Skip to main content
Glama
beel-es

BeeL MCP server

Official
by beel-es

beel_test_webhook_subscription

Idempotent

Verify webhook endpoints are reachable and handle signed deliveries by triggering a synthetic test payload outside the normal queue.

Instructions

Sends a synthetic payload to the subscription's URL immediately, outside the normal delivery queue. Use it to verify that your endpoint is reachable and handles deliveries correctly before you rely on real events.

  • Payload: carries "test": true and synthetic data, and is signed like any other delivery, so it also exercises your signature check.

  • Retries: none. A failed test is not retried and does not appear in the delivery history.

  • Idempotency-Key: repeating the call with the same key returns the cached result without sending the test payload again.

  • Result: read delivery_success; a delivery your endpoint rejected is still a successful test run, not an error.

Endpoint: POST /v1/accounts/{account_id}/webhooks/{webhook_id}/test

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
account_idYesYour own account, or an account you provisioned. It — not the credential, and not the `BeeL-Active-Company` header — decides which account the operation acts on. An account you do not reach answers `403`, and so does an account that does not exist, so the existence of somebody else's account is never disclosed.
webhook_idYesSubscription of the account in the path. A subscription of another account answers `404`, the same as one that does not exist: under the account resolved from `{account_id}` it simply is not there.
idempotency_keyNoOptional idempotency key for this operation. Omit it and one is derived from the request itself, which makes a blind retry safe but also collapses a SECOND, deliberately identical operation into the first for 24 hours. Set it — to an order id, or anything unique per intended operation — whenever you mean to create something that may look identical to what you just created.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. First observedv0.3.1

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description goes well beyond annotations by disclosing that the payload is signed, that failed tests are not retried, that test deliveries do not appear in delivery history, that the idempotency key caches results, and that an endpoint rejection still counts as a successful test run. This is rich behavioral context beyond readOnly/destructive/idempotent hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a front-loaded summary sentence followed by scannable bullet points. Every section adds useful information, and the endpoint line provides a clear operational reference without unnecessary padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema, the description covers the essential operational details: purpose, payload contents, retry behavior, idempotency behavior, result interpretation, and endpoint. An agent has enough context to invoke the tool correctly and understand the outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents account_id, webhook_id, and idempotency_key thoroughly. The description adds meaningful extra semantics specifically for idempotency_key by explaining cached-result behavior on repeats, which supplements the schema without repeating it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific action and resource: it 'sends a synthetic payload to the subscription's URL immediately, outside the normal delivery queue.' It clearly distinguishes the tool's testing purpose from real delivery and from sibling tools like retry_webhook_delivery by emphasizing synthetic data and verification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives an explicit intended use: 'Use it to verify that your endpoint is reachable and handles deliveries correctly before you rely on real events.' It does not enumerate alternatives or exclusions, but the usage context is clear enough for an agent to select it appropriately.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/beel-es/beel-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server