis/transfa-action for the full input reference and more examples (password-protected links, self-hosted instances, single-download limits).
API
transfa is fully REST. Every operation the CLI does, you can do with curl or any HTTP client.
Upload
curl -X POST https://transfa.sh/api/upload \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TF_KEY" \
-F "file=@model.gguf" \
-F "ttl=7d"{
"id": "xK9mRp",
"url": "https://transfa.sh/f/xK9mRp",
"download_url": "https://transfa.sh/api/download/xK9mRp",
"filename": "model.gguf",
"bytes": 4512345678,
"sha256": "a3f8c2...d91b",
"expires_at": "2026-05-21T12:00:00.000Z"
}Upload options (form fields or headers):
Field | Header | Description |
|
| Expiry: |
| — | Password-protect the download link |
| — | Burn after N downloads |
|
| Override the stored filename |
Download
# Direct download (no auth required)
curl -L https://transfa.sh/api/download/xK9mRp -o model.gguf
# Password-protected
curl -L "https://transfa.sh/api/download/xK9mRp?password=hunter2" -o secret.zipFile info
curl https://transfa.sh/api/download/info/xK9mRp{
"id": "xK9mRp",
"filename": "model.gguf",
"bytes": 4512345678,
"sha256": "a3f8c2...d91b",
"mime_type": "application/octet-stream",
"download_count": 3,
"has_password": false,
"expires_at": "2026-05-21T12:00:00.000Z",
"active": true
}List uploads
curl https://transfa.sh/api/upload \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TF_KEY"Delete
curl -X DELETE https://transfa.sh/api/upload/xK9mRp \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TF_KEY"Supported formats
Over 100 file types with correct MIME detection — including types not in standard MIME databases:
Category | Formats |
ML models |
|
Data science |
|
Code |
|
Archives |
|
3D / Design |
|
Media |
|
Config |
|
Everything else |
|
Any other format is accepted as application/octet-stream — nothing is blocked.
Plans
Guest | Free | Pro | Team | |
Max file size | 10 MB | 500 MB | 50 GB | 100 GB |
Uploads / day | 5 | 20 | 500 | 5,000 |
Max TTL | 24h | 48h | 30 days | 180 days |
Storage | — | — | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Price | Free | Free | $12/mo | $48/mo |
Trial | — | — | 3-day free trial | 3-day free trial |
MCP server (Claude, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent)
transfa ships an MCP server that lets Claude, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent upload and share files autonomously — no shell commands, no infrastructure setup.
npx -y transfa-mcpClaude Desktop config
Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"transfa": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "transfa-mcp"],
"env": {
"TRANSFA_API_KEY": "your-api-key"
}
}
}
}The API key is optional — the server works in guest mode without one (10 MB / 24h limit).
Available MCP tools
Tool | Description |
| Upload a file from the local filesystem. Returns |
| Get metadata about an upload — filename, size, SHA-256, expiry, download count, provenance fields. |
| List recent uploads (requires API key). |
| Delete an upload immediately. |
| Get all files uploaded under a |
Example agent workflow
When Claude has transfa as an MCP tool, it can:
Generate a report → call
upload→ get a link → paste the link in the conversationPass a file to another agent by sharing the
agent_linkClean up with
delete_uploadwhen done
Python SDK
import transfa
# Upload
result = transfa.upload("model.pt", ttl="24h", run_id="run-42", artifact=True)
print(result.url, result.sha256)
# Download (SHA-256 verified)
transfa.download(result.id, output="model.pt")
# Provenance manifest for a run
manifest = transfa.run_artifacts("run-42")
# Async
async with transfa.AsyncClient() as client:
result = await client.upload("model.pt")See python/README.md for the full API reference.
Use with AI agents (script/subprocess)
transfa is also designed to be called from shell scripts, CI pipelines, and agents that prefer subprocess calls:
import subprocess, json
result = subprocess.run(
["tf", "upload", "output.csv"],
capture_output=True, text=True
)
data = json.loads(result.stdout)
print(data["url"]) # https://transfa.sh/f/xK9mRpOr use the REST API directly — no SDKs, no auth flows, just HTTP.
Self-hosting
git clone https://github.com/colapsis/transfa.git
cd transfa
cp .env.example .env # fill in your keys
npm install --prefix server
npm install --prefix cli
npm run build --prefix frontend
pm2 start ecosystem.config.cjsRequirements: Node.js 18+, nginx (for SSL/proxy)
See nginx/transfa.conf for a production-ready nginx config.
Environment variables
Variable | Description |
| Server port (default: |
| Public URL e.g. |
| Stripe secret key for billing |
| Stripe webhook signing secret |
| Stripe price ID for Pro plan |
| Stripe price ID for Team plan |
Security
Found a vulnerability? Please email tansfa.sh@gmail.com or see SECURITY.md.
Do not open a public issue for security reports.
