simplepractice_list_announcements

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, so the safe read-only nature is established. The description adds useful context about the readAt field being null for unread announcements and scopes the data to practice-posted Client Portal announcements, but it does not disclose ordering, pagination behavior, or response shape beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two short sentences with no filler. The core subject is front-loaded, and the readAt clarification earns its place by explaining a meaningful field semantic.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with no required parameters, the description plus the detailed view parameter schema is sufficient for an agent to call it correctly. The lack of an output schema is partially offset by the readAt detail and the schema's description of compact versus full response shapes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%, with the view parameter already well described and pageSize being self-explanatory through its name, default, and maximum. The tool description does not add parameter-level meaning, but the schema carries enough weight for these two simple optional parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource as announcements posted by the practice to the Client Portal, which distinguishes it from sibling list tools like list_appointments or list_documents. It does not explicitly include a verb such as 'lists' or 'retrieves,' but the tool name and phrasing make the operation obvious.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus other listing tools, nor does it state any exclusions or prerequisites. The intended use is only implied by the resource name and the brief description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.