GitHub MCP Server
This server enables AI assistants and MCP clients to interact with GitHub repositories through the GitHub REST API.
List Repositories (
list_repositories): Retrieve all repositories accessible by the authenticated GitHub user β no input required.Get Repository Details (
get_repository): Fetch detailed information (e.g., name, description, stars, forks) about a specific repository by providing theownerandreponame.
Allows interaction with GitHub repositories and issues via the GitHub REST API, including listing repositories, retrieving repository details, and managing issues.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@GitHub MCP ServerList all my repositories"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
π GitHub MCP Server
A production-ready Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server built with Python that enables AI assistants and MCP clients to interact with GitHub repositories through the GitHub REST API.
This project demonstrates how to build a custom MCP server capable of performing GitHub operations such as listing repositories, retrieving repository information, managing issues, and extending to pull requests, workflows, and code management.
π Features
Repository Management
List all repositories for the authenticated user
Retrieve repository details
Access repository metadata
Issue Management
List repository issues
Create new issues
Close existing issues (future enhancement)
MCP Integration
Built using the official MCP Python SDK
Compatible with MCP Inspector
JSON-RPC based communication
Local STDIO transport support
Related MCP server: GitBridge
ποΈ Architecture
βββββββββββββββββββββββ
β MCP Client β
β (Inspector / AI) β
ββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββ
β
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββββββ
β GitHub MCP Server β
β (Python) β
ββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββ
β
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββββββ
β GitHub REST API β
ββββββββββββ¬βββββββββββ
β
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββββββ
β GitHub Account β
βββββββββββββββββββββββπ Project Structure
github-mcp/
β
βββ server.py
βββ .env
βββ pyproject.toml
βββ uv.lock
βββ .gitignore
βββ README.mdβοΈ Prerequisites
Python 3.10+
UV Package Manager
GitHub Account
GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT)
Node.js (for MCP Inspector)
π GitHub Token Setup
Generate a Personal Access Token from:
https://github.com/settings/tokens
Recommended permissions:
Repository Access
Issues: Read & Write
Contents: Read
Pull Requests: Read & WriteCreate a .env file:
GITHUB_TOKEN=your_github_token_hereπ¦ Installation
Clone the repository:
git clone <repository-url>
cd github-mcpInitialize project:
uv initInstall dependencies:
uv add mcp requests python-dotenvβΆοΈ Running the Server
Start the MCP server:
uv run server.pyThe server will wait for MCP client connections.
π Using MCP Inspector
Start MCP Inspector:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspectorOpen:
http://localhost:6274Connection Settings:
Transport : STDIO
Command:
uv
Arguments:
run server.pyClick Connect.
π οΈ Available Tools
list_repositories
Returns all repositories accessible by the authenticated user.
Example
{}Response
[
{
"name": "github-mcp",
"full_name": "username/github-mcp",
"private": false
}
]get_repository
Returns details for a specific repository.
Input
{
"owner": "username",
"repo": "github-mcp"
}Response
{
"name": "github-mcp",
"description": "GitHub MCP Server",
"stars": 10,
"forks": 2
}π MCP Request Flow
User
β
βΌ
MCP Client
β
βΌ
Tool Call
β
βΌ
GitHub MCP Server
β
βΌ
GitHub REST API
β
βΌ
Response Returnedπ§ Planned Enhancements
Create GitHub Issues
Close Issues
Pull Request Management
Branch Management
File Operations
GitHub Actions Integration
Repository Search
Code Search
OAuth Authentication
Remote MCP Deployment
π§ Learning Outcomes
This project demonstrates:
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
MCP Tools
JSON-RPC Communication
GitHub REST API Integration
Authentication using PAT
MCP Inspector Usage
Production MCP Architecture
Local MCP Server Development
π License
MIT License
π¨βπ» Author
Built as a learning and production-ready MCP project for understanding MCP architecture, GitHub integrations, and AI tooling ecosystems.
Test commit for pull request
Available Tools
2 toolsget_repositoryD
Get details of a repository.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| owner | Yes | ||
| repo | Yes |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No behavioral traits are disclosed. The description does not mention permissions, rate limits, or what 'details' entails. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden but fails to offer any transparency about side effects or prerequisites.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise but at the cost of informativeness. It consists of a single sentence that provides minimal value. Under-specification does not count as effective conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, no output schema, and zero schema description coverage, the description is wholly inadequate. It does not convey enough information for an agent to use the tool correctly or understand its behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the parameters. The owner and repo parameters are not explained beyond their names, leaving their semantics implicit and ambiguous for an agent unfamiliar with GitHub conventions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get details of a repository,' which is a clear verb+resource. However, it is somewhat vague as 'details' is not specific, and it does not distinguish from the sibling tool 'list_repositories' which likely lists repositories rather than getting a single one, but the distinction is only implicit.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention that this tool is for a specific repository identified by owner and repo, nor does it exclude use cases that would be better served by list_repositories.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
list_repositoriesA
List all repositories of the authenticated user.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must convey behavior. It implies a read-only operation by 'list', but does not confirm safety explicitly, nor disclose any side effects, rate limits, or pagination. Adequate for a simple 0-parameter tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the key action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with no parameters and no output schema, but the description does not specify what information is returned (e.g., names only or full details). This leaves some ambiguity for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the description has no burden. The schema coverage is 100% (trivially), and the description correctly omits parameter info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list', the resource 'repositories', and the scope 'of the authenticated user', distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'get_repository' which likely fetches a single repository.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_repository'. There is no mention of context or exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
2 tool updates
v0.1.0- First observed
get_repository - First observed
list_repositories
TDQS
The two tools are clearly distinct: one retrieves details of a specific repository, the other lists all repositories. No overlap in purpose.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern ('get_repository', 'list_repositories'), with appropriate singular/plural usage.
With only 2 tools, the server is extremely limited for a GitHub-related service. Typical functionality requires many more tools (issues, PRs, etc.).
The tool surface is severely incomplete; it lacks any operations related to issues, pull requests, commits, content, or repository management beyond basic retrieval.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Access the GitHub API, enabling file operations, repository management, search functionality, andβ¦
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
Manage repositories, users, releases, and automate GitHub workflows
Connect AI assistants to your GitHub-hosted Obsidian vault to seamlessly access, search, and analyβ¦
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with GitHub repositories through the GitHub REST API for managing files, issues, and repository metadata. It supports both read operations like searching code and write operations such as creating repositories and updating issue comments.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze GitHub repositories, including fetching repository details, searching, and retrieving README content.4672ISC
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to interact with GitHub repositories, issues, pull requests, and code search through the GitHub REST API.12-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with GitHub through the GitHub REST API, supporting repository, file, issue, pull request, branch, commit, search, and label operations with explicit confirmation for write operations.-
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Utkarsh-kumar-singh/MCP-INTEGRATION-GitHub'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server