Which integrations are available for this server?

Provides comprehensive access to Angular documentation, enabling search and retrieval of Angular-related information across 84 topics in 15 categories including components, templates, directives, signals, dependency injection, forms, routing, HTTP client, testing, and more.

How do I use Angular MCP Server?

1. Click on "Install Server". 2. Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state. 3. In the chat, type @ followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Angular MCP Server show me examples of dependency injection in Angular" That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed. Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.

Angular MCP Server

by SAIPRANAY-GANGULA

Overview Schema Related Servers Score Discussions

JavaScript

Remote

Angular MCP Server

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides comprehensive access to Angular documentation, enabling AI assistants to search and retrieve Angular-related information with intelligent relevance scoring.

npm version License: MIT

Features

The server provides 5 powerful tools for Angular documentation:

🔍 `search_angular_docs`

Search Angular documentation for specific topics, concepts, or keywords with intelligent relevance scoring.

Parameters:
- query (required): Search query (e.g., "components", "dependency injection", "routing")
- category (optional): Filter by category (Components, Templates, Directives, etc.)
- limit (optional): Maximum number of results (default: 5)

📖 `get_angular_topic`

Get detailed information about a specific Angular topic.

Parameters:
- topic (required): Specific topic name (e.g., "Component lifecycle", "Signals overview")

📋 `list_angular_categories`

List all available Angular documentation categories with topic counts.

🌟 `get_angular_overview`

Get a comprehensive overview of the Angular framework and its features.

💡 `find_angular_examples`

Find code examples and practical implementations for Angular concepts.

Parameters:
- concept (required): Angular concept to find examples for (e.g., "component", "service", "directive")

Related MCP server: NTV Scaffolding MCP Server

Usage

With Claude Desktop

Add this configuration to your Claude Desktop MCP settings:

macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json Windows: %APPDATA%/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "angular-docs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["angular-mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}

With VSCode (Cline)

Add to your Cline MCP settings: ~/Library/Application Support/Code/User/globalStorage/saoudrizwan.claude-dev/settings/cline_mcp_settings.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "angular-docs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["angular-mcp-server"],
      "disabled": false,
      "autoApprove": []
    }
  }
}

With Amazon Q for command line

Amazon Q CLI supports MCP servers through configuration. Add this to your MCP configuration:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "angular-docs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["angular-mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}

Once configured, you can interact with Angular documentation directly through Amazon Q:

# Start Amazon Q chat with MCP support
q chat

# Example queries you can ask:
# "Search for Angular component lifecycle methods"
# "Show me dependency injection examples"
# "How do I implement reactive forms?"
# "List all Angular documentation categories"

Amazon Q will automatically use the Angular MCP Server to provide comprehensive Angular documentation and code examples.

Example Queries

Once integrated with your AI assistant, you can ask questions like:

"Search for Angular component lifecycle methods"
"Show me information about Angular signals"
"Find examples of dependency injection in Angular"
"List all Angular documentation categories"
"Get an overview of Angular framework"
"How do I implement reactive forms in Angular?"
"What are the best practices for Angular testing?"

Documentation Coverage

The server provides access to 84 Angular documentation topics across 15 categories:

Components (7 topics) - Component basics, lifecycle, styling, inputs/outputs
Templates (7 topics) - Template syntax, binding, control flow, variables
Directives (5 topics) - Built-in and custom directives, composition
Signals (3 topics) - Reactive programming with Angular signals
Dependency Injection (7 topics) - DI patterns, providers, services
Forms (6 topics) - Reactive and template-driven forms, validation
Routing (7 topics) - Navigation, route guards, lazy loading
HTTP Client (5 topics) - API communication, interceptors, testing
Testing (12 topics) - Unit testing, component testing, e2e testing
Server-Side Rendering (6 topics) - SSR, hydration, prerendering
Animations (3 topics) - Component and route animations
RxJS Integration (2 topics) - Observables with Angular
APIs & CLI (2 topics) - Reference documentation
Advanced Topics (9 topics) - Performance, security, best practices
Getting Started (3 topics) - Installation, setup, style guide

Development

Building from Source

git clone https://github.com/SAIPRANAY-GANGULA/angular-mcp-server.git
cd angular-mcp-server
npm install
npm run build

Scripts

npm run build: Compile TypeScript and copy documentation files
npm run start: Run the compiled server
npm run dev: Build and run in development mode
npm run test: Test with MCP inspector

Project Structure

angular-mcp-server/
├── src/
│   ├── index.ts          # Main server implementation
│   ├── llms.txt         # Angular docs structure
│   └── llms-full.txt    # Detailed Angular content
├── build/                # Compiled JavaScript (generated)
├── package.json
├── tsconfig.json
├── LICENSE
└── README.md

Requirements

Node.js: v18.0.0 or higher
npm: v8.0.0 or higher

Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request. For major changes, please open an issue first to discuss what you would like to change.

