Campertunity MCP Server
OfficialИнструменты ИИ Campertunity
Инструменты ИИ для поиска кемпингов, проверки доступности и бронирования мест по всему миру.
Включает файлы навыков агента и MCP-сервер для поиска кемпингов с помощью ИИ.
Файлы навыков агента
Этот пакет включает файлы навыков, совместимые с OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex и другими агентскими платформами, поддерживающими формат SKILL.md.
Установите навык:
# OpenClaw
openclaw skills install campertunity
# Claude Code / other platforms
# Copy skills/campertunity/SKILL.md to your workspace skills directoryRelated MCP server: Currents
MCP-сервер
Быстрый старт
{
"mcpServers": {
"campertunity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "campertunity-ai-tools@latest"]
}
}
}API-ключ (необязательно)
API-ключ не требуется. Для получения более высоких лимитов запросов получите ключ на campertunity.com/mcp:
{
"mcpServers": {
"campertunity": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "campertunity-ai-tools@latest"],
"env": {
"CAMPERTUNITY_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Доступные инструменты
listing-search
Поиск кемпингов с использованием фильтров и поиска по местоположению.
Параметр | Тип | Описание |
| number | Количество возвращаемых результатов (по умолчанию: 50, макс.: 1000) |
| string | Курсор пагинации из предыдущего ответа |
| string | Дата начала доступности (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД) |
| string | Дата окончания доступности (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД) |
| number | Количество взрослых (по умолчанию: 1) |
| number | Количество детей (по умолчанию: 0) |
| number | Широта центральной точки |
| number | Долгота центральной точки |
| number | Радиус поиска в км (по умолчанию: 20) |
| string | Регион/штат (геокодируется, если не указаны широта/долгота) |
| string | Город (геокодируется, если не указаны широта/долгота) |
| string | Страна (геокодируется, если не указаны широта/долгота) |
| string | Код страны, например "US", "CA" |
| string[] | Теги для фильтрации (см. ниже) |
| string | Описание на естественном языке |
listing-details
Получение подробной информации о конкретном объекте.
Параметр | Тип | Описание |
| string | ID объекта |
listing-availability
Проверка доступности мест для конкретных дат.
Параметр | Тип | Описание |
| string | ID объекта |
| string[] | Необязательные конкретные ID мест |
| string | Дата начала (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД) |
| string | Дата окончания (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД) |
listing-book
Получение URL для бронирования кемпинга.
Параметр | Тип | Описание |
| string | ID объекта |
| string | Дата начала (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД) |
| string | Дата окончания (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД) |
| number | Количество взрослых (по умолчанию: 1) |
| number | Количество детей (по умолчанию: 0) |
Теги фильтров
Типы мест: tent, rv, lodging, glamping, cabin
Доступ: driveIn, walkIn, equestrian, boat
Активности: biking, boating, fishing, hiking, horsebackRiding, paddling, windSports, surfing, swimming, whitewaterPaddling, wildlifeWatching
Удобства: picnicTable, fires, toilets, outhouse, potableWater, petFriendly, rvHookup, rvSanitation, trash, showers, wifi, handicap
Ландшафт: beach, cave, desert, forest, hotSpring, lake, river, swimmingHole, waterfall, creek
Уведомление о данных
Данные собираются из нескольких источников и дополняются с помощью ИИ. Не распространяйте, не кэшируйте и не изменяйте данные. Всегда используйте данные в реальном времени через сервер.
Для получения дополнительной информации посетите campertunity.com.
Available Tools
4 toolsplace-availabilityD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to check availability for. | |
| siteIds | No | The ids of the sites to check availability for. | |
| startDate | Yes | The start date to check availability for. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | Yes | The end date to check availability for. Format: YYYY-MM-DD |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-bookD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to book. | |
| startDate | No | The start date of the booking. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | No | The end date of the booking. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| adults | No | Number of adults. Default is 1. | |
| children | No | Number of children. Default is 0. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-detailsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| placeId | Yes | The id of the place to get details for. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
place-searchD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Number of places to return. Default is 50, max is 1000. | |
| startDate | No | Start date for availability search. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| endDate | No | End date for availability search. Format: YYYY-MM-DD | |
| adults | No | Number of adults. Default is 1. | |
| children | No | Number of children. Default is 0. | |
| latitude | No | Latitude to filter by. | |
| longitude | No | Longitude to filter by. | |
| radius | No | Radius to filter by (in km). | |
| filters | No | Filter out places that have specific tags. | |
| campgroundDescription | No | Describe the campground you are looking for. Note: not the location, but something about the campground like "has a pool" or "near a lake" or "has a playground" |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
4 tool updates
- First observed
place-availability - First observed
place-book - First observed
place-details - First observed
place-search
TDQS
The tools have distinct purposes based on their names: search for finding places, details for getting information, availability for checking status, and book for making reservations. While the lack of descriptions introduces some ambiguity about exact boundaries, the core actions (search, get, check, reserve) are clearly differentiated.
All tools follow a perfect 'place-verb' pattern with hyphenated naming (place-search, place-details, place-availability, place-book). This consistency makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand at a glance.
With 4 tools, this server is well-scoped for a camping/place booking domain. Each tool covers a fundamental operation (search, view details, check availability, book), and there are no extraneous tools—each earns its place in the workflow.
The tool set covers the essential CRUD-like operations for a booking system: search (discover), details (read), availability (check), and book (create). A minor gap is the lack of update/cancel or delete operations for bookings, but agents can still complete core workflows with the provided tools.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for Environment & Nature
Description of my MCP server
Related MCP Servers
- MIT
- Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceBrowserStack's Official MCP Server512,516150AGPL 3.0
- -
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/campertunity/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server