License
MIT — © 2026 transfa contributors
Available Tools
4 toolsdelete_uploadA
Delete an upload immediately. Requires ownership (API key must match the uploader).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Upload ID to delete |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Discloses immediate effect and ownership prerequisite. Lacks mention of irreversibility or side effects, but deletion is generally understood.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Essential information front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one required param and no output schema, description covers purpose, condition, and parameter usage adequately.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema provides 100% coverage with 'Upload ID to delete'. Description adds no extra parameter semantics beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states action 'Delete an upload' and resource 'upload'. Differentiates from siblings (file_info, list_uploads, upload) by being the deletion tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Specifies immediate deletion and ownership requirement ('API key must match the uploader'). Does not mention alternatives for non-owners, but provides clear usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
file_infoA
Get metadata about an upload without downloading it. Returns filename, size, SHA-256, expiry, download count, active status, and whether the file is in a grace period.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Upload ID (the short code in the URL, e.g. "a7f9k2") |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Lists specific returned fields but lacks behavioral details like side effects or permissions; no annotations provided to compensate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One clear sentence plus a list of fields; every part adds value, no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly complete; omits error handling or prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description covers 100% of parameters; the tool description adds no extra parameter info beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get metadata') and the resource ('an upload'), distinguishing it from siblings like delete_upload and list_uploads.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The phrase 'without downloading it' implies a use case, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use compared to alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_uploadsA
List your recent uploads. Requires TRANSFA_API_KEY or a key saved by tf auth.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Number of results (1–100, default 10) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses the auth requirement but does not mention behavioral traits like idempotency, side effects, or data scope beyond 'recent uploads'. This is adequate for a simple list tool, but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with zero superfluous words. Front-loaded with the core action, followed by a critical prerequisite. Highly efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the single parameter and no output schema, the description covers purpose and authentication. It does not detail response format or pagination, but for a simple listing tool, these omissions are minor.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter, 'limit', is fully described in the input schema with details on range and default. The description adds no additional meaning, so baseline 3 applies due to 100% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific action and resource: 'List your recent uploads'. This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like delete_upload, file_info, and upload.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description includes authentication requirements ('Requires TRANSFA_API_KEY...'), providing clear precondition. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when not to use or comparison to siblings, though the purpose is self-evident.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
uploadA
Upload a file from the local filesystem and get a signed link. Returns an agent_link (direct download URL for scripts/agents) and a human_link (browser-friendly share page). SHA-256 is always computed and returned for integrity checks. Works without an API key (guest mode, 10 MB limit). Set TRANSFA_API_KEY for larger files and longer TTLs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Path to the file to upload | |
| expires | No | TTL: "1h", "24h", "7d", "30d". Default: 7d | |
| name | No | Override filename shown to recipient | |
| password | No | Password-protect the link | |
| once | No | Delete after first download | |
| max_downloads | No | Max download count | |
| grace | No | Grace period after expiry, e.g. "12h" — keeps file downloadable this long after TTL ends |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that a signed link is returned, SHA-256 is computed, guest mode works without API key (10 MB limit), and larger files need an API key. It also mentions both agent_link and human_link outputs. Does not cover error cases, but overall transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no extra words. First sentence states main action and return type. Second sentence adds SHA-256 and authentication mode with limits. Information is front-loaded and every sentence contributes.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without an output schema, the description effectively explains the two return link types and integrity check. For a 7-parameter tool, it covers authentication modes and limits. It lacks error handling details, but overall provides a complete enough picture for a typical upload scenario.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 7 parameters, so the schema already explains each parameter. The description adds value by explaining return format and authentication context, but does not add deeper semantic meaning to individual parameters beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Upload a file from the local filesystem and get a signed link.' It specifies the verb (upload) and the resource (file), and differentiates from sibling tools like delete_upload, file_info, and list_uploads by being the only upload action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides clear guidance on when to use: for uploading files. It explains guest mode vs. API key mode, file size limits, and hints at TTL options. Though it doesn't explicitly contrast with siblings, the context is sufficient for an agent to decide when to invoke.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
delete_upload - First observed
file_info - First observed
list_uploads - First observed
upload
TDQS
Each tool has a distinct purpose: uploading, listing, getting file info, and deleting. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
All tools use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (delete_upload, file_info, list_uploads, upload).
Four tools is well-scoped for a file upload service, covering essential operations without being too few or excessive.
Basic CRUD operations are covered (upload, list, info, delete). Minor gaps like update or TTL management exist but are not critical for the core functionality.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Get share links, publish and manage websites, artifacts and agents. No account needed.
File uploads for AI agents. Upload, list, and manage files. No signup required.
Cloud file relay: chunked uploads, folders, share links, inline text reads, ZIP packing.
File hosting for agents. Upload any file, get a public link in seconds.
Related MCP Servers
FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFile uploads for AI agents. Upload, list, and manage files from AI coding assistants like Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code Copilot with no signup required.1-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables sharing and reading encrypted files (text, images, logs) for AI workflows, with automatic 24-hour expiration and host-blind security.35156MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceUpload files to Drop to CDN and get instant public CDN URLs via MCP.9MIT

YAFL MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely transfer files between machines via encrypted, expiring share links, with tools for upload, download, status checks, and link management.MIT
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/colapsis/transfa'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server