Fork the repository
Create your feature branch (git checkout -b feature/AmazingFeature)
Commit your changes (git commit -m 'Add some AmazingFeature')
Push to the branch (git push origin feature/AmazingFeature)
Open a Pull Request

Troubleshooting

Common Issues

Server not starting: Ensure Node.js v18+ is installed
Permission errors: Try running with sudo for global installation
MCP client not connecting: Verify the configuration file syntax
No search results: Check that the documentation files are properly loaded

Getting Help

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.

Acknowledgments

Built with the Model Context Protocol SDK
Angular documentation sourced from angular.dev
Inspired by the growing MCP ecosystem

Made with ❤️ for the Angular and AI community

Available Tools

5 tools

find_angular_examplesA

Find code examples and practical implementations for Angular concepts

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`concept`	Yes	Angular concept to find examples for (e.g., "component", "service", "directive")

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only restates the purpose and does not describe any behavioral traits such as return format, error handling, authentication needs, or limitations. This is insufficient for a tool with no annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one concise sentence that immediately states the action and target. There is no fluff or redundancy, making it appropriately sized and effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema, but the description lacks important context such as what the output looks like, any prerequisites, and how it differs from siblings like search_angular_docs. It is adequate but leaves gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description covers the sole parameter 'concept' with an example list, achieving 100% coverage. The tool description adds no extra parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool finds code examples and practical implementations for Angular concepts, using a specific verb and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like search_angular_docs or get_angular_overview, which target different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: it finds examples for Angular concepts. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives, nor does it provide exclusions or criteria for when not to use it. Usage guidance is only implied, not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_angular_overviewB

Get a comprehensive overview of Angular framework and its features

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

B3/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits, but it does not mention what the overview includes, output format, or any side effects. It only states a generic purpose, offering no additional behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no redundant words, making it concise. However, it is also under-specified, which limits the value of that conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (no params, no output schema), but the description lacks context about what 'overview' actually returns or how it differs from get_angular_topic. It is not complete enough for an agent to understand the tool's full capabilities or expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema is fully covered. The description does not need to explain parameters. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4, and no additional parameter context is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb (Get) and resource (Angular framework overview), distinguishing it from sibling tools like search, topic, categories, and examples. However, 'comprehensive overview' is somewhat vague and could be more specific about what content is covered.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_angular_topic or find_angular_examples. There are no exclusions or explicit context for selecting this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_angular_topicC

Get detailed information about a specific Angular topic

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`topic`	Yes	Specific topic name (e.g., "Component lifecycle", "Signals overview")

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'Get detailed information', which is the basic function. It doesn't disclose whether this is a read-only operation, what the response structure looks like, edge cases (e.g., unknown topic), or any side effects. For a tool with no annotation support, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with no fluff. It is concise and front-loaded with the verb. However, it could be slightly more structured to include return value details without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description should explain what 'detailed information' includes or how the result is presented. It does not. With one parameter and no output schema, the description is not enough for an agent to understand what to expect from a call, despite being a simple getter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully covers the single parameter 'topic' with a clear example ("Component lifecycle", "Signals overview"). Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description adds no additional parameter semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: to get detailed information about a specific Angular topic. The word 'specific' differentiates it from the sibling get_angular_overview, which likely covers broader/all topics, and from search/find/list siblings. However, it doesn't specify what kind of 'detailed information' is included, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance or when-to-use versus alternatives is provided. The description implies a scenario (needing details on a specific topic) but never explicitly distinguishes from search_angular_docs, find_angular_examples, or get_angular_overview. An agent would have to infer when this tool is the right choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_angular_categoriesA

List all available Angular documentation categories

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'List', implying a non-destructive read, but does not mention return format, pagination, scope limits, or any other behavioral traits. It adds minimal context beyond the action itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource, and contains no superfluous words. Every word adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is sufficient to convey the action and scope. It could mention the output shape, but given the simplicity, the single sentence covers the essential purpose. Sibling tools provide context for comparison.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is no need for the description to explain parameter meanings. Baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description does not need to compensate for any schema gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('List') and a clear resource ('all available Angular documentation categories'), distinguishing it from sibling tools that search, fetch topics, or find examples. The scope is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It simply states what it does without mentioning any context, exclusions, or relationships to sibling tools like search_angular_docs or get_angular_overview.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

search_angular_docsB

Search Angular documentation for specific topics, concepts, or keywords

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`limit`	No	Maximum number of results to return (default: 5)
`query`	Yes	Search query (e.g., "components", "dependency injection", "routing")
`category`	No	Optional: Filter by category (Components, Templates, Directives, etc.)

