Screenshot MCP Server
Provides automatic JPEG compression for captured screenshots, enabling efficient transfer of screen content for AI processing
Supports capturing screenshots on Linux operating systems, allowing AI tools to view and analyze content on Linux screens
Supports capturing screenshots on macOS operating systems, allowing AI tools to view and analyze content on macOS screens
Offers programmatic interface through Python, enabling custom screenshot capture implementations and integration with Python-based AI workflows
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Screenshot MCP Servertake a screenshot of my current screen"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Screenshot MCP Server
An MCP server that provides screenshot capabilities for AI tools, allowing them to capture and process screen content.
Overview
This MCP server enables AI tools to take screenshots of the user's screen, making it possible for AI assistants to see and analyze what the user is looking at. The server handles image capture, compression, and delivery in a format suitable for AI processing.
Related MCP server: Screen MCP
Features
Take full screen screenshots
Automatic JPEG compression for efficient transfer
Base64 encoded image data for reliable transmission
Support for both stdio and SSE transport modes
Configurable image quality and optimization
Simple command-line interface for testing
Installation
From Source
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/codingthefuturewithai/screenshot_mcp_server.git
cd screenshot_mcp_server
# Install using UV (recommended)
uv pip install -e .
# Or using pip
pip install -e .Available Tools
take_screenshot
Description: Takes a screenshot of the user's screen and returns it as a JPEG image.
Parameters: None
Returns:
Image content in JPEG format, base64 encoded
Usage
The server can be used in two ways:
Command Line Client
# Take a screenshot and save it to a file
screenshot_mcp_server-client output.jpgProgrammatic Usage
from mcp import ClientSession, StdioServerParameters
from mcp.client.stdio import stdio_client
async with stdio_client(StdioServerParameters(command="screenshot_mcp_server-server")) as (read, write):
async with ClientSession(read, write) as session:
result = await session.call_tool("take_screenshot")
# Process the screenshot data...Requirements
Python 3.10 or later (< 3.13)
Dependencies:
mcp >= 1.0.0
pyautogui >= 0.9.54
Pillow >= 10.0.0
Operating Systems: Linux, macOS, Windows
Configuration
The server supports two transport modes:
stdio (default): For command-line usage
SSE: For web-based applications, runs on port 3001 by default
To run in SSE mode:
screenshot_mcp_server-server-sse --port 3001License
This project is licensed under the MIT License.
Author
Tim Kitchens (timkitch@codingthefuture.ai)
Available Tools
1 tooltake_screenshotA
Take a screenshot of the user's screen and return it as an image
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the action and output format but lacks details on behavioral traits such as permissions required, whether it captures the entire screen or a region, privacy implications, or error handling. This is a significant gap for a tool with potential security and usability concerns.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core action and outcome with zero wasted words. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity and directly communicates its purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity (a potentially sensitive screen capture tool) and lack of annotations or output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to address critical context like security permissions, scope of capture, or return format details, leaving gaps that could hinder safe and effective use by an AI agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description does not add parameter semantics, but this is acceptable as there are no parameters to explain, aligning with the baseline for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the specific action ('take a screenshot') and the resource ('user's screen'), with the outcome specified ('return it as an image'). It distinguishes this tool's purpose unambiguously, especially given no sibling tools exist for comparison.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage context (e.g., when a visual capture of the screen is needed) but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives or any exclusions. With no sibling tools, this is adequate but lacks depth on prerequisites or constraints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
1 tool update
- First observed
take_screenshot
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The single tool 'take_screenshot' has a clearly distinct and unambiguous purpose.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'take_screenshot'. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency or deviation from any pattern.
A single tool for a screenshot server is too minimal for typical use cases. While it directly serves the core function, it lacks supporting tools (e.g., for selecting regions, managing screenshots, or configuring settings), making it feel thin and incomplete for the domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a screenshot domain. It only provides a basic capture function, with no tools for editing, saving, annotating, or managing screenshots, which are common in such applications, leading to significant gaps in functionality.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
OCR, transcription, file extraction, and image generation for AI agents via MCP.
Use AI models for chat, image, and video generation from Claude Code and other MCP hosts.
- mcpOAuthcom.screenshotink
Screenshot, diff, audit and sitemap-capture any web page — 5 MCP tools for AI agents.
Your memory, everywhere AI goes. Build knowledge once, access it via MCP anywhere.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing web development tools such as screen capturing capabilities that let AI agents take and work with screenshots of the user's screen.23015MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to capture screenshots and screen recordings through MCP with chunked session-based transfers for reliable image consumption. Supports multi-monitor selection, timeline capture, and compatibility with both vision and non-vision language models.111-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceOpen-source screenshot tool for Windows with a built-in MCP server that allows AI assistants like Claude to capture and view screen content through tools like take_screenshot, ask_user_to_select_region, and more.3MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to capture screenshots, watch your screen in real-time, read text via OCR, and analyze video files, all running locally as an MCP server.14-
Appeared in Searches
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/codingthefuturewithai/screenshot_mcp_server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server