Skip to main content
Glama
bezata

kObsidian MCP

by bezata

Create Task

tasks.create

Add a task to an Obsidian note with due dates, priority, recurrence, and other metadata, and get the inserted line number for reference.

Instructions

Append a new task line to a note. The task is written in Tasks-plugin format: - [ ] <content> {metadata emojis}. Optional metadata (priority, dueDate, scheduledDate, startDate, doneDate, createdDate, recurrence) is encoded as the plugin's convention emojis (🔺⏫📅⏳🛫✅➕🔁). Returns the standard mutation envelope with the 1-based lineNumber where the task was inserted.

Operates on the session-active vault (see vault.current — selectable via vault.select) unless an explicit vaultPath argument is passed, which always wins.

Examples:

Example 1 — Append a simple task with a due date:

{
  "filePath": "Tasks.md",
  "content": "Write the v0.3.0 migration doc",
  "dueDate": "2026-05-01"
}

Example 2 — Append a high-priority weekly recurring task:

{
  "filePath": "Tasks.md",
  "content": "Weekly review",
  "priority": "high",
  "recurrence": "every week on Sunday"
}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusNoInitial checkbox state. Default `incomplete`.
contentYesTask body text (without the `- [ ]` checkbox).
dueDateNo
doneDateNo
filePathYesNote to append the task to.
priorityNoTasks-plugin priority level.
startDateNo
vaultPathNo
recurrenceNoTasks-plugin recurrence expression, e.g. `every day`, `every week on Monday`, `every 2 weeks`.
createdDateNo
scheduledDateNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
targetYesThe path or identifier the tool acted on.
changedYesTrue if the tool altered vault state on this call; false if it was a no-op.
summaryYesShort human-readable summary of what happened.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Addedv0.3.5
  2. Removedv0.3.4
  3. Changed10 schema fields changedv0.1.2
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / content / description
      Added value: +"Task body text (without the `- [ ]` checkbox)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / filePath / description
      Added value: +"Note to append the task to."
    • addedInput schema / properties / priority / description
      Added value: +"Tasks-plugin priority level."
    • addedInput schema / properties / recurrence / description
      Added value: +"Tasks-plugin recurrence expression, e.g. `every day`, `every week on Monday`, `every 2 weeks`."
    • addedInput schema / properties / status / description
      Added value: +"Initial checkbox state. Default `incomplete`."
    • addedOutput schema / description
      Added value: +"Standard mutation envelope. Individual tools may attach additional fields (e.g. `created`, `appended`, `before`/`after` counts) — those are documented in the tool description."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / changed / description
      Added value: +"True if the tool altered vault state on this call; false if it was a no-op."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / summary / description
      Added value: +"Short human-readable summary of what happened."
    • addedOutput schema / properties / target / description
      Added value: +"The path or identifier the tool acted on."
  4. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already signal mutation (readOnlyHint=false) and non-destructiveness, and the description adds meaningful behavior: it writes Tasks-plugin emoji metadata, returns the 1-based lineNumber, and respects the active vault unless vaultPath is provided. It doesn't cover edge cases like missing files, but the disclosed behavior is solid.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and format, then moves to return value and vault behavior, and closes with two compact examples. Every sentence and example earns its place; no filler or repetition of schema details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an 11-parameter creation tool, the description covers the write format, optional metadata, return envelope, vault-selection behavior, and the vaultPath override, and the examples show realistic JSON payloads. The schema and output schema provide the remaining structured details, so nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 45% schema description coverage, the description compensates by listing the optional metadata fields, explaining that they become emoji suffixes, giving examples for dueDate and recurrence, and clarifying that content excludes the checkbox. It doesn't deeply define each date field's semantics, but adds meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Append') and resource ('a new task line to a note'), and further specifies the exact Tasks-plugin format. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like tasks.toggle or tasks.updateMetadata, which modify existing tasks rather than creating new ones.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The opening sentence gives clear context: use this tool to append a new task line to a note, which implies creation rather than toggling or updating existing tasks. It does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bezata/kObsidian'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server