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'search' without explaining result format, ordering, pagination, or error handling. The description does not contradict any annotations (since none exist), but it offers minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, highly concise and readable. It conveys the core purpose without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is thin. It does not clarify what results look like, how to interpret them, or how to refine searches. For a tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, this is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all three parameters. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema. It mentions 'topics, concepts, or keywords' which aligns with the query parameter example, but doesn't enrich understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: searching Angular documentation for topics, concepts, or keywords. The verb 'search' distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'get' and 'list', which imply retrieval of specific items or categories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling tools. It does not mention alternatives or exclusions. The user must infer that search is for open-ended queries, but no explicit direction is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

5 tool updatesv1.1.1Aug 1, 2026
- First observedfind_angular_examples
- First observedget_angular_overview
- First observedget_angular_topic
- First observedlist_angular_categories
- First observedsearch_angular_docs

Install Server

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct kind of Angular documentation access: searching broadly, retrieving topic details, listing categories, getting an overview, and finding examples. Search and find_examples could overlap slightly, but their descriptions clarify broad versus example-specific lookup, so confusion is unlikely.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names follow a consistent verb_angular_noun pattern: search/get/list/find all pair with clear object nouns. The two 'get' tools are distinguishable by their object (topic vs overview), and no mixed naming conventions appear.

Tool Count5/5

Five tools is well-scoped for a documentation-focused server, providing essential access patterns without bloat. The count feels right for the stated purpose.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers search, detail retrieval, category navigation, overview, and examples—covering the main ways users interact with Angular docs. A minor gap is lack of a tool to list topics within a specific category, but the core workflows are supported.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive

ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Need Help?

Reddit Discussion

Related Servers

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

developer-toolkit-mcp A
io.github.mjaskolski
The documentation, as a tool your agent can call: 950+ AI-dev guides. Search + fetch tools.
AI & Machine Learning Search
21
ref-tools-ref-tools-mcpOAuth
ai.smithery
Provide your AI coding tools with token-efficient access to up-to-date technical documentation for…
Documentation Access Developer Tools Code Analysis
21,164
developer-tools A
goog.workspace-developer
Provides tools for searching Google Workspace documentation and much more.
Developer Tools Documentation Access Search
22
docs-mcp A
com.redpanda
Get authoritative answers about Redpanda documentation and search API references.
Documentation Access Search Developer Tools
521

Related MCP Servers

PrimeNG MCP Server
Documentation Access Developer Tools Code Analysis
hnkatze
A
license
A
quality
D
maintenance
Provides access to PrimeNG component documentation and generates code examples. Supports searching components, retrieving documentation, and creating practical usage examples for Angular UI development.
Updated 10 months ago (2025-11-10 00:20 UTC)
9
21
1
MIT
NTV Scaffolding MCP Server
Developer Tools Code Analysis Documentation Access
stephenlumban
F
license
B
quality
Not graded
maintenance
Enables AI assistants to discover, understand, and generate code for NTV Scaffolding Angular components, including documentation lookup, template generation, and complete component file scaffolding.
Updated 10 months ago (2025-11-03 05:11 UTC)
8
-
DevDocs MCP Server
Documentation Access Developer Tools Search
JavierDevCol
F
license
A
quality
D
maintenance
Provides AI models with direct access to documentation for over 600 technologies from DevDocs.io, including popular languages, frameworks, and tools. It enables comprehensive searching, content retrieval, and offline access via an intelligent local caching system.
Updated 8 months ago (2026-01-14 06:37 UTC)
12
2
-
No.JS MCP Server
Developer Tools Documentation Access Code Analysis
ErickXavier
A
license
A
quality
C
maintenance
Provides AI assistants with deep knowledge of the No.JS framework, including documentation for over 80 directives and 32 built-in filters. It enables tools for template validation, component scaffolding, and quick reference access to the framework's public API.
Updated 4 months ago (2026-05-07 05:48 UTC)
5
9
MIT

Latest Blog Posts

Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)
By Om-Shree-0709 on July 25, 2026.
mcp
Agent Identity
OAuth 2.1
Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an Intern
By Om-Shree-0709 on July 2, 2026.
Agent Identity
MCP Security
OAuth Delegation
Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)
By Om-Shree-0709 on June 30, 2026.
Agentic Ai
Prompt Injection
WebAssembly

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SAIPRANAY-GANGULA/angular-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server

Angular MCP Server

Features

🔍 search_angular_docs

📖 get_angular_topic

📋 list_angular_categories

🌟 get_angular_overview

💡 find_angular_examples

Usage

With Claude Desktop

With VSCode (Cline)

With Amazon Q for command line

Example Queries

Documentation Coverage

Development

Building from Source

Scripts

Project Structure

Requirements

Contributing

Troubleshooting

Common Issues

Getting Help

License

Acknowledgments

Available Tools

Tool Schema Changelog

Maintenance

Resources

Looking for Admin?

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

🔍 `search_angular_docs`

📖 `get_angular_topic`

📋 `list_angular_categories`

🌟 `get_angular_overview`

💡 `find_angular_examples`